Literature DB >> 34232354

Forensic age estimation based on magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal humeral epiphysis in Chinese living individuals.

Ting Lu1, Li-Rong Qiu1, Bo Ren2, Lei Shi1, Fei Fan3, Zhen-Hua Deng4.   

Abstract

Forensic age estimation in living individuals is mainly based on radiological features, but direct radiography and computed tomography lead to a rise in ethical concerns due to radiation exposure. Thus, the contribution of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to age estimation of living individuals is a subject of ongoing research. In the current study, MRIs of shoulder were retrospectively collected from a modern Chinese Han population and data from 835 individuals (599 males and 236 females) in the age group 12 to 30 years were obtained. A staging technique based on (Schmidt et al. Int J Legal Med 121(4):321-324, 2007) and (Kellinghaus et al. Int J Legal Med 124(4):321-325, 2010) was used and all images were evaluated with T1-wieghted turbo spin echo (T1-TSE) sequence and T2-weighed fat suppression (T2-FS) sequence. One-sided images were assessed because data from both sides were considered coincidental, as no significant differences were found (P > 0.05). Two MRI sequences were evaluated separately and subsequently compared. Regression models and supportive vector classification (SVC) models were established accordingly. The intraobserver and interobserver agreement levels were good. Compared with T1-TSE sequence, the R2 values of T2-FS sequence were generally higher, while the mean absolute deviation (MAD) values were slightly lower. For T2-FS sequence, the MAD value was 1.49 years in males and 2.19 years in females. With two MRI sequences incorporated, the SVC model obtained with 85.7% correctly classified minors and 96.2% correctly classified adults in males, while 83.3% and 98.0% respectively in females. In conclusion, T2-FS sequence may slightly outperform the T1-TSE sequence in shoulder MRI analysis for age estimation, while shoulder MRIs could be a reliable prediction indicator for the 18-year threshold and two MRI sequences incorporated are encouraged.

Keywords:  Age estimation; Forensic anthropology; MRI; Proximal humeral epiphysis; The 18-year threshold

Year:  2021        PMID: 34232354     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02653-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  30 in total

1.  Dental age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of lower third molars.

Authors:  Yucheng Guo; Andreas Olze; Christian Ottow; Sven Schmidt; Ronald Schulz; Walter Heindel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Volker Vieth; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Age estimation.

Authors:  A Schmeling; G Geserick; W Reisinger; A Olze
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Criteria for age estimation in living individuals.

Authors:  A Schmeling; C Grundmann; A Fuhrmann; H-J Kaatsch; B Knell; F Ramsthaler; W Reisinger; T Riepert; S Ritz-Timme; F W Rösing; K Rötzscher; G Geserick
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the medial extremity of the clavicle in forensic bone age determination: a new four-minute approach.

Authors:  Elke Hillewig; J De Tobel; O Cuche; P Vandemaele; M Piette; K Verstraete
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dental age estimation of living persons: Comparison of MRI with OPG.

Authors:  Pia Baumann; Thomas Widek; Heiko Merkens; Julian Boldt; Andreas Petrovic; Martin Urschler; Barbara Kirnbauer; Norbert Jakse; Eva Scheurer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Automated age estimation from MRI volumes of the hand.

Authors:  Darko Štern; Christian Payer; Martin Urschler
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis: a new criterion of maturity for determining whether the age of 18 has been completed?

Authors:  M Timme; C Ottow; R Schulz; H Pfeiffer; W Heindel; V Vieth; A Schmeling; S Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Dental age estimation: The chronology of mineralization and eruption of male third molars with 3T MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Widek; Pia Genet; Heiko Merkens; Julian Boldt; Andreas Petrovic; Jacquie Vallis; Eva Scheurer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Estimating forensic age via magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis.

Authors:  Ali Er; Mustafa Bozdag; Can Doruk Basa; Ismail Eralp Kacmaz; Oguzhan Ekizoglu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Hand MRI and the Greulich-Pyle atlas in skeletal age estimation in adolescents.

Authors:  Azadeh Hojreh; Jutta Gamper; Maria T Schmook; Michael Weber; Daniela Prayer; Christian J Herold; Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  3 in total

1.  Forensic age prediction and age classification for critical age thresholds via 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Deng; Ting Lu; Guang-Feng Liu; Fei Fan; Zhao Peng; Xiao-Qian Chen; Tian-Wu Chen; Meng-Jun Zhan; Lei Shi; Shuai Luo; Xing-Tao Zhang; Meng Liu; Shi-Wen Qiu; Bin Cong; Zhen-Hua Deng
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Development and validation of a novel 133-plex forensic STR panel (52 STRs and 81 Y-STRs) using single-end 400 bp massive parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Haoliang Fan; Lingxiang Wang; Changhui Liu; Xiaoyu Lu; Xuding Xu; Kai Ru; Pingming Qiu; Chao Liu; Shao-Qing Wen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.791

3.  Validity of age estimation methods and reproducibility of bone/dental maturity indices for chronological age estimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies.

Authors:  V Marconi; M Iommi; C Monachesi; A Faragalli; E Skrami; R Gesuita; L Ferrante; F Carle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.