| Literature DB >> 34203033 |
Andrei V Tarasov1, Rofail S Rakhmanov2, Elena S Bogomolova2, Ludmila A Perminova1, Zhanna L Malakhova1.
Abstract
The Kaliningrad region is known for its specific climate, which can negatively affect the adaptive potential of the body. This manifests in an increased incidence of respiratory diseases and skin conditions. To prevent high morbidity, a plant protein product was included in the diet of first-year university students. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this food intervention in preventing the most common diseases among Kaliningrad students. Two groups of university students took part in the food trial. In the control group, catabolic processes prevailed in nutrient metabolism. Disadaptation manifested itself in the metabolism of proteins, vitamins, minerals, hematopoiesis and humoral immunity. Inflammation was indicated by α1- and α2-globulins, a weak immune response, and IgM and IgG. High oxidative stress and low antioxidative ability of blood serum were observed. The plant-based protein product (FP) helped preserve testosterone level and prevent an increase in catabolic reactions. Moreover, it had a positive effect on both red blood cell hematopoiesis (a smaller increase in the average volume of erythrocytes, the same average concentration and content of hemoglobin, an increased relative red cell distribution width (RDW) and white blood cell hematopoiesis (a beneficial effect for the immune system: lymphocytes, the relative content of neutrophils, monocytes, basophils and eosinophils). The stimulation of humoral immunity was evidenced by beta- and gamma-globulins, an active immune response, the level of IgM and IgG, antioxidant protection, reduction of peroxides and an increase in antioxidant activity of blood serum. The 34-week observation showed a 1.7-fold decrease in the incidence of respiratory illnesses and a 5.7-fold decrease in skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases. Acute respiratory infections were reduced 1.8-fold. There were no cases of community-acquired pneumonia in the treatment group, compared with 55.1‰ in the control group. The incidence of respiratory diseases was 3.3-10.6 times lower in the treatment group than in the control group in weeks 6-19. The findings testify to the prophylactic effect of functional food during social adaptation and acclimatization of students.Entities:
Keywords: acclimatization; antioxidants; blood test; functional food; immunity; prevention; respiratory diseases; social adaptation; students; vitamins
Year: 2021 PMID: 34203033 PMCID: PMC8234439 DOI: 10.3390/nu13062116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
The vitamin and mineral content in the functional product, mg/100 g.
| Minerals | Vitamins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | Zn | Fe | Мn | Cr | A | E | В2 | K | C |
| 0.58 | 9.86 | 71.00 | 2.85 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 3.69 | 0.30 | 0.51 | 89.91 |
Body mineral concentrations during the observation period (absolute values).
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Minerals | |||
| Copper, μg/mL (0.7–1.55): | |||
| treatment | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.06 (−3.6%) | 0.82 ± 0.03 (−3.6%) |
| control | 0.81 ± 0.09 | 0.73 ± 0.05 (−9.9%) | 0.76 ± 0.04 (−6.2%) |
| Zinc, μg/mL (0.5–1.5): | |||
| treatment | 1.27 ± 0.10 | 1.20 ± 0.07 (−5.5%) | 1.30 ± 0.05 (+2.3%) |
| control | 1.0 ± 0.08 | 0.97 ± 0.08 (−3.0%) | 1.13 ± 0.08 (+13.0%) |
| Iron, mM/L (11.6–31.3): | |||
| treatment | 13.60 ± 0.73 | 15.67 ± 1.0 (+15.2%) | 16.43 ± 1.0 (+20.8%) |
| control | 14.20 ± 1.15 | 16.84 ± 0.86 (+18.5%) | 16.65 ± 0.93 (+17.2%) |
| Magnesium, mM/L (0.66–1.07): | |||
| treatment | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.01 (+6.3%) | 0.85 ± 0.01 (+34.2%) |
| control | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.01 (−22.6%) | 0.86 ± 0.01 (−13.6%) |
| Phosphorus, mM/L (0.87–1.45): | |||
| treatment | 1.12 ± 0.03 | 1.29 ± 0.03 (+16.1%) | 1.35 ± 0.03 (+21.2%) |
| control | 1.26 ± 0.03 | 1.13 ± 0.03 (−10.1%) | 1.30 ± 0.03 (+3.4%) |
| Calcium, mM/L (2,15–2,57): | |||
| treatment | 2.61 ± 0.02 | 2.59 ± 0.01 (−0.8%) | 2.58 ± 0.02 (−1.1%) |
| control | 2.56 ± 0.02 | 2.51 ± 0.02 (−1.9%) | 2.54 ± 0.20 (−0.8%) |
| Potassium, mM/L (3,6–5,5): | |||
| treatment | 5.19 ± 0.12 | 5.04 ± 0.10 (−2.9%) | 5.25 ± 0.11(+1.1%) |
| control | 5.31 ± 0.15 | 5.10 ± 0.08 (−4.0%) | 5.17 ± 0.09 (−2.7%) |
| Sodium, mM/L (135–150): | |||
| treatment | 145.60 ± 2.31 | 149.60 ± 0.35 (+2.7%) | 150.50 ± 0.48 (+3.3%) |
| control | 149.80 ± 0.57 | 147.60 ± 0.36 (−1.5%) | 150.0 ± 0.38 (+0.1%) |
| Chlorine, mM/L (97–108): | |||
| treatment | 100.20 ± 1.11 | 100.30 ± 0.40 (+0.1%) | 104.30 ± 0.40 (+4.1%) |
| control | 102.10 ± 0.47 | 103.40 ± 0.48 (+1.3%) | 102.80 ± 0.41 (−0.9%) |
Vitamin concentrations during the observation (absolute values).
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Vitamins | |||
| A, μg/mL (0.3–0.6): | |||
| treatment | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 1.08 ± 0.04 (+21.3%) | 1.1 ± 0.03 (+23.6%) |
| control | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.91 ± 0.05 (+9.6%) | 0.91 ± 0.04 (+9.6%) |
| E, μg/mL (8–18): | |||
| treatment | 7.86 ± 0.34 | 8.7 ± 0.54 (+10.7%) | 9.19 ± 0.41 (+16.9%) |
| control | 7.75 ± 0.43 | 6.78 ± 0.39 (−12.5%) | 6.78 ± 0.53 (−12.5%) |
| В1, μg/mL (7–14): | |||
| treatment | 21.4 ± 0.9 | 20.6 ± 1.0 (−3.8%) | 20.63 ± 1.0 (−3.6%) |
| control | 19.7 ± 1.3 | 16.36 ± 0.85 (−17.0%) | 17.6 ± 1.0 (−10.7%) |
| B2, μg/% (10–50): | |||
| treatment | 6.1 ± 0.03 | 6.9 ± 0.41 (+13.5%) | 7.83 ± 0.2 (+28.3%) |
| control | 5.91 ± 0.4 | 5.85 ± 0.3 (−0.9%) | 6.08 ± 0.3 (+2.8%) |
Protein metabolism indicators during the observation period (absolute values).
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Protein metabolism | |||
| Total protein, g/L (64–83): | |||
| treatment | 74.15 ± 0.68 | 75.9 ± 1.0 (+2.3%) | 74.6 ± 0.8 (+0.6%) |
| control | 73.2 ± 0.60 | 71.8 ± 0.7 (−1.9%) | 74.8 ± 0.9 (+2.1%) |
| Albumin,% (46.9–61.4): | |||
| treatment | 55.71 ± 0.7 | 54.29 ± 0.64 (−2.6%) | 55.44 ± 0.88 (−0.5%) |
| control | 51.95 ± 1.0 | 56.23 ± 0.8 (+8.2%) | 57.91 ± 0.74 (+11.5%) |
| Alpha−1 globulins,% (2.2–4.2): | |||
| treatment | 4.37 ± 0.17 | 3.83 ± 0.1 (−12,4%) | 3.73 ± 0.14 (−14.6%) |
| control | 4.21 ± 0.13 | 4.05 ± 0.2 (−3,8%) | 4.24 ± 0.71 (+0.7%) |
| Alpha−2 globulins,% (7.9–10.9): | |||
| treatment | 10.2 ± 0.23 | 9.66 ± 0.25 (−5.3%) | 10.02 ± 0.49 (−1.8%) |
| control | 11.68 ± 0.44 | 10.06 ± 0.3 (−13.9%) | 9.91 ± 0.54 (−15.5%) |
| Beta globulins,% (10.2–18.3): | |||
| treatment | 11.4 ± 0.26 | 12.31 ± 0.23 (+8.0%) | 11.61 ± 0.42 (+1.8%) |
| control | 11.79 ± 0.29 | 12.13 ± 0.18 (+2.8%) | 11.3 ± 0.52 (−4.2%) |
| Gamma globulins,% (17.6–25.4): | |||
| treatment | 18.28 ± 0.53 | 19.85 ± 0.58 (+8.6%) | 19.19 ± 0.85 (+4.9%) |
| control | 20.54 ± 0.8 | 16.69 ± 0.73 (−18.7%) | 16.63 ± 0.59 (−19.0%) |
Changes in the hormone content during the observation period (nmol/L).
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Hormones, (nmol/L) | |||
| Testosterone, 8.72–38.17: | |||
| treatment | 24.73 ± 1.98 | 25.53 ± 1.65 (+3.2%) | 21.19 ± 1.77 (−14.3%) |
| control | 26.18 ± 1.17 | 18.43 ± 1.8 (−29.6%) | 17.59 ± 0.9 (−32.8%) |
| Cortisol, 200.0–700.0: | |||
| treatment | 636.8 ± 31.8 | 673.3 ± 29.6 (+5.8%) | 672.0 ± 35.0 (+5.5%) |
| control | 750.6 ± 47.9 | 761.0 ± 38.4 (+1.4%) | 685.6 ± 28.5 (−8.7%) |
Red blood cells during the period of food intervention (absolute values).
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Average erythrocyte volume, 80–95 fl: | |||
| treatment | 87.1 ± 0.49 | 87.5 ± 0.47 (+0.5%) | 88.3 ± 0.54 (+1.3%) |
| control | 85.1 ± 0.9 | 86.0 ± 0.99 (+1.1%) | 86.2 ± 0.9 (+1.3%) |
| Average content of HGB in erythrocyte, 25–35 pg: | |||
| treatment | 30.30 ± 0.17 | 30.35 ± 0.17 (+0.1%) | 30.49 ± 0.17 (+0.6%) |
| control | 30.35 ± 0.39 | 30.0 ± 0.37 (−1.2%) | 30.1 ± 0.23 (−0.8%) |
| Average concentration of HGB in erythrocyte, 30.0–38.0 g/L: | |||
| treatment | 34.79 ± 0.08 | 34.67 ± 0.14 (+0.4%) | 34.61 ± 0.20 (−0.5%) |
| control | 35.6 ± 0.3 | 34.9 ± 0.19 (−2.0%) | 34.6 ± 0.24 (−2.8%) |
| Relative RDW, standard deviation, | |||
| 39–46 fl.: | |||
| treatment | 41.45 ± 0.33 | 42.5 ± 0.43 (+2.5%) | 42.48 ± 0.35 (+2.5%) |
| control | 42.07 ± 0.5 | 42.39 ± 0.68 (+0.6%) | 42.5 ± 0.69 (+1.0%) |
| Relative RDW, coefficient of variation, | |||
| 11.8–15.6%: | |||
| treatment | 13.28 ± 0.10 | 13.54 ± 0.12 (+2.0%) | 13.59 ± 0.10 (2.3%) |
| control | 13.2 ± 0.09 | 13.2 ± 0.10 (0%) | 13.1 ± 0.13 (−0.8%) |
White blood cells during the food intervention (absolute values).
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Leukocytes, 4.2–9 × 109 cells/L: | |||
| treatment | 6.96 ± 0.22 | 7.86 ± 0.30 (+12.0%) | 7.69 ± 0.21 (+10.4%) |
| control | 6.57 ± 0.48 | 6.31 ± 0.34 (−3.9%) | 7.95 ± 0.35 (+24.9%) |
| Lymphocytes, 1.5–4.0 × 109 L: | |||
| treatment | 2.33 ± 0.07 | 2.55 ± 0.09 (+9.4%) | 2.53 ± 0.10 (+8.6%) |
| control | 2.17 ± 0.16 | 2.23 ± 0.18 (+2.7%) | 2.71 ± 0.17(+24.9%) |
| Monocytes, 0.1–0.8 × 109 L: | |||
| treatment | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.04(+14.5%) | 0.84 ± 0.03(+21.7%) |
| control | 0.6 ± 0.023 | 0.62 ± 0.03 (+3.3%) | 0.63 ± 0.03 (+5.0%) |
| Relative content of monocytes, 2–11%: | |||
| treatment | 9.87±0.31 | 9.94±0.30 (+0.7%) | 11.0±0.46 (+11.4%) |
| control | 9.1±0.23 | 9.16±0.3 (+0.6%) | 9.2±0.33 (1.0%) |
| Neutrophils, 2.0–7.7 × 109 L: | |||
| treatment | 3.58 ± 0.19 | 4.2 ± 0.26 (+17.3%) | 4.0 ± 0.19 (+11.7%) |
| control | 4.24 ± 0.34 | 3.80 ± 0.22 (−10.4%) | 4.11 ± 0.34 (−3.1%) |
| The relative content of neutrophils, 42–72%: | |||
| treatment | 50.7 ± 1.2 | 51.47 ± 1.4 (+1.5%) | 51.63 ± 1.54 (+1.8%) |
| control | 54.5 ± 1.86 | 53.2 ± 2.3 (−4.3%) | 52.67 ± 1.9 (−3.4%) |
| Basophil content, 0.02–0.1 × 109 L: | |||
| treatment | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.024 ± 0.002 (+21.7%) | 0.026 ± 0.001 (+30.0%) |
| control | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.021 ± 0.001 (+5.0%) | 0.02 ± 0.001 (0%) |
Platelets during the food intervention (absolute values)
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Platelets, 180–400 × 109 cells/L: | |||
| treatment | 231.8 ± 6.53 | 242.97 ± 6.9 (+4.8%) | 243.9 ± 8.5 (+5.6%) |
| control | 221.1 ± 11.2 | 229.8 ± 9.35 (+3.9%) | 240.2 ± 11.4 (+8.6%) |
| Relative PDW, 15–17%: | |||
| treatment | 13.55 ± 0.26 | 13.05 ± 0.25 (−3.7%) | 12.84 ± 0.23 (−5.3%) |
| control | 13.97 ± 0.7 | 13.78 ± 0.8 (−1.4%) | 14.35 ± 0.9 (+2.7%) |
| P−LCR, 13–43%: | |||
| treatment | 34.29 ± 1.02 | 32.49 ± 1.05 (−5.3%) | 32.12 ± 1.00 (−6.3%) |
| control | 32.15 ± 3.0 | 29.99 ± 3.1 (−6.8%) | 29.94 ± 2.9 (−6.9%) |
Antioxidant defense system and serum immunoglobulins during the period of food intervention (absolute values).
| Parameter (Reference Values) | Observation Period, М ± m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | 45 Days Later | |
| Antioxidant protection system, μmol/L | |||
| Peroxides, ˂180.0: | |||
| treatment | 542.3 ± 65.8 | 359.3 ± 58.5 (−33.7%) | 201.7 ± 49.8 (−62.8%) |
| control | 535.4 ± 49.8 | 519.5 ± 70.3 (−3.0%) | 485.4 ± 59.8 (−9.4%) |
| Serum antioxidant activity, 280 ± 20.5: | |||
| treatment | 313.9 ± 9.8 | 313.5 ± 13.3 (−0.1%) | 392.2 ± 11.3 (+24.9%) |
| control | 311.5 ± 11.3 | 276.7 ± 9.5 (−11.2%) | 235.4 ± 8.5 (−24.4%) |
| Serum immunoglobulins (g/L) | |||
| IgA, 0.9–4.5: | |||
| treatment | 0.938 ± 0.1 | 1.034 ± 0.12 (+10.2%) | 0.902 ± 0.11 (−3.9%) |
| control | 0.685 ± 0.09 | 0.74 ± 0.09 (+8.0%) | 0.428 ± 0.03 (−37.5%) |
| IgM, 0.6–3.7: | |||
| treatment | 1.258 ± 0.14 | 1.176 ± 0.14 (−6.6%) | 1.803 ± 0.11 (+43.3%) |
| control | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 1.57 ± 0.36 (+80.4%) | 1.34 ± 0.16 (+54.0%) |
| IgG, 8–17: | |||
| treatment | 10.82 ± 1.19 | 11.98 ± 1.28 (+10.7%) | 15.54 ± 1.39 (+43.6%) |
| control | 15.92 ± 1.02 | 15.46 ± 1.39 (−3.1%) | 11.49 ± 1.8 (−27.8%) |
Morbidity patterns in the control group by the most prevalent classes of diseases, %, rank.
| Disease Class | Morbidity Pattern | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | |||
| % | Rank | % | Rank | |
| VI. Diseases of the nervous system | 1.3 | 4 | 1.0 | 4 |
| X. Respiratory diseases | 88.5 | 1 | 88.3 | 1 |
| XI. Diseases of the digestive system | 0.7 | 6 | 0.7 | 6 |
| XII. Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue | 6.3 | 2 | 6.3 | 2 |
| ХIII. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue | 1.0 | 5 | 1.0 | 5 |
| XIX. Injury, poisoning and some other consequences of exposure to external causes | 2.2 | 3 | 2.2 | 3 |
The distribution of diseases by the most prevalent classes during the observation period, ‰.
| Disease Class | Disease Distribution, М ± m | |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | |
| VI. Diseases of the nervous system | 22.2 ± 21.9 | 15.7 ± 7.8 |
| X. Respiratory diseases | 22.2 ± 21.9 | 15.7 ± 7.8 |
| XI. Diseases of the digestive system | 1066.6 ± 39.7 | 1788.4 ± 74.4 |
| XII. Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue | 22.2 ± 21.9 | 125.9 ± 20.8 |
| ХIII. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue | 22.2 ± 21.9 | 15.7 ± 7.8 |
| XIX. Injury, poisoning and some other consequences of exposure to external causes | 66.6 ± 37.2 | 74.8 ± 16.5 |
| Total | 1222.2 ± 77.7 | 2062.9 ± 92.9 |
Primary incidence of diseases of the respiratory system, М±m.
| Disease Class | Morbidity, ‰ | |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | |
| Acute sinusitis | 44.4 ± 30.7 | 78.7 ± 16.9 |
| Acute tonsillitis | 177.7 ± 56.9 | 141.7 ± 21.8 |
| Acute viral respiratory infection of the upper respiratory tract, flu | 822.2 ± 56.9 | 1468.5 ± 52.0 |
| Community-acquired pneumonia | 0.0 | 55.1 |
| Acute viral respiratory infection of the lower respiratory tract | 22.2 ± 21.9 | 35.4 ± 11.6 |
Figure 1Weekly morbidity in students (respiratory system diseases), ‰.The data in Table 13 show that, although the incidence of respiratory diseases in the control group was slightly higher before and during the treatment period (weeks 1–5), the incidence of acute viral respiratory infections of the upper respiratory tract (ARI URT) and flu was almost the same in the two groups. Further, in weeks 6–10, these indicators in the treatment group were lower than in the control group, 3.3 times and 5.6 times, respectively. In weeks 11–19 of the observation, the incidence of respiratory diseases in the treatment group was 2.6 times lower and in weeks 23–27, there was a 10.6-fold decrease in the disease incidence rate. Such a shift was not noted for acute respiratory diseases and flu. It was not earlier than weeks 28–34 when the incidence of ARI, upper respiratory tract infection and influenza began to approach that in the control group (Figure 2).
Figure 3The incidence rate of diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue in the control group by observation weeks, ‰.
Morbidity patterns in the control group by the most prevalent disease classes,%, rank.
| Week of Observation | Respiratory Diseases, Total | ARI of URT and Flu Included | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Control | Treatment | Control | |
| 1–5 | 311.0 | 354.3 | 314.0 | 299.1 |
| 6–10 | 155.5 | 507.9 | 66.7 | 374.0 |
| 11–19 | 88.9 | 228.4 | 0 | 204.7 |
| 20–22 | 66.7 | 47.1 | 66.7 | 47.2 |
| 23–27 | 22.2 | 235.6 | 0 | 204.7 |
| 28–34 | 288.7 | 413.4 | 288.7 | 339.5 |