Literature DB >> 11687792

Genomics and future biological weapons: the need for preventive action by the biomedical community.

C M Fraser1, M R Dando.   

Abstract

There is an increasing concern within both the scientific and security communities that the ongoing revolution in biology has great potential to be misused in offensive biological weapons programs. In light of the 11 September tragedy, we can no longer afford to be complacent about the possibility of biological terrorism. Here we review the major relevant trends in genomics research and development, and discuss how these capabilities might be misused in the design of new bioweapons. We also discuss how the breakthroughs that have come from the genomics revolution may be used to enhance detection, protection and treatment so that biological warfare agents are never used.

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; War and Human Rights Abuses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687792     DOI: 10.1038/ng763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  13 in total

1.  Genetic engineering and biological weapons. New technologies, desires and threats from biological research.

Authors:  Jan van Aken; Edward Hammond
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin alters regulation of visceral sympathetic nerve discharge.

Authors:  A A Garcia; R J Fels; L J Mosher; M J Kenney
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-11-23

3.  Toll-like receptor 4 knockout protects against anthrax lethal toxin-induced cardiac contractile dysfunction: role of autophagy.

Authors:  Machender R Kandadi; Arthur E Frankel; Jun Ren
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Viability of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus thuringiensis spores as a model for predicting the fate of bacillus anthracis spores during composting of dead livestock.

Authors:  Tim Reuter; Trevor W Alexander; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Bioterrorism, embryonic stem cells, and Frankenstein.

Authors:  Patrick Guinan
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2002

6.  Coding ethical behaviour: the challenges of biological weapons.

Authors:  Brian Rappert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.777

7.  Interferon-inducible CXC chemokines directly contribute to host defense against inhalational anthrax in a murine model of infection.

Authors:  Matthew A Crawford; Marie D Burdick; Ian J Glomski; Anne E Boyer; John R Barr; Borna Mehrad; Robert M Strieter; Molly A Hughes
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.823

Review 8.  The biological weapons threats and coping strategies for health promotion.

Authors:  Seyyed-Javad Hosseini-Shokouh; Rahim Ali Sheikhi; Seyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini; Parisa Moradimajd
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Cardiac-specific catalase overexpression rescues anthrax lethal toxin-induced cardiac contractile dysfunction: role of oxidative stress and autophagy.

Authors:  Machender R Kandadi; Xuejun Yu; Arthur E Frankel; Jun Ren
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Why has Not There been More Research of Concern?

Authors:  Brian Rappert
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.