| Literature DB >> 34201723 |
Soha S Rizk1, Wafaa H Elwakil1, Ahmed S Attia2.
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is an emerging pathogen, and over the last three decades it has proven to be particularly difficult to treat by healthcare services. It is now regarded as a formidable infectious agent with a genetic setup for prompt development of resistance to most of the available antimicrobial agents. Yet, it is noticed that there is a gap in the literature covering this pathogen especially in countries with limited resources. In this review, we provide a comprehensive updated overview of the available data about A. baumannii, the multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype spread, carbapenem-resistance, and the associated genetic resistance determinants in low-income countries (LIICs) since the beginning of the 21st century. The coverage included three major databases; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Only 52 studies were found to be relevant covering only 18 out of the 29 countries included in the LIC group. Studies about two countries, Syria and Ethiopia, contributed ~40% of the studies. Overall, the survey revealed a wide spread of MDR and alarming carbapenem-resistance profiles. Yet, the total number of studies is still very low compared to those reported about countries with larger economies. Accordingly, a discussion about possible reasons and recommendations to address the issue is presented. In conclusion, our analyses indicated that the reported studies of A. baumannii in the LICs is far below the expected numbers based on the prevailing circumstances in these countries. Lack of proper surveillance systems due to inadequate financial resources could be a major contributor to these findings.Entities:
Keywords: A. baumannii; COVID-19; Ethiopia; MDR; Syria; carbapenem-resistance; developing countries; low-income; surveillance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34201723 PMCID: PMC8300836 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10070764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Figure 1Flow diagram of the search strategy and selection of articles adopted in the current review. The databases were searched in the order (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Accordingly, articles found in the subsequent database(s) were considered a repeat and excluded.
Figure 2Reports of A. baumannii infections in LICs in Sub-Saharan Africa from 2000 to 2020. A geographical map of the Sub-Saharan Africa region highlighting the numbers of reports about A. baumannii infections in the 21 first years of the 21st century. The map was generated using the MapChart web tool (https://mapchart.net/, accessed on 21 June 2021).
A summary of the studies about A. baumannii in LICs from 2000 to 2020.
| Country | Study | Isolates ( | MDR % * | CRAB% | Isolates Characterization | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub-Saharan Africa | ||||||
| Ethiopia | Kempf et al., 2012 | 40 | NA | NA | [ | |
| Lema et al., 2012 | 5 | ≥20% | NA | AST with KB | [ | |
| Pritsch et al., 2017 | 3 | 100% | 100% | AST with KB and VITEK 2, CT102 Micro-Array, real-time PCR, WGS, MLST, and detection of the | [ | |
| Solomon et al., 2017 | 43 | 81% | 37% | AST with KB and phenotypic detection of ESBLs and MBLs | [ | |
| Bitew et al., 2017 | 2 | 100% | NA | Identification and AST with VITEK 2 | [ | |
| Demoz et al., 2018 | 1 | 100% | 100% | AST with KB | [ | |
| Gashaw et al., 2018 | 2 | 50% XDR and 50% PDR | 100% | AST with KB and phenotypic detection of ESBLs and AmpC | [ | |
| Moges et al., 2019 | 15 | ≥63% | Yes | AST with KB and phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases | [ | |
| Admas et al., 2020 | 6 | 100% | NA | Identification and AST with VITEK 2 | [ | |
| Motbainor et al., 2020 | 9 | 100% | 33% | Identification with VITEK 2 and AST with KB | [ | |
| Madagascar | Randrianirina et al., 2010 | 50 | ≥44% | 44% | AST with KB and phenotypic detection of ESBLs | [ |
| Andriamanantena et al., 2010 | 53 | 100% | 100% | AST with KB and MIC determination, phenotypic detection of carbapenemases, ReP-PCR for genotyping and PCR for detection of; | [ | |
| Rasamiravaka et al., 2015 | 10 | ≥50% | 0% | AST with KB | [ | |
| Tchuinte et al., 2019 | 15 | 100% | 100% | MALDI-TOF MS for identification, AST with KB and MIC determination, WGS, MLST for genotyping and WGS detecting; | [ | |
| Eremeeva et al., 2019 | 14 | NA | NA | TaqMan PCR of the | [ | |
| Uganda | Kateete et al., 2016 | 40 | 60% | 38% | AST with Phoenix Automated Microbiology System, PCR for: | [ |
| Kateete et al., 2017 | 20 | 40% | 35% | AST with MIC determination, PAMS, Rep-PCR for genotyping and phenotypic detection of ESBLs and AmpC | [ | |
| Moore et al., 2019 | 3 | NA | NA | qPCR TAC | [ | |
| Aruhomukama et al., 2019 | 1077 | 3% | 3% | AST with KB, PCR for detecting: | [ | |
| Burkina Faso | Kaboré et al., 2016 | 3 | 100% | NA | AST with KB and phenotypic detection of ESBLs | [ |
| Sanou et al., 2021 # | 5 | 100% | 60% | MALDI-TOF MS for identification, AST with KB and MIC determination, phenotypic detection of ESBLs, PCR and sequencing of multiple resistance genes including; | [ | |
| DR of the Congo | Lukuke et al., 2017 | 2 | 0% | NA | API for identification and AST with KB | [ |
| Koyo et al., 2019 | 15 | NA | NA | qPCR and phylogenetic analysis using the | [ | |
| Malawi | Bedell et al., 2012 | 1 | NA | NA | Identification with standard diagnostic techniques | [ |
| Iroh Tam et al., 2019 | 84 | ≥44% | NA | API for identification, AST with KB, and phenotypic detection of ESBLs | [ | |
| Mozambique | Martínez et al., 2016 | 1 | NA | NA | 16S rRNA PCR and MALDI-TOF MS for identification | [ |
| Hurtado et al., 2019 | 1 | 100% | 0% | 16S rRNA for identification and AST with KB | [ | |
| Sudan | Mohamed et al., 2019 | 1 | NA | NA | API for identification followed by WGS | [ |
| Dirar et al., 2020 | 12 | ≥83% | 89% | Identification with PAMS, AST with KB and phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases. | [ | |
| Rwanda | La Scola and Raoult 2004 | 10 | NA | NA | API for identification and | [ |
| Heiden et al., 2020 | 1 | 100% | 0% | MALDI-TOF MS for identification, AST with VITEK 2, phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases, and WGS | [ | |
| Burundi | La Scola and Raoult 2004 | 3 | NA | NA | API for identification and | [ |
| Mali | Doumbia-Singare et al., 2014 | 1 | NA | NA | Not mentioned | [ |
| Sierra Leone | Lakoh et al., 2020 | 14 | ≥40% | 10% | Identification and AST with VITEK 2 | [ |
| Somalia | Mohamed et al., 2020 | 7 | 100% | 100% | AST with KB | [ |
| Niger | Louni et al., 2018 | 29 | NA | NA | qPCR and | [ |
| Central African Republic | No Reports | |||||
| Chad | No Reports | |||||
| Eritrea | No Reports | |||||
| Gambia | No Reports | |||||
| Guinea | No Reports | |||||
| Guinea-Bissau | No Reports | |||||
| Liberia | No Reports | |||||
| South Sudan | No Reports | |||||
| Togo | No Reports | |||||
| Middle East and North Africa | ||||||
| Syria | Hamzeh et al., 2012 | 260 | ≥65% | 65% | Identification and AST with PAMS | [ |
| Teicher et al., 2014 | 6 | 100% | 80% | API for identification and AST with MicroScan Walk-Away System | [ | |
| Peretz et al., 2014 | 5 | 100% | NA | Not mentioned | [ | |
| Rafei et al., 2014 | 4 | 100% | 100% | Identification with | [ | |
| Heydari et al., 2015 | 1 | 100% | 100% | Identification and AST with VITEK 2, phenotypic detection of ESBLs and carbapenemases, PCR for the | [ | |
| Rafei et al., 2015 | 59 | Yes | 74% | Identification with MALDI-TOF MS, | [ | |
| Herard and Fakhri 2017 | 38 | NA | NA | Not mentioned | [ | |
| Salloum et al., 2018 | 2 | 100% | 100% | AST with KB and Etest, PCR for | [ | |
| Fily et al., 2019 | 6 | NA | 67% | AST with KB | [ | |
| Hasde et al., 2019 | 5 | NA | NA | Not mentioned | [ | |
| Yemen | Bakour et al., 2014 | 3 | 100% | 100% | API and MALDI-TOF MS for identification, AST with KB and E-test, phenotypic detection of carbapenemases, PCR detection of: | [ |
| Fily et al., 2019 | 1 | NA | 100% | AST with KB | [ | |
| South Asia | ||||||
| Afghanistan | Sutter et al., 2011 | 57 ¥ | ≥75% | 76% | Identification and AST with MicroScan autoSCAN-4 | [ |
| Latin America and The Caribbean | ||||||
| Haiti | Potron et al., 2011 | 3 | 66.7% | 0% | API and 16sRNA for identification, AST with KB and E-test, phenotypic detection of ESBLs, PCR for detection of: | [ |
| Marra et al., 2012 | 1 | 100% | 0% | Identification and AST with VITEK 2 | [ | |
| Murphy et al., 2016 | 4 | ≥25% | 25% | AST but the method was not indicated | [ | |
| Chaintarli et al., 2018 | 2 | 0% | 0% | Identification and AST with VITEK 2 and phenotypic detection of ESBLs | [ | |
| Roy et al., 2018 | 0 ϕ | NA | NA | Metagenomic analyses of water samples | [ | |
| Europe and Central Asia | ||||||
| Tajikistan | No Reports | |||||
| East Asia and Pacific | ||||||
| Democratic People’s Republic of Korea | No Reports | |||||
Abbreviations: API: Analytical Profile Index, AST: Antibiotic Susceptibility testing, CRAB: Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, KB: Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, MALDI-TOF MS: Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry, MDR: Multi-drug resistant, MLST: Multilocus sequence typing, NA: not available, PAMS; Phoenix Automated Microbiology System, PDR: Pan-drug-resistant, PBRT: PCR-based replicon typing, PCR: Polymerase chain reaction, PFGE: Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis, rep-PCR: Repetitive element sequence-based PCR, WGS: Whole Genome Shotgun, TAC: TaqMan Array Card, XDR: Extensively drug-resistant. * When the MDR% is not directly mentioned, it was presented as ≥lowest % of resistance among the tested antibiotics classes. All %s were approximated to the nearest whole number. # The study was originally published in Jun 2020, then appeared in its final version in Jan 2021. ¥ Acinetobacter spp. Including A. baumannii. ϕ No isolates were obtained but A. baumannii DNA was detected in the samples.
Figure 3A heatmap of the distribution of the number of the publications about A. baumannii in LICs in the first 21 years of the 21st century. The heatmap was generated using GraphPad Prism v9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Figure 4Pie charts of the contributions of the different LICs to the total number of MDR (A) and the CRAB (B) strains included in the reports analyzed in the current review. The percentages were calculated by dividing the number of strains reported in each category in the respective studies divided by the total number of MDR (n = 534) and CRAB (n = 468) strains. The charts were generated using GraphPad Prism v9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).