Literature DB >> 29984884

Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT.

Kenechukwu Mezue1,2, Abhinav Goyal2, Gregg S Pressman3, Roy Matthew4, Jay C Horrow5, Janani Rangaswami2,6.   

Abstract

SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) highlighted the benefits of intensive targeted antihypertensive therapy but resulted in higher rates of treatment-related adverse events. Blood pressure (BP) variability has emerged as a significant predictor of outcomes over and above levels of BP. Using the SPRINT data set, we aimed to determine the relationship of BP variability with cardiovascular outcomes and side effects of antihypertensive therapy. The analyses included all participants randomized in SPRINT who reached the target systolic BP (SBP) for their respective groups (intensive < 120 mm Hg; standard < 140 mm Hg). Coefficients of variation (CV) for SBP, diastolic BP (DBP), and PP for each patient characterized variability. Student t test was used to compare treatment arms for each CV metric. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of the SPRINT primary outcome and adverse events. P < .15 on univariate analysis was required to enter the model and P < .05 to remain in it. A total of 8884 patients (4561 standard group; 4323 intensive group) met inclusion criteria. DBP CV differed between the groups (9.12 ± 3.20 standard group; 9.47 ± 3.49 intensive group [P < .0001]). DBP CV predicted a greater hazard for the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14) in the overall model as well as separate analyses by treatment arms (standard group HR, 1.15; intensive group HR, 1.19), each P < .0001. DBP CV also independently predicted a greater hazard for acute kidney injury (HR, 1.12) and hypotensive events (HR, 1.12). Visit-to-visit DBP variability independently predicted worse cardiovascular outcomes and hypoperfusion-related adverse events in SPRINT. ©2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure variability; cardiovascular outcomes; hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29984884      PMCID: PMC8031192          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  31 in total

1.  The influence of dose of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor on systolic blood pressure variability in heart failure: a substudy of the Assessment of Treatment with Lisinopril and Survival in heart failure (ATLAS) trial.

Authors:  T D Giles; E K Kerut; L E Roffidal; R Jones; M B Given; H Hutchinson; O Tresznewsky
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.444

2.  Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure is correlated with diabetic nephropathy and atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okada; Michiaki Fukui; Muhei Tanaka; Shinobu Inada; Yusuke Mineoka; Naoko Nakanishi; Takafumi Senmaru; Kazumi Sakabe; Emi Ushigome; Mai Asano; Masahiro Yamazaki; Goji Hasegawa; Naoto Nakamura
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.162

3.  Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Eoin O'Brien; Roland Asmar; Lawrie Beilin; Yutaka Imai; Giuseppe Mancia; Thomas Mengden; Martin Myers; Paul Padfield; Paolo Palatini; Gianfranco Parati; Thomas Pickering; Josep Redon; Jan Staessen; George Stergiou; Paolo Verdecchia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The bedtime administration ameliorates blood pressure variability and reduces urinary albumin excretion in amlodipine-olmesartan combination therapy.

Authors:  Atsushi Hoshino; Takeshi Nakamura; Hiroaki Matsubara
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 1.749

6.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias.

Authors:  S MacMahon; R Peto; J Cutler; R Collins; P Sorlie; J Neaton; R Abbott; J Godwin; A Dyer; J Stamler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Heart rate and blood pressure variability in subjects with vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Gianfranco Piccirillo; Camilla Naso; Antonio Moisè; Marco Lionetti; Marialuce Nocco; Silvia Di Carlo; Tiziana De Laurentis; Damiano Magrì; Mauro Cacciafesta; Vincenzo Marigliano
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.124

8.  Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT.

Authors:  Kenechukwu Mezue; Abhinav Goyal; Gregg S Pressman; Roy Matthew; Jay C Horrow; Janani Rangaswami
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Effects of calcium channel blocker-based combinations on intra-individual blood pressure variability: post hoc analysis of the COPE trial.

Authors:  Seiji Umemoto; Toshio Ogihara; Masunori Matsuzaki; Hiromi Rakugi; Yasuo Ohashi; Takao Saruta
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 10.  Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah L Stevens; Sally Wood; Constantinos Koshiaris; Kathryn Law; Paul Glasziou; Richard J Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-08-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  Carbidopa for Afferent Baroreflex Failure in Familial Dysautonomia: A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann; Jose-Alberto Palma; Jose Martinez; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Hypertension and Dementia: A comprehensive review from the HOPE Asia Network.

Authors:  Yuda Turana; Jeslyn Tengkawan; Yook Chin Chia; Satoshi Hoshide; Jinho Shin; Chen-Huan Chen; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Jennifer Nailes; Sungha Park; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Jam Chin Tay; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Yuqing Zhang; Ji-Guang Wang; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT.

Authors:  Kenechukwu Mezue; Abhinav Goyal; Gregg S Pressman; Roy Matthew; Jay C Horrow; Janani Rangaswami
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Response to Letter to the Editor concerning manuscript, "Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in sprint".

Authors:  Kenechukwu Mezue; Abhinav Goyal; Gregg S Pressman; Roy Matthew; Jay C Horrow; Janani Rangaswami
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Prognostic relevance of visit-to-visit office blood pressure variability in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Same data, different conclusions?

Authors:  Tara I Chang; David M Reboussin; Glenn M Chertow; Alfred K Cheung; William C Cushman; William J Kostis; Gianfranco Parati; Erik Riessen; Brian Shapiro; George S Stergiou; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Paul K Whelton; Jeffrey Whittle; Jackson T Wright; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Prognostic importance of long-term SBP variability in high-risk hypertension.

Authors:  Rita Del Pinto; Davide Pietropaoli; Mirela Dobre; Claudio Ferri
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.776

7.  Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is common in primary care patients: Retrospective cohort study of 221,803 adults.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Brendan Cord Lethebe; Alexander A Leung; Rajdeep S Padwal; Tyler Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Refining determinants of associations of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability with cardiovascular risk: results from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Trial.

Authors:  Daniel S Nuyujukian; Jin J Zhou; Juraj Koska; Peter D Reaven
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Study on the Formation of Antihypertensive Twin Drugs by Caffeic Acid and Ferulic Acid with Telmisartan.

Authors:  Pengshou Li; Yingying Peng; Qixiang Ma; Ziyong Li; Xiaohua Zhang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Complications of White-coat Hypertension Compared to a Normotensive and Hypertensive Population.

Authors:  Ziad Abdullah Taher; Waleed W Khayyat; Marwan M Balubaid; Mohamed Y Tashkandi; Saeed M Alamoudi; Abdulhalim Jamal Kinsara
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2021-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.