Literature DB >> 34227707

New means, new measures: assessing prescription drug-seeking indicators over 10 years of the opioid epidemic.

Brea L Perry1,2, Meltem Odabaş2, Kai-Cheng Yang3, Byungkyu Lee2, Patrick Kaminski2,3, Brian Aronson2, Yong-Yeol Ahn1,3, Carrie B Oser4, Patricia R Freeman5, Jeffrey C Talbert5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prescription drug-seeking (PDS) from multiple prescribers is a primary means of obtaining prescription opioids; however, PDS behavior has probably evolved in response to policy shifts, and there is little agreement about how to operationalize it. We systematically compared the performance of traditional and novel PDS indicators.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study using a de-identified commercial claims database.
SETTING: United States, 2009-18. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 318 million provider visits from 21.5 million opioid-prescribed patients. MEASUREMENTS: We applied binary classification and generalized linear models to compare predictive accuracy and average marginal effect size predicting future opioid use disorder (OUD), overdose and high morphine milligram equivalents (MME). We compared traditional indicators of PDS to a network centrality measure, PageRank, that reflects the prominence of patients in a co-prescribing network. Analyses used the same data and adjusted for patient demographics, region, SES, diagnoses and health services.
FINDINGS: The predictive accuracy of a widely used traditional measure (N + unique doctors and N + unique pharmacies in 90 days) on OUD, overdose and MME decreased between 2009 and 2018, and performed no better than chance (50% accuracy) after 2015. Binarized PageRank measures however exhibited higher predictive accuracy than the traditional binary measures throughout 2009-2018. Continuous indicators of PDS performed better than binary thresholds, with days of Rx performing best overall with 77-93% predictive accuracy. For example, days of Rx had the highest average marginal effects on overdose and OUD: a 1 standard deviation increase in days of Rx was associated with a 6-8% [confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.058-0.061 and 0.078-0.082] increase in the probability of overdose and a 4-5% (CIs = 0.038-0.043 and 0.047-0.053) increase in the probability of OUD. PageRank performed nearly as well or better than traditional indicators of PDS, with predictive performance increasing after 2016.
CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, network-based measures appear to have increasing promise for identifying prescription opioid drug-seeking behavior, while indicators based on quantity of providers or pharmacies appear to have decreasing utility.
© 2021 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-prescription networks; drug dependence; opiates; opioid use disorder; overdose; prescription drug-seeking; prescription opioids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34227707      PMCID: PMC8664959          DOI: 10.1111/add.15635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  30 in total

1.  Possible Opioid Shopping and its Correlates.

Authors:  Alexander M Walker; Lisa B Weatherby; M Soledad Cepeda; Daniel Bradford; Yingli Yuan
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Multiple prescribers in older frequent opioid users--does it mean abuse?

Authors:  C Ineke Neutel; Svetlana Skurtveit; Christian Berg; Solveig Sakshaug
Journal:  J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-07

3.  A signal detection approach to patient-doctor communication and doctor-shopping behaviour among Japanese patients.

Authors:  Akihito Hagihara; Kimio Tarumi; Misato Odamaki; Koichi Nobutomo
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Assessment of abuse potential of benzodiazepines from a prescription database using 'doctor shopping' as an indicator.

Authors:  Vincent Pradel; Catherine Delga; Frank Rouby; Joëlle Micallef; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Assessment of abuse of tianeptine from a reimbursement database using 'doctor-shopping' as an indicator.

Authors:  Frank Rouby; Vincent Pradel; Elisabeth Frauger; Vanessa Pauly; François Natali; Patrick Reggio; Xavier Thirion; Joëlle Micallef
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.748

6.  Doctor shopping: a phenomenon of many themes.

Authors:  Randy A Sansone; Lori A Sansone
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-11

7.  Assessment of doctor-shopping for high dosage buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a French region: development of a new method for prescription database.

Authors:  Vincent Pradel; Xavier Thirion; Eléonore Ronfle; Alain Masut; Joëlle Micallef; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Prevalence and determinants of pharmacy shopping behaviour.

Authors:  H Buurma; M L Bouvy; P A G M De Smet; A Floor-Schreudering; H G M Leufkens; A C G Egberts
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use among Disabled Adults.

Authors:  Ellen Meara; Jill R Horwitz; Wilson Powell; Lynn McClelland; Weiping Zhou; A James O'Malley; Nancy E Morden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Narcotic Use and Postoperative Doctor Shopping in the Orthopaedic Trauma Population.

Authors:  Brent J Morris; Justin W Zumsteg; Kristin R Archer; Brian Cash; Hassan R Mir
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing measures of centrality in bipartite patient-prescriber networks: A study of drug seeking for opioid analgesics.

Authors:  Kai-Cheng Yang; Brian Aronson; Meltem Odabas; Yong-Yeol Ahn; Brea L Perry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.