| Literature DB >> 31979157 |
Seiyeong Park1, Junhye Kwon1, Kyoungmin Noh1, Chung Gun Lee1,2, Wook Song1,2,3, Jung-Jun Park4, Han-Joon Lee5, Dong-Il Seo6, Hyun Joo Kang7, Yeon Soon Ahn8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to the National Fire Agency, 69% of South Korean firefighters prefer the three circuit system. Since the three circuit system involves working for 24 h consecutively, it could reduce work performance of firefighters and their participation in exercise training (ET) and fitness levels could be affected by shift type. The present study examined the impact of shift type on ET and identified the interaction effect between shift type and city size on ET among South Korean firefighters.Entities:
Keywords: exercise training; firefighter; shift work
Year: 2020 PMID: 31979157 PMCID: PMC7037628 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17030728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of firefighters.
| Characteristics | Category | N | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants | Total | 5196 | |
| Sex | Male | 4803 | 92.44 |
| Female | 393 | 7.56 | |
| Age (Mean ± SD) | 38.14 ± 8.68 | ||
| Job position 1 | Low | 2594 | 56.85 |
| Middle | 2207 | 42.48 | |
| High | 35 | 0.67 | |
| Education | High school | 997 | 19.20 |
| College | 1733 | 33.37 | |
| University | 2277 | 43.85 | |
| Graduate school | 72 | 1.39 | |
| Drinking | Yes | 3823 | 73.62 |
| No | 1370 | 26.38 | |
| Smoking | Yes | 1462 | 28.15 |
| No | 3731 | 71.85 | |
| Shift-type | 3 circuit | 517 | 9.95 |
| 21 circuit | 4679 | 90.05 | |
| City size | Large city | 2038 | 42.49 |
| Small town | 2758 | 57.51 | |
| Exercise training | ≥150 | 2324 | 46.37 |
| (min/week) | <150 | 2688 | 53.63 |
1 Low job position includes firefighter, senior fireman; Middle job position includes fire sergeant, fire lieutenant, fire captain; High job position includes assistant fire chief, fire chief, above fire sub-deputy chief.
Logistic regression models examining the relationships between variables and exercise training (N = 4653).
| Characteristics | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef | SE | Coef | SE | Coef | SE | Coef | SE | Coef | SE | |
| Intercept | −0.698 *** | 0.145 | −0.746 *** | 0.152 | −0.727 *** | 0.152 | −0.697 *** | 0.162 | −0.716 *** | 0.162 |
| Sex | ||||||||||
| Men (ref) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Women | 0.811 *** | 0.123 | 0.904 *** | 0.125 | 0.902 *** | 0.125 | 0.897 *** | 0.131 | 0.900 *** | 0.131 |
| Age | −0.012 * | 0.005 | −0.012 * | 0.005 | −0.012 * | 0.005 | −0.012 * | 0.006 | −0.011 * | 0.006 |
| Education | ||||||||||
| High school (ref) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| College | −0.342 *** | 0.084 | −0.347 *** | 0.084 | −0.348 *** | 0.084 | −0.350 *** | 0.087 | −0.354 *** | 0.087 |
| University | −0.342 *** | 0.079 | −0.351 *** | 0.080 | −0.353 *** | 0.080 | −0.343 *** | 0.082 | −0.346 *** | 0.082 |
| Graduate school | −0.375 | 0.259 | −0.398 | 0.260 | −0.414 | 0.261 | −0.382 | 0.277 | −0.390 | 0.277 |
| Job position | ||||||||||
| Low (ref) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Middle | 0.146 | 0.093 | 0.128 | 0.094 | 0.127 | 0.094 | 0.105 | 0.098 | 0.109 | 0.098 |
| High | 0.293 | 0.351 | 0.265 | 0.352 | 0.263 | 0.352 | 0.140 | 0.364 | 0.134 | 0.364 |
| Drinking | ||||||||||
| Yes (ref) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| No | 0.101 | 0.067 | 0.101 | 0.067 | 0.080 | 0.070 | 0.081 | 0.070 | ||
| Smoking | ||||||||||
| Yes (ref) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| No | −0.345 *** | 0.066 | −0.344 *** | 0.066 | −0.325 *** | 0.070 | −0.325 *** | 0.070 | ||
| Shift-type | ||||||||||
| 3 circuit (ref) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| 21 circuit | −0.164 | 0.097 | −0.326 * | 0.103 | −0.108 | 0.109 | ||||
| City size | ||||||||||
| Large city (ref) | - | - | - | - | ||||||
| Small town | −0.046 | 0.063 | −0.009 | 0.064 | ||||||
| Interaction | ||||||||||
| Shift-type × City size | −1.146 ** | 0.394 | ||||||||
Note: Model 1 is the sex, age, education, and job-position controlled model. Model 2 is the drinking, smoking and sex/age/education/job-position controlled model; Model 3 is the shift-type, drinking/smoking and sex/age/education/job-position controlled model; Model 4 is the city size, shift-type, drinking/smoking and sex/age/education/job-position controlled model; and Model 5 is the full model where interaction term was entered into Model 4. Coef = logistic coefficient; ref = reference category. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1The interaction effect between shift type and city size on exercise training participation.