| Literature DB >> 34203034 |
Winnie Wing Man Ng1, Anthony Siu Wo Wong2, Kin Cheung3.
Abstract
This cluster randomized controlled trial (CRCT)-designed study aimed to explore the feasibility of a promotion pamphlet and/or WhatsApp as a suitable mode of delivery to promote healthy eating habits with fruit and vegetables (F&V) among firefighters. Convenience and snowball sampling methods were used. Forty-five firefighters from 23 fire stations were recruited and they all received the printed pamphlet, while the intervention group participants (n = 20) received additional teaching material through WhatsApp every two weeks for eight weeks. Feasibility outcomes included retention, practicality, and implementation. The participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention. There were significant improvements in the mean numbers of days consuming F&V (p = 0.002; p = 0.031) in the intervention group, and for fruit consumption (p = 0.033) in the control group between the baseline (T0) and 3 months after completion of intervention (T1). High levels of participants' satisfaction with the intervention revealed that a full-scale CRCT of the WhatsApp-delivered intervention promoting healthy eating could be feasible, especially as a means of increasing the numbers of days they consumed F&V and the numbers of servings of these consumed per day.Entities:
Keywords: cluster randomized control trial; feasibility study; firefighters; fruit and vegetables consumption; health promotion; healthy eating habits
Year: 2021 PMID: 34203034 PMCID: PMC8296461 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126633
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1CONSORT diagram.
Baseline demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 45).
| Characteristics | Total | Intervention | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Years) | 35.0 ± 9.6 | 32.9 ± 9.5 | 36.6 ± 9.6 |
| Years of work experience (Years) | 11.3 ± 9.9 | 9.4 ± 9.6 | 12.8 ± 10.1 |
|
| |||
| Single | 47 | 55 | 40 |
| Married | 51 | 40 | 60 |
| Divorced | 2 | 5 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Front-line | 93 | 95 | 92 |
| Management work | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Others | 2 | 5 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Fireman | 62 | 70 | 56 |
| Senior fireman | 16 | 5 | 24 |
| Principal fireman | 11 | 10 | 12 |
| Probationary station officer | 9 | 15 | 4 |
| Senior station officer | 2 | 0 | 4 |
Figure 2Within-group comparison of number of day(s) of two groups’ F&V consumption between T0 and T1 by Wilcoxon sign-ranked test.
Between-group comparison of the numbers of servings of F&V intake per day between groups at each time point (Mann–Whitney U test).
| Time | Serving | Total | Intervention | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | <2 servings of fruits and <3 servings of vegetables 1 | 37 (82) | 17 (85) | 37 (82) | 0.304 |
| ≥2 servings of fruits or ≥3 servings of vegetables | 8 (18) | 3 (15) | 8 (18) | ||
| T1 | <2 servings of fruits and <3 servings of vegetables | 28 (62) | 12 (60) | 28 (62) | 0.789 |
| ≥2 servings of fruits or ≥3 servings of vegetables | 17 (38) | 8 (40) | 17 (38) |
1 <2 servings of fruits and <3 servings of vegetables: less than recommended for both F&V.