Daniel S Nuyujukian1, Jin J Zhou1,2, Juraj Koska1, Peter D Reaven1,3. 1. Phoenix VA Healthcare System, Phoenix. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson. 3. College of Medicine-Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: As there is uncertainty about the extent to which baseline blood pressure level or cardiovascular risk modifies the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPv) and cardiovascular disease, we comprehensively examined the role of BPv in cardiovascular disease risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial. METHODS: Using data from ACCORD, we examined the relationship of BPv with development of the primary CVD outcome, major coronary heart disease (CHD), and total stroke using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: BPv was associated with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD but not stroke. The positive association with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD was more pronounced in low and high strata of baseline SBP (<120 and >140 mmHg) and DBP (<70 and >80 mmHg). The effect of BPv on CVD and CHD was more pronounced in those with both prior CVD history and low blood pressure. Dips, not elevations, in blood pressure appeared to drive these associations. The relationships were generally not attenuated by adjustment for mean blood pressure, medication adherence, or baseline comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis using CVD events from the long-term posttrial follow-up (ACCORDION) was consistent with the results from ACCORD. CONCLUSION: In ACCORD, the effect of BPv on adverse cardiovascular (but not cerebrovascular) outcomes is modified by baseline blood pressure and prior CVD. Recognizing these more nuanced relationships may help improve risk stratification and blood pressure management decisions as well as provide insight into potential underlying mechanisms.
OBJECTIVES: As there is uncertainty about the extent to which baseline blood pressure level or cardiovascular risk modifies the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPv) and cardiovascular disease, we comprehensively examined the role of BPv in cardiovascular disease risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial. METHODS: Using data from ACCORD, we examined the relationship of BPv with development of the primary CVD outcome, major coronary heart disease (CHD), and total stroke using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: BPv was associated with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD but not stroke. The positive association with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD was more pronounced in low and high strata of baseline SBP (<120 and >140 mmHg) and DBP (<70 and >80 mmHg). The effect of BPv on CVD and CHD was more pronounced in those with both prior CVD history and low blood pressure. Dips, not elevations, in blood pressure appeared to drive these associations. The relationships were generally not attenuated by adjustment for mean blood pressure, medication adherence, or baseline comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis using CVD events from the long-term posttrial follow-up (ACCORDION) was consistent with the results from ACCORD. CONCLUSION: In ACCORD, the effect of BPv on adverse cardiovascular (but not cerebrovascular) outcomes is modified by baseline blood pressure and prior CVD. Recognizing these more nuanced relationships may help improve risk stratification and blood pressure management decisions as well as provide insight into potential underlying mechanisms.
Authors: Mark A Espeland; Jeffery Probstfield; Donald Hire; J Bruce Redmon; Gregory W Evans; Mace Coday; Cora E Lewis; Karen C Johnson; Sharon Wilmoth; Judy Bahnson; Michael F Dulin; Jennifer B Green; William C Knowler; Abbas Kitabchi; Anne L Murillo; Kwame Osei; Shakaib U Rehman; William C Cushman Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Chenkai Wu; Michael G Shlipak; Robert S Stawski; Carmen A Peralta; Bruce M Psaty; Tamara B Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Eric J Shiroma; Anne B Newman; Michelle C Odden Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Mark P M Harms; Ciáran Finucane; Laura Pérez-Denia; Stephen P Juraschek; Veera K van Wijnen; Lewis A Lipsitz; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wouter Wieling Journal: Auton Neurosci Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 3.145
Authors: Michelle Greiver; Sumeet Kalia; Teja Voruganti; Babak Aliarzadeh; Rahim Moineddin; William Hinton; Martin Dawes; Frank Sullivan; Saddaf Syed; John Williams; Simon de Lusignan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah L Stevens; Sally Wood; Constantinos Koshiaris; Kathryn Law; Paul Glasziou; Richard J Stevens; Richard J McManus Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-08-09
Authors: Daniel S Nuyujukian; Michelle S Newell; Jin J Zhou; Juraj Koska; Peter D Reaven Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.577