| Literature DB >> 34215792 |
Aram Rezaei1, Ehsan Hashemi2,3.
Abstract
A pseudohomogeneous carrier as an emerging term refers to subnanometric carbon-based vehicle with a high ability to interact with genetic materials to form stableEntities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34215792 PMCID: PMC8253742 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93153-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic procedure for the synthesis of the Arginine-CQDs.
Figure 2(A) FT-IR spectra of the Arginine-CQDs, (B) UV–vis absorbance spectra of Arginine-CQDs, the inset shows the emission of Arginine-CQDs dissolved in DI water, (C) the emission spectra of Arginine-CQDs with increasing excitation wavelengths from 310 to 340 nm in 10 nm increments, and (D) the emission spectra of Arginine-CQDs with increasing excitation wavelengths from 350 to 390 nm in 10 nm increments.
Figure 3(A) The AFM image from Arginine-CQDs, (B) TEM image of the of Arginine-CQDs, (C) the 5 nm resolution TEM image of Arginine-CQDs, (D,E) FE-SEM images of Arginine-CQDs, (F) the EDX elemental mapping and distribution of C atoms, (G) the EDX elemental mapping and distribution of N atoms, and (H) the EDX elemental mapping and distribution of O atoms.
Figure 4(A) The XRD pattern of Arginine-CQDs, (B) zeta potential of naked DNA, chitosan, and Arginine-CQDs, (C) buffering capacity of chitosan and Arginine-CQDs, (D) gel retardation assay of chitosan, (E) gel retardation assay of Arginine-CQDs, at various weight ratio. Lane 1, W/W = 30; Lane 2, W/W = 40; Lane 3, W/W = 50; Lane 4, W/W = 70; Lane 5, pDNA; Lane 6, DNA marker.
Figure 5Fluorescence microscopy images of AGS cells transfected with (A) chitosan and (B) Arginine-CQDs at 50 nanocarrier/pDNA weight ratio (W/W). (C) PEI polymer at weight ratio of 1.5, (D) cytotoxicity of chitosan, Arginine-CQDs and PEI complex with pEGFP plasmid at W/W ratios of 30, 40, 50 and 70, (E) relative gene expression based on real-time PCR for treated cells with chitosan and Arginine-CQDs at W/W ratios of 30, 40, 50 and 70. PEI polymer was used as the positive control (W/W = 1.5) and naked DNA were used as negative control. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).