Paolo Palmisciano1, Ali S Haider2, Chibueze D Nwagwu3, Waseem Wahood4, Salah G Aoun5, Kalil G Abdullah5, Tarek Y El Ahmadieh6. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Trauma Center, Gamma Knife Center, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy. 2. Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA. 5. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. 6. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. telahmadieh@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Radiation necrosis (RN) represents a serious post-radiotherapy complication in patients with brain metastases. Bevacizumab and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) are viable treatment options, but direct comparative data is scarce. We reviewed the literature to compare the two treatment strategies. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. All studies of patients with RN from brain metastases treated with bevacizumab or LITT were included. Treatment outcomes were analyzed using indirect meta-analysis with random-effect modeling. RESULTS: Among the 18 studies included, 143 patients received bevacizumab and 148 underwent LITT. Both strategies were equally effective in providing post-treatment symptomatic improvement (P = 0.187, I2 = 54.8%), weaning off steroids (P = 0.614, I2 = 25.5%), and local lesion control (P = 0.5, I2 = 0%). Mean number of lesions per patient was not statistically significant among groups (P = 0.624). Similarly, mean T1-contrast-enhancing pre-treatment volumes were not statistically different (P = 0.582). Patterns of radiological responses differed at 6-month follow-ups, with rates of partial regression significantly higher in the bevacizumab group (P = 0.001, I2 = 88.9%), and stable disease significantly higher in the LITT group (P = 0.002, I2 = 81.9%). Survival rates were superior in the LITT cohort, and statistical significance was reached at 18 months (P = 0.038, I2 = 73.7%). Low rates of adverse events were reported in both groups (14.7% for bevacizumab and 12.2% for LITT). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab and LITT can be safe and effective treatments for RN from brain metastases. Clinical and radiological outcomes are mostly comparable, but LITT may relate with superior survival benefits in select patients. Further studies are required to identify the best patient candidates for each treatment group.
PURPOSE: Radiation necrosis (RN) represents a serious post-radiotherapy complication in patients with brain metastases. Bevacizumab and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) are viable treatment options, but direct comparative data is scarce. We reviewed the literature to compare the two treatment strategies. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched. All studies of patients with RN from brain metastases treated with bevacizumab or LITT were included. Treatment outcomes were analyzed using indirect meta-analysis with random-effect modeling. RESULTS: Among the 18 studies included, 143 patients received bevacizumab and 148 underwent LITT. Both strategies were equally effective in providing post-treatment symptomatic improvement (P = 0.187, I2 = 54.8%), weaning off steroids (P = 0.614, I2 = 25.5%), and local lesion control (P = 0.5, I2 = 0%). Mean number of lesions per patient was not statistically significant among groups (P = 0.624). Similarly, mean T1-contrast-enhancing pre-treatment volumes were not statistically different (P = 0.582). Patterns of radiological responses differed at 6-month follow-ups, with rates of partial regression significantly higher in the bevacizumab group (P = 0.001, I2 = 88.9%), and stable disease significantly higher in the LITT group (P = 0.002, I2 = 81.9%). Survival rates were superior in the LITT cohort, and statistical significance was reached at 18 months (P = 0.038, I2 = 73.7%). Low rates of adverse events were reported in both groups (14.7% for bevacizumab and 12.2% for LITT). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab and LITT can be safe and effective treatments for RN from brain metastases. Clinical and radiological outcomes are mostly comparable, but LITT may relate with superior survival benefits in select patients. Further studies are required to identify the best patient candidates for each treatment group.
Authors: Dhiego Chaves de Almeida Bastos; Jeffrey Weinberg; Vinodh A Kumar; David T Fuentes; Jason Stafford; Jing Li; Ganesh Rao; Sujit S Prabhu Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Andrew E Sloan; Faith G Davis; Fawn D Vigneau; Ping Lai; Raymond E Sawaya Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Denise Bernhardt; Laila König; Anca-L Grosu; Stefan Rieken; Sandro M Krieg; Wolfgang Wick; Benedikt Wiestler; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Felix Sahm; Jens Gempt; Bernhard Meyer; Bernd J Krause; Cordula Petersen; Rainer Fietkau; Michael Thomas; Frank Giordano; Andrea Wittig-Sauerwein; Jürgen Debus; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Peter Hau; Joachim Steinbach; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Paolo Palmisciano; Ali S Haider; Kishore Balasubramanian; Randy S D'Amico; Alla Gabriella Wernicke Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Paolo Palmisciano; Gianluca Ferini; Christian Ogasawara; Waseem Wahood; Othman Bin Alamer; Aditya D Gupta; Gianluca Scalia; Alexandra M G Larsen; Kenny Yu; Giuseppe E Umana; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Ali S Haider Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Paolo Palmisciano; Ali S Haider; Mohammadmahdi Sabahi; Chibueze D Nwagwu; Othman Bin Alamer; Gianluca Scalia; Giuseppe E Umana; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Kenny Yu; Omar N Pathmanaban Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Leonardo Tariciotti; Valerio M Caccavella; Giorgio Fiore; Luigi Schisano; Giorgio Carrabba; Stefano Borsa; Martina Giordano; Paolo Palmisciano; Giulia Remoli; Luigi Gianmaria Remore; Mauro Pluderi; Manuela Caroli; Giorgio Conte; Fabio Triulzi; Marco Locatelli; Giulio Bertani Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Paolo Palmisciano; Gianluca Ferini; Ramlah Khan; Othman Bin-Alamer; Giuseppe E Umana; Kenny Yu; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Ali S Haider Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-09-04 Impact factor: 6.575