OBJECTIVES: The use of 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the clavicle in forensic bone age determination was prospectively examined and compared with plain radiography. METHODS: Four MRI sequences and three radiographs of 121 healthy subjects between 11 and 30 were studied by two observers. RESULTS: The number of images assessable for bone age determination was lower for plain radiography (PA: 68.7%; oblique: 97.5%) compared with MRI (VIBE: 99.0%). Concerning the subjective level of difficulty to assess bone age, the observers found it easier to assess bone age on MRI than on radiography. The developmental stages of the clavicle, as used on plain radiography, were transferable to MRI. Especially the VIBE gradient echo sequence provided an excellent depiction of the growth cartilage and ossification centre with a slice thickness of 0.9 mm and only a 4-min acquisition time. When the developmental stages were assigned, less variability between the observers was seen on MRI, compared with plain radiography. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 3T MRI provides high resolution, cross-sectional images of the maturation of the clavicle without ionising radiation in a very short time, allowing more accurate determination of bone age than plain radiography.
OBJECTIVES: The use of 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the clavicle in forensic bone age determination was prospectively examined and compared with plain radiography. METHODS: Four MRI sequences and three radiographs of 121 healthy subjects between 11 and 30 were studied by two observers. RESULTS: The number of images assessable for bone age determination was lower for plain radiography (PA: 68.7%; oblique: 97.5%) compared with MRI (VIBE: 99.0%). Concerning the subjective level of difficulty to assess bone age, the observers found it easier to assess bone age on MRI than on radiography. The developmental stages of the clavicle, as used on plain radiography, were transferable to MRI. Especially the VIBE gradient echo sequence provided an excellent depiction of the growth cartilage and ossification centre with a slice thickness of 0.9 mm and only a 4-min acquisition time. When the developmental stages were assigned, less variability between the observers was seen on MRI, compared with plain radiography. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 3T MRI provides high resolution, cross-sectional images of the maturation of the clavicle without ionising radiation in a very short time, allowing more accurate determination of bone age than plain radiography.
Authors: Ronald Schulz; Matthias Mühler; Walter Reisinger; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Jan S Bauer; Stefanie J Krause; Christian J Ross; Roland Krug; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Eugene Ozhinsky; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andreas Schmeling; Ronald Schulz; Walter Reisinger; Matthias Mühler; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Gunther Geserick Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2003-10-08 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Sven Schmidt; Matthias Mühler; Andreas Schmeling; Walter Reisinger; Ronald Schulz Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 2.791
Authors: Daniel Wittschieber; Christian Ottow; Ronald Schulz; Klaus Püschel; Thomas Bajanowski; Frank Ramsthaler; Heidi Pfeiffer; Volker Vieth; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Daniel Wittschieber; Ronald Schulz; Volker Vieth; Martin Küppers; Thomas Bajanowski; Frank Ramsthaler; Klaus Püschel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Michel De Maeseneer; Leon Lenchik; Nico Buls; Cedric Boulet; Seema Döring; Johan de Mey; Inneke Willekens Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Philipp Scharte; Volker Vieth; Ronald Schulz; Frank Ramsthaler; Klaus Püschel; Thomas Bajanowski; Heidi Pfeiffer; Andreas Schmeling; Sven Schmidt; Daniel Wittschieber Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: M Timme; C Ottow; R Schulz; H Pfeiffer; W Heindel; V Vieth; A Schmeling; S Schmidt Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Jannick De Tobel; Elke Hillewig; Michiel Bart de Haas; Bram Van Eeckhout; Steffen Fieuws; Patrick Werner Thevissen; Koenraad Luc Verstraete Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: R Cameriere; S De Luca; D De Angelis; V Merelli; A Giuliodori; M Cingolani; C Cattaneo; L Ferrante Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 2.686