Literature DB >> 34202594

Safety of Plastic Food Packaging: The Challenges about Non-Intentionally Added Substances (NIAS) Discovery, Identification and Risk Assessment.

Lilian Seiko Kato1,2, Carlos A Conte-Junior1,2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Several food contact materials (FCMs) contain non-intentionally added substances (NIAS), and most of the substances that migrate from plastic food packaging are unknown. This review aimed to situate the main challenges involving unknown NIAS in plastic food packaging in terms of identification, migration tests, prediction, sample preparation, determination methods and risk assessment trials. Most studies have identified NIAS in plastic materials as polyurethane adhesives (PU), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyester coatings, polypropylene materials (PP), multilayers materials, plastic films, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), recycled materials, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Degradation products are almost the primary source of NIAS in plastic FCMs, most from antioxidants as Irganox 1010 and Irgafos 168, following by oligomers and side reaction products. The NIAS assessment in plastics FCMs is usually made by migration tests under worst-case conditions using food simulants. For predicted NIAS, targeted analytical methods are applied using GC-MS based methods for volatile NIAS and GC-MS and LC-MS based methods for semi- and non-volatile NIAS; non-targeted methods to analyze unknown NIAS in plastic FCMs are applied using GC and LC techniques combined with QTOF mass spectrometry (HRMS). In terms of NIAS risk assessment and prioritization, the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concept is the most applied tool for risk assessment. Bioassays with sensitive analytical techniques seem to be an efficient method to identify NIAS and their hazard to human exposure; the combination of genotoxicity testing with analytical chemistry could allow the Cramer class III TTC application to prioritize unknown NIAS. The scientific justification for implementing a molecular weight-based cut-off (<1000 Da) in the risk assessment of FCMs should be reevaluated. Although official guides and opinions are being issued on the subject, the whole chain's alignment is needed, and more specific legislation on the steps to follow to get along with NIAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  additives in polymers; food contact articles (FCAs); food contact materials (FCMs); food packaging additives; food safety; migration study

Year:  2021        PMID: 34202594      PMCID: PMC8271870          DOI: 10.3390/polym13132077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Polymers (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4360            Impact factor:   4.329


  110 in total

1.  Identification and quantification of unknown antioxidants in plastic materials by ultrasonic extraction and ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Hang Wang; Jiaojian Yuan
Journal:  Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.067

Review 2.  Partition coefficients in food/packaging systems: a review.

Authors:  E A Tehrany; S Desobry
Journal:  Food Addit Contam       Date:  2004-12

3.  Identification of unexpected chemical contaminants in baby food coming from plastic packaging migration by high resolution accurate mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Anna Bauer; Florencia Jesús; María José Gómez Ramos; Ana Lozano; Amadeo Rodríguez Fernández-Alba
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 7.514

4.  Determination of volatile non intentionally added substances coming from a starch-based biopolymer intended for food contact by different gas chromatography-mass spectrometry approaches.

Authors:  Jazmín Osorio; Nicola Dreolin; Margarita Aznar; Cristina Nerín; Peter Hancock
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Universal response quantification approach using a Corona Charged Aerosol Detector (CAD) - Application on linear and cyclic oligomers extractable from polycondensate plastics polyesters, polyamides and polyarylsulfones.

Authors:  Martin Eckardt; Marie Kubicova; Thomas J Simat
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Analytical tools for identification of non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) coming from polyurethane adhesives in multilayer packaging materials and their migration into food simulants.

Authors:  Juliana S Félix; Francesca Isella; Osvaldo Bosetti; Cristina Nerín
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Polymer additive migration to foods--a direct comparison of experimental data and values calculated from migration models for polypropylene.

Authors:  A O'Brien; L Cooper
Journal:  Food Addit Contam       Date:  2001-04

8.  Are bioplastics and plant-based materials safer than conventional plastics? In vitro toxicity and chemical composition.

Authors:  Lisa Zimmermann; Andrea Dombrowski; Carolin Völker; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 9.  Analytical Approaches for Analysis of Safety of Modern Food Packaging: A Review.

Authors:  Magdalena Wrona; Cristina Nerín
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bioplastics for Food Packaging: Environmental Impact, Trends and Regulatory Aspects.

Authors:  Rui M S Cruz; Victoria Krauter; Simon Krauter; Sofia Agriopoulou; Ramona Weinrich; Carsten Herbes; Philip B V Scholten; Ilke Uysal-Unalan; Ece Sogut; Samir Kopacic; Johanna Lahti; Ramune Rutkaite; Theodoros Varzakas
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-10-05

2.  Towards recycling of challenging waste fractions: Identifying flame retardants in plastics with optical spectroscopic techniques.

Authors:  Tuomas Sormunen; Sanna Uusitalo; Hannu Lindström; Kirsi Immonen; Juha Mannila; Janne Paaso; Sari Järvinen
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.