| Literature DB >> 34217303 |
Mahla Ghorbani1,2, Marjan Azghandi2,3, Mohammad Amin Kerachian4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methylation plays an important role in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis. The goal of this study was to identify aberrantly differentially methylated genes (DMGs) and pathways through bioinformatics analysis among Iranian CRC patients using Methylation Next Generation Sequencing.Entities:
Keywords: Colon adenocarcinoma; Diagnostic; Epigenetic; In silico; Methylation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34217303 PMCID: PMC8255023 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02053-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Clinicopathological characteristics of 6 CRC samples matched with normal controls
| ID | Age | Sex | Drug | Smoking | Hubble-bubble | Location of tumor | Grade | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65T | 56 | Male | Yes | Yes | No | Cecum | 2 | Well differentiated Adenocarcinoma |
| 16N | 60 | Male | Yes | No | No | Cecum | 2 | |
| 20T | 59 | Male | No | No | No | Cecum | 2 | Adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated |
| 4N | 56 | Male | No | No | No | Cecum | 2 | |
| 31T | 61 | Male | Yes | Yes | No | Sigmoid | 2 | Adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated |
| 10N | 60 | Male | Yes | Yes | No | Sigmoid | 2 | |
| 35T | 71 | Male | No | No | No | Rectum | 2 | Adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated |
| 7N | 74 | Male | No | No | No | Rectum | 2 | |
| 45C | 69 | Male | No | No | No | Rectum | 2 | Adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated |
| 8N | 60 | Male | No | No | No | Rectum | 2 | |
| 67C | 70 | Male | No | No | No | Recto sigmoid | 2 | Adenocarcinoma, well differentiated |
| 14N | 76 | Male | No | No | No | Recto sigmoid | 2 |
Fig. 1GO-Enrichment Analysis of A hyper-methylated genes and B hypo-methylated genes
KEGG pathway analysis of the hyper-DMGs
| ID | Pathway description | Gene count | False discovery rate | Matching proteins in network (labels) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal cell carcinoma | 12 | 5.79E−07 | BMP2,FZD1,GLI3,TCF7,TCF7L1,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Hedgehog signaling | 11 | 1.25E−06 | BMP2,GAS1,GLI3,IHH,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Hedgehog signaling | 11 | 1.25E−06 | CTBP2,DKK1,FZD1,NFATC1,SFRP2,SFRP5,TCF7,TCF7L1,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Wnt signaling | 15 | 2.78E−05 | CREB3L1,FZD1,GNAS,TCF7,TCF7L1,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Melanogenesis | 12 | 9.14E−05 | BCL2,BMP2,COL4A2,CTBP2,FGF12,FGF3,FGFR1,FZD1,GLI3,IGF1R,JUP,PDGFRA,TCF7,TCF7L1,TGFB1,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Pathways in cancer | 22 | 0.00015 | BMP2,FZD1,PPP2R2A,STK3,TCF7,TCF7L1,TGFB1,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Hippo signaling | 14 | 0.000203 | CAV1,FGF12,FGF3,FGFR1,FZD1,IGF1R,IGF2,SDC2,TGFB1,TWIST2,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Proteoglycans in cancer | 17 | 0.000286 | CDK14,IGF1R,IGFBP3,JUP,MEIS1,NGFR,NR4A3,PAX7,SIX1,TLX3,WNT16,WT1 | |
| Transcriptional misregulation in cancer | 12 | 0.01 | BCL2,CREB3L1,CREB5,FGFR1,IGF1R,PDGFRA,TCF7,TCF7L1 | |
| Prostate cancer | 8 | 0.0177 | AVPR1A,CACNA1I,CD38,GNAS,GRIN2A,GRIN2C,ITPKB,NOS1,PDE1B,PDGFRA,TACR1 | |
| Calcium signaling | 11 | 0.0474 | CTBP2,DKK1,FZD1,NFATC1,SFRP2,SFRP5,TCF7,TCF7L1,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B | |
| Hedgehog signaling | 11 | 1.25E−06 | CREB3L1,FZD1,GNAS,TCF7,TCF7L1,WNT1,WNT16,WNT2,WNT3A,WNT5A,WNT6,WNT7B |
Fig. 2Ribosome pathway and matching genes in network. Our founded genes are marked by a bold box in the pathway
Fig. 3Top four modules of hyper and hypo-methylated genes; a–d 4 top modules
Fig. 4Wnt signaling pathway and matching genes in network. Our founded genes are marked by a bold box in the pathway
Fig. 5The survival analysis of four hub genes by the KM-plotter. a WNT2; b SFRP2; c ZNF726; d BMP2