| Literature DB >> 34210073 |
Olufisayo Adeyemi Adesina1,2, Olusola Anuoluwapo Akanbi3, Oluyinka Oladele Opaleye4, Margaret Oluwatoyin Japhet1, Bo Wang3, Adekemi Olubukunola Oluyege2, Patrycja Klink3, C-Thomas Bock3,5.
Abstract
As the global effort to eradicate hepatitis B continues, immune escape mutations (IEMs) and drug resistance mutations (DRMs) affecting its diagnosis, treatment, and prevention are compromising this goal. However, knowledge about the prevalence and circulation of these mutations in Nigeria is scarce. Serum samples (n = 199) from apparently healthy prospective blood donors, pregnant women, and individuals presenting with fever in southwestern Nigeria were analyzed for the presence of IEMs and DRMs by means of nested PCR in the HBV S (HBs) and HBV polymerase (Pol) genes, followed by phylogenetic and mutational analyses. In total, 25.1% (n = 50/199) of samples were positive for HBV, as measured by PCR. In 41 samples (20.6%), both fragments could be amplified, whereas the HBs gene and the Pol gene fragment alone were detected in 0.5% (n = 1/199) and 4% (n = 8/199) of samples, respectively. Sequences were successfully obtained for all 42 HBs gene fragments but for only 31/49 Pol gene fragments (totaling 73 sequences from 44 individuals). All sequences were identified as HBV genotype E. IEMs were present in 18.2% (n = 8/44) of the sequences of HBV-positive individuals with available sequences. IEM Q129H was detected in eight out of the 44 (18.2%) HBV isolates sequenced in this study; however, no DRMs were observed. This study confirms the circulation of HBV IEMs and reports the presence of Q129H IEM for the first time in Nigeria. Intensified research on the dynamics of IEM is necessary in order to enhance the elimination of HBV.Entities:
Keywords: Nigeria; PCR; hepatitis; mutation; phylogeny; resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34210073 PMCID: PMC8310067 DOI: 10.3390/v13071273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Overview of the characteristics of the cohort.
| States of Sample Collection N (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekiti | Lagos | Ondo | Osun | Oyo | Total | |
|
| 20(10.1) | 34(17.1) | 28(14.1) | 86(43.2) | 31(15.6) | 199 |
|
| ||||||
| Female | 12(6.0) | 33(16.6) | 28(14.1) | 57(28.6) | 25(12.6) | 155(77.9) |
| Male | 8(4.0) | 1(0.5) | 0(0) | 29(14.6) | 6(3.0) | 44(22.1) |
|
| ||||||
| Pregnant | 5(2.5) | 32(16.1) | 27(13.6) | 22(11.1) | 11(5.5) | 97(48.7) |
| Apparently healthy | 14(7.0) | 2(1.0) | 0(0) | 43(21.6) | 13(6.5) | 72(36.2) |
| Sick | 1(0.5) | 0(0) | 1(0.5) | 21(10.6) | 7(3.5) | 30(15.1) |
|
| ||||||
| 11–20 | 0(0) | 2(1) | 1(0.5) | 4(2.0) | 6(3.0) | 13(6.5) |
| 21–30 | 13(6.5) | 14(7.0) | 15(7.5) | 25(12.6) | 10(5.0) | 77(38.7) |
| 31–40 | 5(2.5) | 17(8.5) | 12(6.0) | 32(16.1) | 8(4.0) | 74(37.2) |
| 41–50 | 2(1) | 1(0.5) | 0(0) | 16(8.0) | 4(2.9) | 23(11.6) |
| 51–60 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 4(2.0) | 1(0.5) | 5(2.5) |
| >60 | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(2.5) | 2(1) | 7(3.5) |
Distribution of HBV-PCR-positive samples among the cohort in the States.
| States of Sample Collection N(%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekiti | Lagos | Ondo | Osun | Oyo | Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HBs and Pol positive | 3(3.1) | 13(13.4) | 0(0) | 3(3.1) | 1(1) | 20(20.6) |
| Pol only positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(5.2) | 2(2.1) | 0(0) | 7(7.2) |
| HBs only positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(3.1) | 1(49.5) |
| Total HBV positive | 3(3.1) | 13(13.4) | 5(5.2) | 5(5.2) | 2(2.1) | 28(28.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HBs and Pol positive | 7(9.7) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(6.9) | 3(4.2) | 15(20.8) |
| Pol only positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| HBs only positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Total HBV positive | 7(9.7) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(6.9) | 3(4.2) | 15(20.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| HBs and Pol positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 3(10) | 3(10) | 6(20) |
| Pol only positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(3.3) | 0(0) | 1(3.3) |
| HBs only positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Total HBV positive | 0(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 4(13.3) | 3(10) | 7(23.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total HBV positive | 10(5) | 13(6.5) | 5(2.5) | 14(7) | 8(4) | 50(25.1) |
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis constructed from a 272-bp-long fragment of the HBs gene of HBV using the maximum likelihood method based on the TVM+I+G4 model. All 42 sequences clustered within genotype E. The HBV sequences from this study are indicated in bold characters. The best BLASTn matches are presented in italics. HBV reference genomes of genotypes A–D and F–J are collapsed with the size of the gray circles being proportional to the number of reference sequences. Bootstrap values >75% are indicated.
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the TIMe-+I+G4 model reconstructed from a 1014-bp-long fragment of the partial HBV Pol gene region. All 31 sequences obtained from this study were assessed as genotype E. The HBV sequences from this study are indicated in bold, whereas the best BLASTn matches are indicated in italics. HBV reference genomes of genotypes A–D and F–J are collapsed, with the size of the gray circles being proportional to the number of reference sequences. Bootstrap values >75% are indicated.
Figure 3Partial HBs and Pol gene sequences obtained from this study aligned with the HBV genotype E reference sequence (Accession number X75657), showing the escape mutation at amino acid 129 of the S gene (sQ129H).
Characteristics of subjects with immune escape mutations.
| Sample Code | State | Sex | Category | HBV | Blood Transfusion History |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BD-021 | Ekiti | Male | Apparently | vaccinated | No |
| BD-026B | Ekiti | Female | Apparently | unvaccinated | No |
| BD-040 | Ekiti | Female | Apparently | unvaccinated | No |
| BD-042 | Ekiti | Female | Pregnant | vaccinated | No |
| BD-043 | Ekiti | Female | Apparently | unvaccinated | No |
| BD-048 | Ekiti | Male | Apparently | unvaccinated | No |
| BD-056B | Ekiti | Female | Apparently | unvaccinated | No |
| PH/-069 | Ondo | Female | Pregnant | unvaccinated | No |