Literature DB >> 34225046

Investigation of an immobilization process for PFAS contaminated soils.

Edwin Barth1, John McKernan2, Diana Bless3, Kavitha Dasu4.   

Abstract

A two-phased bench-scale study was conducted to evaluate various sorbents for possible use as chemical stabilizing agents, along with cement solidification, for possible use in an in-situ solidification/stabilization (immobilization) treatment process for per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) contaminated soils. The first phase involved sorption experiments for six selected PFAS compounds diluted in a water solution, using five selected sorbents: granular activated carbon (GAC), activated carbon-clay blend, modified clay, biochar, iron (Fe)-amended biochar, and Ottawa sand as a control media. The second phase involved chemical stabilization treatment (via sorption), using the most effective sorbent identified in the first phase, followed by solidification of two soils from PFAS-contaminated sites. Physical solidification was achieved by adding cement as a binding agent. Results from the first phase (sorption experiments) indicated that GAC was slightly more successful than the other sorbents in sorption performance for a 3000 μg/L solution containing a mixture of the six selected PFAS analytes (500 μg/L concentration each of shorter- and longer-chain alkyl acids), and was the only sorbent used in the second phase of this study. While the GAC, activated carbon-clay blend, and modified clay sorbents showed similar sorption performance for the longer chain analytes tested, both the activated carbon-clay blend and modified clay, exhibited slightly less sorptive capacity than GAC for the shorter-chain alkyl acids. Immobilization effectiveness was evaluated by soil leachability testing using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1312, Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) on the samples collected from two PFAS-contaminated sites. For the majority of the PFAS soil analytes, the addition of GAC sorbent (chemical stabilization) substantially reduced the leachability of PFAS compounds from the contaminated soil samples, and the addition of cement as a physical binding agent (solidification) further decreased leachability for a few of the PFAS compounds. Overall immobilization of PFAS analytes that were detectable in the leachate from two PFAS contaminated soils ranged from 87.1% to 99.9%. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider that the laboratory testing results presented here may have application to further pilot or limited field-scale studies within a broader suite of PFAS-contaminated site treatment options that are currently available for treating PFAS contaminated soils. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immobilization; Leaching. carbon; PFAS; PFOA; PFOS; Remediation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34225046      PMCID: PMC8682492          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   8.910


  17 in total

1.  Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Surface modification of activated carbon for enhanced adsorption of perfluoroalkyl acids from aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Yue Zhi; Jinxia Liu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Laboratory-scale and pilot-scale stabilization and solidification (S/S) remediation of soil contaminated with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs).

Authors:  Mattias Sörengård; Pablo Gago-Ferrero; Dan B Kleja; Lutz Ahrens
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Perfluoroalkyl substances in a firefighting training ground (FTG), distribution and potential future release.

Authors:  Christine Baduel; Christopher J Paxman; Jochen F Mueller
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  The Challenges of PFAS Remediation.

Authors:  Ramona Darlington; Edwin Barth; John McKernan
Journal:  Mil Eng       Date:  2018-01-01

6.  Comprehensive retention model for PFAS transport in subsurface systems.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Ni Yan; Sarah Van Glubt; Yake Wang; Wei Chen; Ying Lyu; Barry Dungan; Kenneth C Carroll; F Omar Holguin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Subsurface transport potential of perfluoroalkyl acids at aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)-impacted sites.

Authors:  Jennifer L Guelfo; Christopher P Higgins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Treatment of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in U.S. full-scale water treatment systems.

Authors:  Timothy D Appleman; Christopher P Higgins; Oscar Quiñones; Brett J Vanderford; Chad Kolstad; Janie C Zeigler-Holady; Eric R V Dickenson
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Thyroid function and perfluoroalkyl acids in children living near a chemical plant.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Lopez-Espinosa; Debapriya Mondal; Ben Armstrong; Michael S Bloom; Tony Fletcher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Complete mineralization of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by γ-irradiation in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Ze Zhang; Jie-Jie Chen; Xian-Jin Lyu; Hao Yin; Guo-Ping Sheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment.

Authors:  Marina G Evich; Mary J B Davis; James P McCord; Brad Acrey; Jill A Awkerman; Detlef R U Knappe; Andrew B Lindstrom; Thomas F Speth; Caroline Tebes-Stevens; Mark J Strynar; Zhanyun Wang; Eric J Weber; W Matthew Henderson; John W Washington
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Field-Scale Demonstration of PFAS Leachability Following In Situ Soil Stabilization.

Authors:  Jeffrey T McDonough; Richard H Anderson; Johnsie R Lang; David Liles; Kasey Matteson; Theresa Olechiw
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.