Ellen Meara1, Jill R Horwitz1, Wilson Powell1, Lynn McClelland1, Weiping Zhou1, A James O'Malley1, Nancy E Morden1. 1. From the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH (E.M., W.P., W.Z., A.J.O., N.E.M.); the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (E.M., J.R.H.); and the UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles (J.R.H., L.M.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In response to rising rates of opioid abuse and overdose, U.S. states enacted laws to restrict the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. The effect of these laws on opioid use is unclear. METHODS: We tested associations between prescription-opioid receipt and state controlled-substances laws. Using Medicare administrative data for fee-for-service disabled beneficiaries 21 to 64 years of age who were alive throughout the calendar year (8.7 million person-years from 2006 through 2012) and an original data set of laws (e.g., prescription-drug monitoring programs), we examined the annual prevalence of beneficiaries with four or more opioid prescribers, prescriptions yielding a daily morphine-equivalent dose (MED) of more than 120 mg, and treatment for nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We estimated how opioid outcomes varied according to eight types of laws. RESULTS: From 2006 through 2012, states added 81 controlled-substance laws. Opioid receipt and potentially hazardous prescription patterns were common. In 2012 alone, 47% of beneficiaries filled opioid prescriptions (25% in one to three calendar quarters and 22% in every calendar quarter); 8% had four or more opioid prescribers; 5% had prescriptions yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg in any calendar quarter; and 0.3% were treated for a nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We observed no significant associations between opioid outcomes and specific types of laws or the number of types enacted. For example, the percentage of beneficiaries with a prescription yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg did not decline after adoption of a prescription-drug monitoring program (0.27 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of controlled-substance laws was not associated with reductions in potentially hazardous use of opioids or overdose among disabled Medicare beneficiaries, a population particularly at risk. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).
BACKGROUND: In response to rising rates of opioid abuse and overdose, U.S. states enacted laws to restrict the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. The effect of these laws on opioid use is unclear. METHODS: We tested associations between prescription-opioid receipt and state controlled-substances laws. Using Medicare administrative data for fee-for-service disabled beneficiaries 21 to 64 years of age who were alive throughout the calendar year (8.7 million person-years from 2006 through 2012) and an original data set of laws (e.g., prescription-drug monitoring programs), we examined the annual prevalence of beneficiaries with four or more opioid prescribers, prescriptions yielding a daily morphine-equivalent dose (MED) of more than 120 mg, and treatment for nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We estimated how opioid outcomes varied according to eight types of laws. RESULTS: From 2006 through 2012, states added 81 controlled-substance laws. Opioid receipt and potentially hazardous prescription patterns were common. In 2012 alone, 47% of beneficiaries filled opioid prescriptions (25% in one to three calendar quarters and 22% in every calendar quarter); 8% had four or more opioid prescribers; 5% had prescriptions yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg in any calendar quarter; and 0.3% were treated for a nonfatal prescription-opioid overdose. We observed no significant associations between opioid outcomes and specific types of laws or the number of types enacted. For example, the percentage of beneficiaries with a prescription yielding a daily MED of more than 120 mg did not decline after adoption of a prescription-drug monitoring program (0.27 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of controlled-substance laws was not associated with reductions in potentially hazardous use of opioids or overdose among disabled Medicare beneficiaries, a population particularly at risk. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).
Authors: Nancy E Morden; Jeffrey C Munson; Carrie H Colla; Jonathan S Skinner; Julie P W Bynum; Weiping Zhou; Ellen Meara Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Gail D'Onofrio; Patrick G O'Connor; Michael V Pantalon; Marek C Chawarski; Susan H Busch; Patricia H Owens; Steven L Bernstein; David A Fiellin Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth M Stone; Lainie Rutkow; Mark C Bicket; Colleen L Barry; G Caleb Alexander; Emma E McGinty Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Yong-Fang Kuo; Mukaila A Raji; Victor Liaw; Jacques Baillargeon; James S Goodwin Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-04-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sara E Heins; Mark J Sorbero; Christopher M Jones; Andrew W Dick; Bradley D Stein Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Walid F Gellad; Xinhua Zhao; Carolyn T Thorpe; Joshua M Thorpe; Florentina E Sileanu; John P Cashy; Maria Mor; Jennifer A Hale; Thomas Radomski; Leslie R M Hausmann; Michael J Fine; Chester B Good Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Yuhua Bao; Katherine Wen; Phyllis Johnson; Philip J Jeng; Zachary F Meisel; Bruce R Schackman Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 6.301