| Literature DB >> 34208177 |
Francesco Spennati1, Salvatore La China2, Giovanna Siracusa3, Simona Di Gregorio3, Alessandra Bardi4, Valeria Tigini5, Gualtiero Mori1, David Gabriel6, Giulio Munz4.
Abstract
This study demonstrated thEntities:
Keywords: biofilm; bioremediation; community structure; fungi; wastewater treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34208177 PMCID: PMC8296185 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Schematic layout of the pilot-scale reactor. Temperature probe (T), dissolved oxygen probe (DO), redox probe (RX), polyurethane foam carriers (PUF), engine for rotation (M).
Figure 2Inlet and outlet COD concentrations and COD removal percentages during continuous treatment in the pilot reactor. Different phases of the experiment are divided by vertical line.
Figure 3Inlet and outlet DOC and DOC removal percentages during continuous treatment in the pilot reactor. Different phases of the experiment are divided by vertical line.
Figure 4Relative abundance of different bacteria (A) and fungi (B) orders in the bioreactor. Out of all reads performed, in Figure 4 are shown those OTUs with more than 1% relative abundance and found in at least two thirds of replicates. Orders representing less than 1% of the total reads are grouped in ‘NA’. “Inocculum” t = 0; “start-up”: at the end of start-up phase t = 55 days; the “middle” t = 79 days; the “Pufp”: small PUFs, “Pufm”: medium PUFs and “Pufg”: big PUFs in the end of the treatment t = 121 days.
Figure 5Comparison of microbial communities in samples at different phases of the process. (A) Venn diagram reporting the shared OTUs among phases. (B) Core microbiome heatmap at the families level. (C) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) for inoculum, start up, middle and end phases.
Figure 6Log2 fold change among the first part (until the middle phase) and the end of the process in average normalized OTU counts grouped at the genus level.