| Literature DB >> 29101689 |
Piotr Świątczak1, Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska2.
Abstract
By modification of the operational conditions of batch reactors, a municipal wastewater treatment plant was upgraded from activated sludge to aerobic granular sludge (AGS) technology. After upgrading, the volume of the biological reactors was reduced by 30%, but the quality of the effluent substantially improved. The concentration of biomass in the reactors increased twofold; the average biomass yield was 0.6 g MLVSS/g COD, and excess granular sludge was efficiently stabilized in aerobic conditions. Canonical correspondence analysis based on the results of next-generation sequencing showed that the time of adaptation significantly influenced the microbial composition of the granules. In mature granules, the abundance of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria was very low, while the abundance of the nitrite-oxidizing bacteria Nitrospira sp. was 0.5 ± 0.1%. The core genera were Tetrasphaera, Sphingopyxis, Dechloromonas, Flavobacterium, and Ohtaekwangia. Bacteria belonging to these genera produce extracellular polymeric substances, which stabilize granule structure and accumulate phosphorus. The results of this study will be useful for designers of AGS wastewater treatment plants, and molecular data given here provide insight into the ecology of mature aerobic granules from a full-scale facility.Entities:
Keywords: Granular sludge; Metagenome; Next-generation sequencing (NGS); Sludge management; WWTP
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29101689 PMCID: PMC5766719 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0615-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Quality of influent and effluent and efficiencies of pollutant removal in the full-scale WWTP during the experimental period
| Parameter | Influent (mg/L) | Before upgrading | After upgrading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effluent (mg/L) | |||
| COD | 1319.5 ± 235.0 | 119.5 ± 16.0 | 39.1 ± 8.2* |
| BOD5 | 1120 ± 260 | 21.0 ± 3.0 | 20.0 ± 2.1 |
| TP | 19.5 ± 2.1 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 0.9 ± 0.3* |
| TN | 90.5 ± 6.6 | 19.2 ± 1.9 | 11.8 ± 0.7* |
| N-NH4 + | 64.3 ± 4.7 | 10.2 ± 4.7 | 0.4 ± 0.5* |
| N-NO3 − | – | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 1.6 ± 0.6* |
| N-NO2 − | – | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| Efficiency of COD removal | – | 75.1 ± 3.8 | 92.3 ± 2.2* |
| Efficiency of TP removal | – | 87.0 ± 1.9 | 95.1 ± 1.9* |
| Efficiency of nitrification | – | 45.0 ± 4.7 | 53.2 ± 6.1* |
| Efficiency of denitrification | – | 63.9 ± 5.1 | 81.7 ± 5.0* |
| Efficiency of TN removal | – | 77.9 ± 1.7 | 87.2 ± 1.4* |
| Reactor | |||
| Biomass concentration | – | 5222 ± 1260 | 9128 ± 1988 |
aSignificant difference, p < 0.05
Fig. 1Percentage of granules with different diameters (mean of two measurements and standard deviation)
Fig. 2Percent of biomass removed depending on the time of stabilization
Fig. 3The quality of the effluent in the successive months of the experiment (upgrading started in October 2015)
Fig. 4Kinetics of removal of COD (a), TP (b), ammonium nitrogen (c), and nitrate nitrogen (d); the changes in ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate nitrogen concentrations followed zero-order kinetics, while COD and TP changes followed pseudo-first and second-order kinetics, respectively
Percentage in samples of the most important classes, families, genera, and species
| Class (phylum)a | Family (order)a | Genusa | Speciesa | Inoc. | 4b | 6b | 7b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actinobacteria (Actinobacteria) | 32.7 | 31.2 ± 4.1 | 32.1 ± 2.6 | 14.3 ± 3.7 | |||
| Intrasporangiaceae (Actinomycetales) | 12.8 | 6.7 ± 6.7 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 2.9 | |||
|
| 12.8 | 6.7 ± 3.8 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 2.9 | |||
|
| 2.9 | 0.7 ± 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.0 | |||
| Streptomycetaceae (Actinomycetales) | 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Acidothermaceae (Acidothermales) | 1.2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 1.2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 1.2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.0 | |||
| Mycobacteriaceae (Corynebacteriales) | 0.3 | 0.2 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |||
| Acidimicrobiia (Actinobacteria) | 0.7 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | |||
| Gammaproteobacteria (Proteobacteria) | 9.5 | 15.6 ± 1.2 | 14.7 ± 0.8 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | |||
| Xanthomonadaceae (Xanthomonadales) | 0.6 | 3.4 ± 3.5 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | |||
| Rhodanobacteraceae (Xanthomonadales) | 1.5 | 3.0 ± 4.3 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | |||
|
| 0.8 | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.5 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | |||
| Competibacteraceae | 3.5 | 5.8 ± 2.6 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | |||
|
| 3.5 | 5.8 ± 2.6 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | |||
| Aeromonadaceae (Aeromonadales) | 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | |||
| Moraxellaceae (Pseudomonadales) | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | |||
| Alphaproteobacteria (Proteobacteria) | 8.3 | 10.6 ± 1.7 | 13.4 ± 1.1 | 13.4 ± 0.5 | |||
| Hyphomicrobiaceae (Rhizobiales) | 0.9 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | |||
|
| 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | |||
| Phyllobacteriaceae (Rhizobiales) | 0.7 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |||
|
| 0.7 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |||
| Methylocystaceae (Rhizobiales) | 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |||
| Rhizobiaceae (Rhizobiales) | 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | |||
| Sphingomonadaceae (Sphingomonadales) | 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 4.8 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 4.6 ± 0.4 | |||
| Rhodobacteraceae (Rhodobacterales) | 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | |||
| Rhodospirillaceae (Rhodospirillales) | 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | |||
| Caulobacteraceae (Caulobacterales) | 0.5 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | |||
| Betaproteobacteria (Proteobacteria) | 3.9 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.4 | 12.2 ± 1.7 | |||
| Rhodocyclaceae (Rhodocyclales) | 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 1.8 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 4.2 ± 1.7 | |||
|
| 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | |||
| Comamonadaceae (Burkholderiales) | 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | |||
| Burkholderiaceae (Burkholderiales) | 0.6 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.6 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.0 | |||
| Deltaproteobacteria (Proteobacteria) | 2.9 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 9.5 ± 1.8 | |||
| Polyangiaceae (Myxococcales) | 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | |||
| Kofleriaceae (Myxococcales) | 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | |||
| Bdellovibrionaceae (Bdellovibrionales) | 0.3 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | |||
| Sphingobacteriia (Bacteroidetes) | 7.4 | 4.8 ± 2.0 | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 9.5 ± 2.1 | |||
| Saprospiraceae (Sphingobacteriales) | 1.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | |||
|
| 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | |||
| Flavobacteria (Bacteroidetes) | 1.3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | |||
| Flavobacteriaceae (Flavobacteriales) | 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | |||
|
| 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.6 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.8 ± 0.7 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | |||
| Cytophagia (Bacteroidetes) | 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | |||
| Cytophagaceae (Cytophagales) | 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | |||
|
| 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.7 | |||
| Acidobacteriia (Acidobacteria) | 1.8 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | |||
| Acidobacteriaceae (Acidobacteriales) | 1.3 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | |||
|
| 1.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | |||
| Nitrospira (Nitrospirae) | 1.7 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |||
| Nitrospiraceae (Nitrospirales) | 1.6 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |||
|
| 1.6 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | |||
| Thermomicrobia (Chloroflexi) | 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |||
| Sphaerobacteraceae (Sphaerobacterales) | 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |||
| Caldilineae (Chloroflexi) | 1.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | |||
| Caldilineaceae (Caldilineales) | 1.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |||
|
| 1.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |||
| Anaerolineae (Chloroflexi) | 0.8 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | |||
| Chloroflexia (Chloroflexi) | 0.4 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | |||
| Clostridia (Firmicutes) | 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | |||
| Clostridiaceae (Clostridiales) | 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | |||
| Bacilli (Firmicutes) | 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | |||
| Ignavibacteria (Ignavibacteriae) | 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | |||
| Ignavibacteriaceae (Ignavibacteriales) | 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | |||
| Planctomycetia (Planctomycetes) | 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | |||
| Verrucomicrobiae (Verrucomicrobia) | 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.0 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
Inoc inoculum
aNo data is presented for taxa whose abundance in any sample did not cross a threshold of 0.5%
bMonth of sampling, the average from R1 and R2
Fig. 5Granular sludge: tardigrade (a), tardigrade eggs (b), rotifer (c), Voricella sp. (d), Aspidisca sp. (e), and morphology (f)
Fig. 6CCA showing the association between bacterial a phyla and operational variables; the continuous operational variables (temperature (T), the number of cycles from the start of granulation (C)) are represented by arrows; the discontinuous operational variable (reactor (R) is represented by a triangle. Actin Actinobacteria, Proteo Proteobacteria, Bacter Bacteroidetes, Chlorofl Chloroflexi, Acido Acidobacteria, Firmicut Firmicutes, Nitrospi Nitrospirae, Planctom Planctomycetes, Ignav Ignavibacteriae, Verruc Verrucomicrobia, Gemm Gemmatimonadetes, Spriroch Spirochaetes, Fibro Fibrobacteres, Chloro Chlorobi, Cyano Cyanobacteria. b Classes and operational variables. Acidi Acidimicrobiia, Acido Acidobacteriia, Actin Actinobacteria, Alpha Alphaproteobacteria, Anae Anaerolineae, Bacilli, Bacte Bacteroidia, Beta Betaproteobacteria, Blasto Blastocatellia, Caldi Caldilineae, Chloro Chlorobia, Chlorofl Chloroflexia, Clost Clostridia, Cyto Cytophagia, Dehalo Dehalococcoidia, Delta Deltaproteobacteria, Fibro Fibrobacteria, Flavo Flavobacteriia, Gamm Gammaproteobacteria, Ignav Ignavibacteria, Negati Negativicutes, Nitro Nitrospira, Planc Planctomycetia, Rubro Rubrobacteria, Soli Solibacteres, Sphing Sphingobacteriia, Spiro Spirochaetia, Thermole Thermoleophilia, Therm Thermomicrobia, Verru Verrucomicrobiae