| Literature DB >> 34222502 |
Seyyed-Javad Hosseini-Shokouh1, Rahim Ali Sheikhi2, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini3, Parisa Moradimajd4.
Abstract
The biotechnology revolution and the emergence of new ways to change the genetic material of an organism have led to an increased risk of biological wars. Coping strategies against these threats is very important to improve the health of people. Therefore, due to the importance of this issue, this study is aimed to review the scope of using biotechnology and genetic engineering in wars and coping strategies in all over the world. In this review study, database includes of PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Science Direct were searched. The search was limited to reviewed articles in English published between 1990 and 2020. The primary search results generated 148 relevant references. After eliminating the duplicates and articles which were not related to the review of the abstract, 11 references were identified for inclusion in this review. Based on the results of these studies, the advances in genetic engineering can lead to the development of new weapons for other types of conflict and war scenarios, secret operations, and sabotage activities. Rapid developments in biotechnology and genetics have created environmental, ethical, political, and social challenges for many communities. Increasing awareness and sensitivity, monitoring, and building capacity for effective coping are essential. Biotechnology areas that will probably significantly contribute to countering biological weapons include recognizing the human genome, strengthening the immune system, identifying bacteria and viruses' genome, equipment for biological identification, new vaccines, new antibiotics, and anti-viral drugs must be monitored. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Biologic threat; biologic warfare; biotechnology; genetic engineering
Year: 2021 PMID: 34222502 PMCID: PMC8224508 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_717_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
PubMed search strategy
| Keywords |
|---|
| Keywords relating to biological weapons |
Figure 1Flow chart of manuscript selection process PRISMA 2009
Characteristics of selected studies
| Reference Title | Authors | Year published | Aim | Conclusion and recommendations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Genomics and future biological weapons: the need for preventive action by the biomedical community | Claire M. Fraser1 and Malcolm R. Dando | 2001 | Evaluate trends in genomics research and development and capabilities might be misused in the design of new bioweapons | The genomics revolution holds great promise for the advancement of basic biology, medicine and agriculture |
| [ | The biotechnology revolution: The science and applications | Nixdorff K, Brauburger J, Hahlbohm D | 2000 | Unclear | Biotechnology has since been revolutionized by molecular biology and genetic engineering, and any modern account has to take these developments into consideration |
| [ | Synthetic biology and biosecurity: challenging the “myths”. Frontiers in public health | Jefferson C, Lentzos F, Marris C | 2014 | Show that the importance of tacit knowledge is commonly overlooked in the dominant narrative: the focus is on access to biological materials and digital information | Public discourse on synthetic biology and biosecurity tends to portray speculative scenarios about the future as realities in the present or the near future, when this is not warranted |
| [ | Directed evolution of proteins by exon shuffling | Kolkman JA, Stemmer WP | 2001 | Unclear | Developing in vitro formats for exon shuffling and applying these to the directed evolution of proteins |
| [ | Gene mapping in the 20th and 21st centuries: statistical methods, data analysis, and experimental design | Terwilliger JD, Göring HH | 2009 | Review the theory and practice of gene mapping at the close of the 20th century | Propose a new focus in the field of statistical genetics that more explicitly highlights the primacy of study design as the means to increase power for gene mapping |
| [ | Bioterrorism—preparing to fight the next war | Relman DA | 2006 | Unclear | Now is the time to begin making serious, sustained investments in the science and technology on which we can build agile defenses against an ever-evolving spectrum of biologic threats |
| [ | Biological terrorism | Simon JD | 1997 | Unclear | By improving our readiness to respond to biological terrorism, many lives can be saved and terrorists denied their goal of creating panic and crisis throughout the country |
| [ | Biological terrorism: understanding the threat, preparation, and medical response | Franz DR, Zajtchuk R | 2002 | Unclear | If done correctly, preparation for a biological attack will be as “dual use” as the facility that produced the weapon |
| [ | Emerging and readily available technologies and national security: A framework for addressing ethical, legal, and societal issues | Chameau J-L, Ballhaus WF, Lin H | 2014 | Articulates a framework for policy makers, institutions, and individual researchers | Merging and readily available technologies and national Security makes an essential contribution to incorporate the full consideration of ethical, legal, and societal issues in situations where rapid technological change may outpace our ability to foresee consequences |
| [ | Field applications of genetically engineered microorganisms for bioremediation processes. current opinion in biotechnology | Sayler GS, Ripp S | 2000 | Unclear | Essential that field studies be performed to acquire the requisite information for determining the overall effectiveness and risks associated with GEM introduction into natural ecosystems |
| [ | Closing loopholes in the biological weapons convention | Van Aken J, Hammond E | 2002 | Provides two examples of research that exploit perceived loopholes in the BTWC or impinge on the scope of the Convention | TWC or impinge on the scope of the convention, namely the planned use of biological agents for forced drug eradication and the development of anti-material agents |
GEM=Genetic engineering microorganisms, TWC=Taylor woodrow construction, BTWC=Biologic taylor woodrow construction
Figure 2Coping strategies against biological threats