Literature DB >> 34220294

Systems Cytogenomics: Are We Ready Yet?

Ivan Y Iourov1,2,3, Svetlana G Vorsanova1,2, Yuri B Yurov1,2.   

Abstract

With the introduction of systems theory to genetics, numerous opportunities for genomic research have been identified. Consequences of DNA sequence variations are systematically evaluated using the network- or pathway-based analysis, a technological basis of systems biology or, more precisely, systems genomics. Despite comprehensive descriptions of advantages offered by systems genomic approaches, pathway-based analysis is uncommon in cytogenetic (cytogenomic) studies, i.e. genome analysis at the chromosomal level. Here, we would like to express our opinion that current cytogenomics benefits from the application of systems biology methodology. Accordingly, systems cytogenomics appears to be a biomedical area requiring more attention than it actually receives.
© 2021 Bentham Science Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytogenomics; DNA sequence; chromosome; genome; pathway; systems biology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34220294      PMCID: PMC8188578          DOI: 10.2174/1389202922666210219112419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Genomics        ISSN: 1389-2029            Impact factor:   2.236


INTRODUCTION

Systems genomics is an important part of current bioscience, providing evidence-based theoretical and empirical discoveries [1, 2]. However, systems genomics approaches are rarely used in cytogenetic/cytogenomic research (i.e., genome analysis at chromosomal and subchromosomal levels) regardless of the proven efficiency and applicability [3]. In the post-genomic era, data analysis by systems biology (bioinformatic) techniques has become a key contributor to the success of a study dedicated to genome biology/ medicine [4, 5]. Pathway-based views on genome variability enhance significantly our understanding of the role played by genomic variations in health and disease [6, 7]. Indeed, network analysis of macromolecular interactions using data on sequence variations highlights molecular and cellular mechanisms for human diseases [8, 9]. At chromosomal and/or subchromosomal levels, systems biology approaches targeting genome variability seem to be more sophisticated because of the involvement of large genomic loci (chromosome abnormalities simultaneously affect numerous co-localized genes). Nonetheless, pathway-based techniques are effectively applicable to chromosomal imbalances and copy number variations (CNV), providing exciting results for basic and diagnostic research (reviewed recently in [10]). Additionally, systems genomics has been used as a platform for single-cell genomic (cytogenomic) analysis for studying intercellular genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic variability [11, 12]. Thus, systems genomic analysis may be consi-dered as an important tool for cytogenetic (molecular cytogenetic) and cytogenomic research. Genomic variations at chromosomal and subchromosomal levels are the commonest genetic cause of human mortality and morbidity [13, 14]. In silico methods have been systematically used for the development of techniques for detecting chromosomal imbalances [15-17]. However, studies investigating chromosomal and subchromosomal imbalances using systems biology techniques are exclusive [10]. Nonetheless, approaches to determine the phenotypic outcome of microscopic and submicroscopic genome variations are available (i.e., CNV prioritization; pathway-based phenome analysis in patients with chromosomal abnormalities) [18]. Numerous gene prioritization methods are able to be adopted for analyzing large sets of co-localized genes affected by a chromosome imbalance [19, 20]. Furthermore, systems biology analysis of chromosomal behavior and variations has been successfully applied for studying genome organization in interphase nuclei, somatic genome evolution in cancer, phylogenetic genome evolution, and DNA damage response [21-24]. More excitedly, systems genomics approaches to diseases caused by chromosomal imbalances provide opportunities for treating these presumably incurable conditions [25]. Bioinformatic analyses have been systematically proposed as a valuable tool for diagnostic cytogenomic research [26, 27]. In total, understanding of disease mechanisms mediated by chromosome abnormalities and/or instability does require systems genomics (cytogenomics) methodology [28]. However, systems genomics analysis is uncommonly used in molecular cytogenetic and cytogenomic research, as mentioned previously. It is highly likely that this problem persists because of the lack of comprehensive workflows in systems cytogenomics. Consequently, we have endeavored to develop one. Using the results of cytogenomic/bioinformatic research obtained by our colleagues [29, 30] and us [10, 18, 25, 31-34], we have introduced systems cytogenomics workflow, which is schematically shown in Fig. (). Briefly, cytogenetic analysis (single-cell visualization/microscopic whole-genome analysis at the chromosomal level albeit at low resolution) and cytogenomic analysis (whole-genome analysis of chromosomal imbalances and CNV at the molecular level) generate two data sets, which are useful for unco- vering CNV, chromosomal abnormalities/instability/variants. Systems biology analysis is then applied for the pathway-based classification in a gene-centric way. In the present workflow, the classification is an in silico modulation of potential consequences of the genomic variations at transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome levels for prioritizing CNV and candidate processes. Once classification is successfully performed, the knowledge regarding disease mechanisms, susceptibility to multifactorial diseases or phenotypic properties, alterations to the maintenance of genome stability (i.e., molecular causes of chromosome instability if uncovered by cytogenetic analysis), etc. can be obtained. Certainly, there may be alternative systems cytogenomics workflows. Still, this one has been already found applicable in basic and diagnostic research [10, 12, 18, 25, 31, 32]. One may further suggest this workflow to include data sets obtained by next-generation sequencing, which complement systems knowledge on genomic variability at the DNA level and the functional consequences. The achievements in genomics and systems biology have become the essence of systems medicine. The latter has recently become an integrated part of biomedical research and molecular diagnostics. A series of studies have already demonstrated that systems genomics methodology increases the potential of health care and bioscience research [35-37]. Cytogenomics and molecular cytogenetics empowered by systems biology methodology represent a new chapter in the global genetic odyssey - systems cytogenomics. Studies performed using systems cytogenomics methodology are able to provide valuable data, the use of which is important for uncovering new disease mechanisms and creating therapeutic opportunities (personalized treatment) [10, 38]. The proposed workflow may certainly help in the development and applicability of this area of genome and chromosome research. Obviously, the described systems cytogenomics workflow may be expanded. In our opinion, the expansion of systems cytogenomics workflow would include sequencing data and the analysis by systems genomics methods [1, 2, 11]. In addition, one has is to be aware of current achievements in 3D genomics (spatial-dependent genome behavior in interphase nuclei) [39, 40], which could also be included in a systems cytogenomics workflow.

CONCLUSION

The present opinion article aimed at providing a brief overview of systems genomics in the light of cytogenomic and cytogenetic (chromosome) research. As one may see, these biomedical fields benefit from the use of systems biology methods. We do believe that our work will help to promote systems cytogenomics, and it will receive more attention than it actually does.
  34 in total

Review 1.  Single cell analysis: the new frontier in 'omics'.

Authors:  Daojing Wang; Steven Bodovitz
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 2.  Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison.

Authors:  Roded Sharan; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Chromosome Dynamics in Response to DNA Damage.

Authors:  Andrew Seeber; Michael H Hauer; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 4.  Clinical implications of omics and systems medicine: focus on predictive and individualized treatment.

Authors:  M Benson
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Pathway-based classification of cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Shinuk Kim; Mark Kon; Charles DeLisi
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.540

6.  The emerging genomics and systems biology research lead to systems genomics studies.

Authors:  Mary Qu Yang; Kenji Yoshigoe; William Yang; Weida Tong; Xiang Qin; A Dunker; Zhongxue Chen; Hamid R Arbania; Jun S Liu; Andrzej Niemierko; Jack Y Yang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Cytopostgenomics: What is it and how does it work?

Authors:  Ivan Y Iourov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  Dynamic nature of somatic chromosomal mosaicism, genetic-environmental interactions and therapeutic opportunities in disease and aging.

Authors:  Svetlana G Vorsanova; Yuri B Yurov; Ivan Y Iourov
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  European guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic analysis.

Authors:  Marisa Silva; Nicole de Leeuw; Kathy Mann; Heleen Schuring-Blom; Sian Morgan; Daniela Giardino; Katrina Rack; Ros Hastings
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Somatic mosaicism in the diseased brain.

Authors:  Ivan Y Iourov; Svetlana G Vorsanova; Oxana S Kurinnaia; Sergei I Kutsev; Yuri B Yurov
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Svetlana G. Vorsanova (1945-2021).

Authors:  Ivan Y Iourov
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.904

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.