| Literature DB >> 34203527 |
Paola Terrazas1,2, Efrain Salamanca3, Marcelo Dávila2, Sophie Manner1, Alberto Gimenez3, Olov Sterner1.
Abstract
The natural products pulchrol and pulchral, isolated from the roots of the Mexican plant Bourreria pulchra, have previously been shown to possess antiparasitic activity towards Trypanosoma cruzi, Leishmania braziliensis and L. amazonensis, which are protozoa responsible for Chagas disease and leishmaniasis. These infections have been classified as neglected diseases, and still require the development of safer and more efficient alternatives to their current treatments. Recent SARs studies, based on the pulchrol scaffold, showed which effects exchanges of its substituents have on the antileishmanial and antitrypanosomal activity. Many of the analogues prepared were shown to be more potent than pulchrol and the current drugs used to treat leishmaniasis and Chagas disease (miltefosine and benznidazole, respectively), in vitro. Moreover, indications of some of the possible interactions that may take place in the binding sites were also identified. In this study, 12 analogues with modifications at two or three different positions in two of the three rings were prepared by synthetic and semi-synthetic procedures. The molecules were assayed in vitro towards T. cruzi epimastigotes, L. braziliensis promastigotes, and L. amazonensis promastigotes. Some compounds had higher antiparasitic activity than the parental compound pulchrol, and in some cases even benznidazole and miltefosine. The best combinations in this subset are with carbonyl functionalities in the A-ring and isopropyl groups in the C-ring, as well as with alkyl substituents in both the A- and C-rings combined with a hydroxyl group in position 1 (C-ring). The latter corresponds to cannabinol, which indeed was shown to be potent towards all the parasites.Entities:
Keywords: Leishmania amazonensis; Leishmania braziliensis; SARs; Trypanosoma cruzi; cannabinol; pulchral; pulchrol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34203527 PMCID: PMC8271509 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The 6H-benzo[c]chromene scaffold studied here (left), and structures of pulchrol (1a), cannabinol (5f) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (6).
Figure 2Prepared derivatives. 1a R2 = OMe, R3 = H, R6′ = Me, R6″ = Me; 1b R2 = isopropyl, R3 = H, R6′ = Me, R6″ = Me; 1c R2 = H, R3 = isopropyl, R6′ = Me, R6″ = Me; 1d R2 = OMe, R3 = H, R6′ = Me, R6″ = H; 1e R2 = OMe, R3 = H, R6′ = H, R6″ = Me; 2a R2 = OMe, R3 = H, R6′ = Me, R6″ = Me; 2b R2 = isopropyl, R3 = H, R6′ = Me, R6″ = Me; 2c R2 = H, R3 = isopropyl, R6′ = Me, R6″ = Me; 2d R2 = OMe, R3 = H, R6′ = Me, R6″ = H; 2e R2 = OMe, R3 = H, R6′ = H, R6″ = Me; 3a R2 = OMe; 3b R2 = isopropyl; 4a R2 = OMe, R3 = H; 4b R2 = isopropyl, R3 = H; 4c R2 = H, R3 = isopropyl; 5a R1 = H, R2 = OMe, R3 = H; 5b R1 = H, R2 = isopropyl, R3 = H; 5c R1 = H, R2 = H, R3 = isopropyl; 5d R1 = H, R2 = OH, R3 = H; 5e R1 = OH, R2 = H, R3 = Me; 5f R1 = OH, R2 = H, R3 = n-pentyl. See Experimental part for synthetic details.
Antileishmanial and antitrypanosomal activity pulchrol derivatives, compared to the positive controls benznidazole and miltefosine. See experimental for details about the assays.
| Mol. | R1 | R2 | R3 | R6′ | R6′ |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (μM) | IC50 (μM) | IC50 (μM) | ||||||
|
| H | OMe | Me | Me | Me | 18.5 ± 9.6 | 59.2 ± 11.8 | 77.7 ± 5.6 |
|
| H | H | Me | Me | 10.7 ± 4.3 | 12.1 ± 4.6 | 11.4 ± 3.6 | |
|
| H | H | Me | Me | 7.1 ± 1.4 | 17.8 ± 1.8 | 17.8 ± 0.7 | |
|
| H | OMe | H | Me | H | 125.8 ± 7.9 | 70.8 ± 19.7 | 44.0 ± 1.6 |
|
| H | OMe | H | H | Me | 170.3 ± 7.9 | 118.0 ± 0.8 | 80.6 ± 4.7 |
|
| H | H | Me | Me | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 8.8 ± 1.0 | 9.5 ± 4.1 | |
|
| H | H | Me | Me | 10.9 ± 3.8 | 272.9 ± 0.00 | 25.9 ± 5.5 | |
|
| H | H | Me | Me | 13.6 ± 5.7 | 63.3 ± 4.4 | 43.7 ± 8.2 | |
|
| H | H | Me | Me | 23.7 ± 8.6 | 49.2 ± 15.0 | 49.6 ± 4.5 | |
|
| H | H | Me | Me | 50.3 ± 11.3 | 311.6 ± 50.3 | 236.5 ± 48.8 | |
|
| H | OH | H | Me | Me | 54.9 ± 0.2 | 30.4 ± 2.9 | 33.3 ± 5.4 |
|
| OH | H | Me | Me | Me | 5.9 ± 2.0 | 15.7 ± 5.1 | 21.2 ± 2.4 |
|
| OH | H | Me | Me | 7.4 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | 14.2 ± 1.3 | |
| Benznidazole | 19.2 ± 7.7 | |||||||
| Miltefosine | 13.0 ± 1.2 | 10.8 ± 1.5 | ||||||
Proton chemical shifts (in ppm) for the compounds prepared in this study, measured at 400 MHz. The assignments were made with 2D NMR spectroscopy, COSY, HMQC and HMBC experiments.
| Compd. | 1-H | 2-H | 3-H | 4-H | 7-H | 8-H | 10-H | 1′-H/H2/H3 | 2-OCH3 | 6-H/H2 | 6,6-CH3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7.26 | - | 6.81 | 6.89 | 7.23 | 7.30 | 7.68 | 4.74 | 3.85 | - | 1.61 |
| 7.65 | - | 7.15 | 6.90 | 7.41 | 7.79 | 8.24 | 10.07 | - | - | 1.65 | |
| 7.73 | 6.94 | - | 6.85 | 7.40 | 7.77 | 8.19 | 10.05 | - | - | 1.66 | |
|
| 7.31 | - | 6.87 | 6.94 | 7.34 | 7.81 | 8.17 | 10.07 | 3.87 | 5.25 | 1.63 |
|
| 7.32 | - | 6.87 | 6.94 | 7.34 | 7.81 | 8.17 | 10.07 | 3.87 | 5.27 | 1.63 |
| 7.65 | - | 7.13 | 6.89 | 7.32 | 7.85 | 8.32 | - | - | - | 1.64 | |
| 7.57 | - | 7.11 | 6.88 | 7.23 | 7.28 | 7.71 | 5.17 | - | - | 1.62 | |
| 7.64 | 6.90 | - | 6.82 | 7.22 | 7.24 | 7.66 | 5.14 | - | - | 1.63 | |
| 7.59 | - | 7.10 | 6.89 | 7.15 | 7.12 | 7.58 | 2.43 | - | - | 1.63 | |
| 7.63 | 6.88 | - | 6.82 | 7.12 | 7.08 | 7.51 | 2.39 | - | - | 1.62 | |
|
| 7.20 | - | 6.70 | 6.83 | 7.12 | 7.12 | 7.45 | 2.39 | - | - | 1.60 |
| - | 6.28 | - | 6.43 | 7.15 | 7.07 | 8.17 | 2.39 | - | - | 1.60 | |
| - | 6.29 | - | 6.43 | 7.14 | 7.07 | 8.16 | 2.38 | - | - | 1.59 |
a Isopropyl signals at 2.95 and 1.30 ppm. b Isopropyl signals at 2.90 and 1.27 ppm. c Methyl signal at 2.66 ppm and isopropyl signals at 2.95 and 1.30 ppm. d i-Butyl signals at 2.28, 2.16 and 0.99 ppm; and isopropyl signals at 2.94 and 1.30 ppm. e i-Butyl signals at 2.26, 2.15 and 0.97 ppm; and isopropyl signals at 2.88 and 1.26 ppm. f Isopropyl signals at 2.95 and 1.31 ppm. g Isopropyl signals at 2.88 and 1.26 ppm. h Methyl signal at 2.26 ppm. i n-Pentyl signals at 2.50, 1.61, 1.33, 1.31, 0.88 ppm.
13C NMR chemical shifts (in ppm) for compounds of series 1 to 5 determined at 100 MHz in CDCl3. The assignments were made with 2D NMR spectroscopy, COSY, HMQC and HMBC experiments.
| Compd. | C-1 | C-2 | C-3 | C-4 | C-4a | C-6 | C-6a | C-7 | C-8 | C-9 | C-10 | C-10a | C-10b | C-1′ | 2-OCH3 | 6,6-CH3/6-CH3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 108.0 | 154.6 | 115.5 | 118.8 | 146.9 | 77.4 | 139.5 | 123.7 | 126.8 | 140.4 | 121.0 | 129.1 | 123.0 | 65.3 | 56.0 | 27.5 |
| 121.1 | 142.5 | 128.6 | 118.1 | 150.9 | 77.4 | 146.0 | 124.2 | 129.5 | 135.9 | 123.2 | 130.3 | 121.0 | 192.2 | - | 27.5 | |
| 123.1 | 120.5 | 152.2 | 115.9 | 152.8 | 77.7 | 145.4 | 124.2 | 129.0 | 136.0 | 123.2 | 130.2 | 118.9 | 192.1 | - | 27.6 | |
|
| 108.0 | 155.0 | 116.7 | 118.8 | 147.5 | 73.6 | 142.5 | 125.1 | 129.8 | 136.4 | 123.1 | 130.8 | 122.1 | 192.1 | 56.0 | 19.9 |
|
| 108.0 | 155.1 | 116.7 | 118.9 | 147.5 | 73.6 | 142.6 | 125.1 | 129.8 | 136.4 | 123.1 | 130.8 | 122.1 | 192.1 | 56.0 | 19.9 |
| 121.1 | 142.4 | 128.2 | 118.0 | 150.9 | 77.4 | 144.6 | 123.7 | 128.0 | 136.6 | 122.0 | 129.7 | 121.3 | 198.0 | - | 27.5 | |
| 120.8 | 142.0 | 127.8 | 117.9 | 150.9 | 77.4 | 139.7 | 123.7 | 127.7 | 135.6 | 122.1 | 129.4 | 121.7 | 66.0 | - | 27.7 | |
| 122.8 | 120.1 | 151.4 | 115.8 | 152.9 | 77.6 | 139.2 | 123.6 | 127.4 | 135.6 | 121.9 | 129.3 | 119.7 | 66.0 | - | 27.8 | |
| 120.7 | 141.9 | 127.4 | 117.8 | 151.0 | 77.4 | 137.1 | 123.3 | 128.6 | 137.2 | 122.8 | 127.7 | 122.1 | 21.5 | - | 27.8 | |
| 122.7 | 119.9 | 150.9 | 115.8 | 152.9 | 77.6 | 136.5 | 123.2 | 128.3 | 137.2 | 122.6 | 128.7 | 120.1 | 64.8 | - | 27.9 | |
|
| 109.5 | 150.1 | 116.3 | 118.9 | 146.9 | 77.4 | 137.4 | 123.3 | 129.1 | 137.3 | 123.1 | 128.4 | 123.5 | 21.4 | - | 27.6 |
| 153.2 | 110.7 | 139.5 | 111.6 | 154.8 | 77.4 | 137.0 | 122.8 | 127.7 | 137.0 | 126.6 | 127.6 | 108.7 | 21.7 | - | 27.2 | |
| 153.2 | 110.0 | 144.7 | 110.9 | 154.8 | 77.4 | 137.0 | 122.8 | 127.7 | 127.7 | 126.5 | 137.0 | 108.8 | 21.7 | - | 27.2 |
a Isopropyl signals at 33.9 and 24.4 ppm. b Isopropyl signals at 34.2 and 23.9 ppm. c Methyl signal at 26.9 ppm and isopropyl signals at 33.9 and 24.4 ppm. d 3-Methylbutanoate signals at 173.1, 43.6, 25.9 and 22.6 ppm and isopropyl signals at 33.8 and 24.4 ppm. e 3-Methylbutanoate signals at 173.1, 43.6, 25.9 and 22.6 ppm and isopropyl signals at 34.1 and 23.9 ppm. f Isopropyl signals at 33.9 and 24.4 ppm. g Isopropyl signals at 34.1 and 24.0 ppm. h Methyl signal at 21.4 ppm. i n-Pentyl signals at 35.8, 31.6, 30.6, 22.7 and 14.2 ppm.