Literature DB >> 3421386

Evaluating the risks of cesarean section: low Apgar score in repeat C-section and vaginal deliveries.

R D Burt1, T L Vaughan, J R Daling.   

Abstract

Data from Washington State birth certificates from 1980-83 were used to estimate excess risk to the infant delivered via repeat cesarean section independently of any risk associated with the indication for the procedure. Using a case-control design, we compared the method of delivery of all infants with low (0-6) five-minute Apgar scores born to multiparous mothers after uncomplicated pregnancies and births to that of similar infants with a high score (7-10), frequency matched by birthweight. Of the 1,030 infants with low Apgar score, 127 (12.3 per cent) were delivered via repeat cesarean section, in contrast to 98 (9.8 per cent) of 998 controls with high Apgar score. In a regression model controlling for birthweight, gestational length, maternal age, and income the relative risk was 1.29 (95% confidence interval 0.97, 1.72). Excess risk was highest among babies of normal (2500-4000 grams) birthweight. While a number of limitations inherent in the source of data require cautious interpretation of these results, we conclude that some excess risk of low Apgar score may be associated with repeat cesarean section procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3421386      PMCID: PMC1349428          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Fetal compromise during elective cesarean section. II. A report from the Colloborative Project.

Authors:  R C Benson; H Berendes; W Weiss
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-10-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The frequency of complications in cesarean and noncesarean deliveries, 1970 and 1978.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Low Apgar scores and neonatal mortality.

Authors:  J M Miller; D H Levine; Y Michel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Birth complication reporting: the effect of birth certificate design.

Authors:  F Frost; P Starzyk; S George; J F McLaughlin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 9.308

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Risk of autism associated with general anesthesia during cesarean delivery: a population-based birth-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Li-Nien Chien; Hsiu-Chen Lin; Yu-Hsuan Joni Shao; Shu-Ti Chiou; Hung-Yi Chiou
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-04

2.  Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  Y Tony Yang; Michelle M Mello; S V Subramanian; David M Studdert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Antibiotic use during pregnancy: a retrospective study of prescription patterns and birth outcomes at an antenatal clinic in rural Ghana.

Authors:  Kwesi Boadu Mensah; Kwame Opoku-Agyeman; Charles Ansah
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2017-08-09

4.  Use of Antibiotic Treatment in Pregnancy and the Risk of Several Neonatal Outcomes: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Anna Cantarutti; Federico Rea; Matteo Franchi; Benedetta Beccalli; Anna Locatelli; Giovanni Corrao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.