Literature DB >> 34232160

Refining determinants of associations of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability with cardiovascular risk: results from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Trial.

Daniel S Nuyujukian1, Jin J Zhou1,2, Juraj Koska1, Peter D Reaven1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As there is uncertainty about the extent to which baseline blood pressure level or cardiovascular risk modifies the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPv) and cardiovascular disease, we comprehensively examined the role of BPv in cardiovascular disease risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial.
METHODS: Using data from ACCORD, we examined the relationship of BPv with development of the primary CVD outcome, major coronary heart disease (CHD), and total stroke using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: BPv was associated with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD but not stroke. The positive association with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD was more pronounced in low and high strata of baseline SBP (<120 and >140 mmHg) and DBP (<70 and >80 mmHg). The effect of BPv on CVD and CHD was more pronounced in those with both prior CVD history and low blood pressure. Dips, not elevations, in blood pressure appeared to drive these associations. The relationships were generally not attenuated by adjustment for mean blood pressure, medication adherence, or baseline comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis using CVD events from the long-term posttrial follow-up (ACCORDION) was consistent with the results from ACCORD.
CONCLUSION: In ACCORD, the effect of BPv on adverse cardiovascular (but not cerebrovascular) outcomes is modified by baseline blood pressure and prior CVD. Recognizing these more nuanced relationships may help improve risk stratification and blood pressure management decisions as well as provide insight into potential underlying mechanisms.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34232160      PMCID: PMC8500916          DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  42 in total

1.  Systolic Blood Pressure Control Among Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Three Interventions.

Authors:  Mark A Espeland; Jeffery Probstfield; Donald Hire; J Bruce Redmon; Gregory W Evans; Mace Coday; Cora E Lewis; Karen C Johnson; Sharon Wilmoth; Judy Bahnson; Michael F Dulin; Jennifer B Green; William C Knowler; Abbas Kitabchi; Anne L Murillo; Kwame Osei; Shakaib U Rehman; William C Cushman
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Blood pressure variability remains an elusive predictor of cardiovascular outcome.

Authors:  Tine W Hansen; Yan Li; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Older Adults: The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study.

Authors:  Chenkai Wu; Michael G Shlipak; Robert S Stawski; Carmen A Peralta; Bruce M Psaty; Tamara B Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Eric J Shiroma; Anne B Newman; Michelle C Odden
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 4.  Systemic and cerebral circulatory adjustment within the first 60 s after active standing: An integrative physiological view.

Authors:  Mark P M Harms; Ciáran Finucane; Laura Pérez-Denia; Stephen P Juraschek; Veera K van Wijnen; Lewis A Lipsitz; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.145

5.  Glycemic Variation and Cardiovascular Risk in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.

Authors:  Jin J Zhou; Dawn C Schwenke; Gideon Bahn; Peter Reaven
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Nine-Year Effects of 3.7 Years of Intensive Glycemic Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT.

Authors:  Kenechukwu Mezue; Abhinav Goyal; Gregg S Pressman; Roy Matthew; Jay C Horrow; Janani Rangaswami
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Trends in end digit preference for blood pressure and associations with cardiovascular outcomes in Canadian and UK primary care: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Michelle Greiver; Sumeet Kalia; Teja Voruganti; Babak Aliarzadeh; Rahim Moineddin; William Hinton; Martin Dawes; Frank Sullivan; Saddaf Syed; John Williams; Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  How important is blood pressure variability?

Authors:  Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Giulia Chiarini; Damiano Rizzoni
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.803

Review 10.  Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah L Stevens; Sally Wood; Constantinos Koshiaris; Kathryn Law; Paul Glasziou; Richard J Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-08-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Baseline blood pressure modifies the role of blood pressure variability in mortality: Results from the ACCORD trial.

Authors:  Daniel S Nuyujukian; Michelle S Newell; Jin J Zhou; Juraj Koska; Peter D Reaven
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 2.  Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques.

Authors:  Aletta E Schutte; Anastasios Kollias; George S Stergiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 49.421

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.