Literature DB >> 11195118

A review of halo vest treatment of upper cervical spine injuries.

U Vieweg1, R Schultheiss.   

Abstract

Thirty-five relevant studies involving in total 682 patients with 709 different types of injuries were evaluated in a review to determine the outcomes after immobilisation in a halo vest for various injuries to the upper cervical spine between 1962 and 1998. Studies were analysed according to the type of injury pattern and in terms of the treatment outcomes following primary treatment with a halo vest. The following types of injuries were evaluated: odontoid fractures (n = 420), hangman's fractures (n = 172), other axis fractures (n = 75), Jefferson fractures (n = 26), C1 arch fractures (n = 9), atlantooccipital (n = 2) and atlantoaxial dislocations (n = 5). The ligamentary atlantooccipital dislocations never healed. All isolated Cl ring fractures healed completely. The isolated C1 arch fractures healed in 83% of the cases. The ligamentary atlantoaxial dislocations had a 60% rate of healing. Healing was noted in all isolated odontoid type I fractures, 85% of the isolated odontoid type II fractures, and 67% of the odontoid type II fractures with combined injuries. The isolated odontoid type III fractures had a 97% healing rate. The non-classifiable odontoid fractures had a healing rate of 85%. The stable C2 arch fractures (hangman's fracture) healed consistently in 99%, and 90% success was found for other C2 fractures. A halo vest can be recommended for patients with isolated Jefferson fractures, hangman's fractures, odontoid type III and type II fractures, with a low dislocation rate. The results of treatment with a halo vest were unsatisfactory with regard to combined injuries with an odontoid type II fracture. An overall healing rate of 86%, however, allows one to conclude that this treatment continues to be a good alternative to operative stabilisation of bone injuries to the upper cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11195118     DOI: 10.1007/s004020000182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  16 in total

1.  Why you should wear your seatbelt on an airplane: Burst fracture of the atlas (jefferson fracture) due to in-flight turbulence.

Authors:  Nikola Lekic; Jonathan Sheu; Hayley Ennis; Nathan Lebwohl; Motasem Al-Maaieh
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-06-15

2.  Atlas and axis injuries role of Halovest.

Authors:  Younis Kamal; M S Ortho; Hayat Ahmad Khan; Naseemul Gani; Ansar Ul Haq; Snobar Gul; Dara Singh
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2014-10

Review 3.  Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: an evidence-based narrative review of management.

Authors:  D Pal; P Sell; M Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [On the problem of halo vest treatment in the elderly. Results of a retrospective analysis].

Authors:  T Lögters; S Hoppe; W Linhart; C Habermann; J Windolf; J Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  A systematic review of the management of hangman's fractures.

Authors:  Xin-Feng Li; Li-Yang Dai; Hua Lu; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Optimal use of the halo-vest orthosis for upper cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  Jun Jae Shin; Sang Jin Kim; Tae Hong Kim; Hyung Shik Shin; Yong Soon Hwang; Sang Keun Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 7.  Pneumocranium secondary to halo vest pin penetration through an enlarged frontal sinus.

Authors:  Min Lee Cheong; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Lim Beng Saw; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A minimally invasive approach to long-term head fixation in behaving nonhuman primates.

Authors:  T S Davis; K Torab; P House; B Greger
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 9.  What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Laurent Audigé; Beate Hanson; Jens R Chapman; Allard J F Hosman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Odontoid Type II fractures in elderly: what are the real management goals and how to best achieve them? A multicenter European study on functional outcome.

Authors:  Salvatore Chibbaro; Charles-Henry Mallereau; Mario Ganau; Ismail Zaed; Maria Teresa Bozzi; Antonino Scibilia; Helene Cebula; Irene Ollivier; Marie-Pierre Loit; Dominique Chaussemy; Hugo-Andres Coca; Guillaume Dannhoff; Antonio Romano; Beniamino Nannavecchia; Arthur Gubian; Giorgio Spatola; Francesco Signorelli; Corrado Iaccarino; Raoul Pop; François Proust; Seyyid Baloglu; Julien Todeschi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.