| Literature DB >> 28808578 |
Kwesi Boadu Mensah1, Kwame Opoku-Agyeman1, Charles Ansah1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Babies are increasingly being exposed to antibiotics intrapartum in the bid to reduce neonatal and maternal deaths. Intrapartum antibiotic exposure, including even those considered safe in pregnancy, have been associated with childhood obesity and compromised immunity. Data on the extent of antibiotic use, safety and its impact on birth outcomes and neonatal health in Sub-Saharan Africa is very limited. This study sought to ascertain the extent of antibiotic use in pregnancy and its effects on birth outcomes in a rural hospital in Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: APGAR scores; Antibiotic; Birth outcomes; Birthweight; Congenital defects; Intrapartum; Pregnancy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28808578 PMCID: PMC5551012 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-017-0111-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Policy Pract ISSN: 2052-3211
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants
| Frequency | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Marital status | Married | 304 | 82.2 |
| Single | 66 | 17.8 | |
| Mothers age at birth | ≥19 | 56 | 13.7 |
| 20–30 | 251 | 61.4 | |
| ≤31 | 102 | 24.9 | |
| Occupation | Farmer | 126 | 34.3 |
| Trader | 78 | 21.3 | |
| Student | 43 | 11.7 | |
| Teacher | 8 | 2.2 | |
| Seamstress | 27 | 7.4 | |
| Hairdresser | 51 | 13.9 | |
| Nurse | 3 | .8 | |
| Unemployed | 27 | 7.4 | |
| Othersa | 4 | 1.0 | |
| Religious affiliation | Christian | 333 | 91.2 |
| Muslim | 24 | 6.6 | |
| Traditional | 8 | 2.2 | |
| GRAVIDA | 1–3 | 212 | 68.8 |
| ≤ 4 | 96 | 31.2 | |
| Total | 412 | 100.0 | |
aOthers include sprayer, baker, secretary and army officer
Fig. 1Antibiotic use during pregnancy during the different stages of pregnancy. 12 respondents received antibiotics at all stages of pregnancy. 141 did not received antibiotics at all. 13 received during the 1st and 2nd trimesters only. 47 received antibiotics during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters only. 14 respondents received during the 1st and 3rd trimesters only. 141 respondents were treated during the 3rd trimester
Antibiotic exposure in pregnant women of different socio economic class and mode of delivery
| Antibiotic exposure | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No Total | Statistics | |||
| Marital status | Married | 197(64.8%) | 107(35.2%) | 304 |
|
| Single | 44(66.7%) | 22(33.3%) | 66 | k = 0.83,OR = 0.97 | |
| Age of mother at birth | ≥ 19 | 32(57.1%) | 24(43.9%) | 43 |
|
| 20–30 | 167(66.5%) | 8(33.5%) | 238 | K = 2.058 | |
| ≤ 31 | 69(67.6%) | 33(32.4%) | 96 | ||
| Occupation | Employed | 182(64.6%) | 105(37.4%) | 126 |
|
| Student | 27(62.8%) | 16(37.2%) | 43 | ||
| Unemployed | 19(70.4%) | 8(29.6%) | 27 | ||
| Religion | Christian | 219(65.8%) | 114(34.2%) | 333 |
|
| Muslim | 15(62.5%) | 9(37.5%) | 24 | DF = 2 | |
| Traditional | 5(62.5%) | 3(37.5%) | 8 | ||
| GRAVIDA | 1–3 | 117(60.9% | 75(39.1%) | 192 |
|
| ≤4 | 67(72.0%) | 26(28.0%) | 93 | DF = 1 OR = 0.83 | |
| Method of delivery | C. SectioN | 104(94.5%) | 6(5.5%) | 110 |
|
| Vaginal | 167(55.3%) | 135(44.7%) | 302 | DF = 1 OR =13.8 | |
| Total |
|
|
| ||
Fig. 2Classes of antibiotic use and the trimester of exposure
Effect intrapartum antibiotic exposure on weight at birth
| Birth Weight | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean ± SD | ||
| Marital status | Married | 298 |
|
| Single | 65 | 2.75 ± 0.53 | |
| Age group | ≥19 | 55 |
|
| 20–30 | 242 | 2.95 ± 056 | |
| ≤31 | 100 | 3.10 ± 0.57 | |
| Occupational status | Employed | 287 |
|
| Student | 43 | 2.75 ± 0.58 | |
| Unemployed | 27 | 3.00 ± 0.47 | |
| Religion | Christian | 324 | 2.98 ± 0.57 |
| Muslim | 23 | 2.82 ± 0.48 | |
| Traditional | 8 | 2.88 ± 0.52 | |
| GRAVIDA | 1–3 | 206 |
|
| 4 And Above | 95 | 3.08 ± 0.57 | |
| Mode of delivery | Ceasarian section | 103 | 2.96 ± 0.59 |
| Vaginal delivery | 297 | 2.96 ± 0.55 | |
| Antibiotic exposure | Yes | 261 | 2.96 ± 0.58 |
| No | 139 | 2.97 ± 0.53 | |
Results represented as mean ± SD. * means p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001
Effect intrapartum antibiotic exposure on mean APGAR score
| APGAR Scores | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean ± SD | ||
| Marital status | Married | 282 |
|
| Single | 62 | 8.69 ± 0.90 | |
| Age groups | ≤19 | 53 |
|
| 20–30 | 232 | 8.41 ± 1.28 | |
| ≥31 | 93 | 8.10 ± 1.43 | |
| Occupational status | Employed | 272 | 8.32 ± 1.32 |
| Student | 41 | 8.40 ± 1.25 | |
| Unemployed | 25 | 8.48 ± 0.95 | |
| Religion | Christian | 311 | 8.33 ± 1.34 |
| Muslim | 21 | 8.43 ± 1.15 | |
| Traditional | 1 | 9.00 ± 0.00 | |
| GRAVIDA | 1–3 | 200 |
|
| ≥4 | 88 | 8.20 ± 1.27 | |
| Mode of delivery | Ceasarian section | 100 |
|
| Vaginal delivery | 281 | 8.47 ± 1.11 | |
| Antibiotic exposure | Yes | 248 | 8.30 ± 1.30 |
| No | 133 | 8.47 ± 1.26 | |
| Perinatal antibiotic exposure | Yes | 104 |
|
| No | 277 | 8.51 ± 1.07 |
Results represented as mean ± SD. *means p < 0.05, **p < 0.01