Literature DB >> 23566120

Subsurface transport potential of perfluoroalkyl acids at aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)-impacted sites.

Jennifer L Guelfo1, Christopher P Higgins.   

Abstract

Subsurface transport potential of a suite of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) was studied in batch sorption experiments with various soils and in the presence of co-contaminants relevant to aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)-impacted sites. Specifically, PFAA sorption to multiple soils in the presence of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) and nonfluorinated AFFF surfactants was examined. This study is the first to report on sorption of perfluorobutanoate (PFBA) and perfluoropentanoate (PFPeA) (log Koc = 1.88 and 1.37, respectively) and found that sorption of these compounds does not follow the chain-length dependent trend observed for longer chain-length PFAAs. Sorption of PFBA was similar to that of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA, log Koc = 1.89). NAPL and nonfluorinated AFFF surfactants all had varying impacts on sorption of longer chain (>6 CF2 groups) PFAAs. The primary impact of NAPL was observed in low foc soil (soil A) where Freundlich n-values increased when NAPL was present. Impacts of nonfluorinated AFFF surfactants varied with surfactant and soil. The anionic surfactant sodium decyl sulfate (SDS) illicited PFAA chain-length dependent impacts in two negatively charged soils with varying foc. In soil A, Kd values for perfluoroheptanoate (PFHpA) increased 91% with SDS, whereas values for perfluorodecanoate (PFDA) increased only 28%. An amphoteric surfactant, n,n-dimethyldodecylamine n-oxide (AO), had the most notable impact on PFAA sorption to a positively charged soil (soil C). In this soil, AO oxide significantly increased sorption for the longer chain PFAAs (i.e., 528% increase in Kd for PFDA). Changes in sorption caused by SDS and AO may be due to mixed hemimicelle formation, competitive sorption, or changes to PFAA solubility. Short-chain PFAA behavior in the presence of NAPL, SDS, and AO was again notable. Co-contaminants generally increased the sorption of these compounds to all soils. Log Kd values of PFBA in soil A increased 85%, 372%, and 32% in the presence of NAPL, SDS, and AO, respectively. Use of Kd values to calculate retardation factors (Rf) of PFAAs demonstrates the variability of co-contaminant impacts on PFAA transport. Whereas NAPL and nonfluorinated surfactants decreased the sorption of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) at lower PFOS concentrations (1 μg/L), they led to increases in sorption at higher PFOS concentrations (500 μg/L). These results demonstrate that PFAA groundwater transport will depend on the solid phase characteristics as well as PFAA concentration and chain length. Detailed site-specific information will likely be needed to accurately predict PFAA transport at AFFF-impacted sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23566120     DOI: 10.1021/es3048043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  31 in total

1.  Nonideal Transport and Extended Elution Tailing of PFOS in Soil.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Naima Khan; Yake Wang; Ni Yan; Sarah Van Glubt; Kenneth C Carroll
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Evaluation of a national data set for insights into sources, composition, and concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in U.S. drinking water.

Authors:  Jennifer L Guelfo; David T Adamson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Adsorption of PFOA at the Air-Water Interface during Transport in Unsaturated Porous Media.

Authors:  Ying Lyu; Mark L Brusseau; Wei Chen; Ni Yan; Xiaori Fu; Xueyu Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Identification of the source of PFOS and PFOA contamination at a military air base site.

Authors:  Victor A Arias E; Megharaj Mallavarapu; Ravi Naidu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Simulating PFAS transport influenced by rate-limited multi-process retention.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Estimating the relative magnitudes of adsorption to solid-water and air/oil-water interfaces for per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Comprehensive retention model for PFAS transport in subsurface systems.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Ni Yan; Sarah Van Glubt; Yake Wang; Wei Chen; Ying Lyu; Barry Dungan; Kenneth C Carroll; F Omar Holguin
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Contribution of Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids to the Retention and Transport of Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Porous Media.

Authors:  Sarah Van Glubt; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Remediation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize or to degrade?

Authors:  Nanthi Bolan; Binoy Sarkar; Yubo Yan; Qiao Li; Hasintha Wijesekara; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Daniel C W Tsang; Marina Schauerte; Julian Bosch; Hendrik Noll; Yong Sik Ok; Kirk Scheckel; Jurate Kumpiene; Kapish Gobindlal; Melanie Kah; Jonathan Sperry; M B Kirkham; Hailong Wang; Yiu Fai Tsang; Deyi Hou; Jörg Rinklebe
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 10.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.