| Literature DB >> 34201231 |
Tanja Hoffmann1, Imke Carsjens1, Raphaël Rakotozandrindrainy2, Mirko Girmann3, Njary Randriamampionona2, Oumou Maïga-Ascofaré4, Andreas Podbielski5, Andreas Hahn5, Hagen Frickmann1,5, Norbert Georg Schwarz3.
Abstract
This work was conducted as a cross sectional study to define the disease burden of schistosomiasis in pregnant Madagascan women and to evaluate serological and molecular diagnostic assays. A total of 1154 residual EDTA blood samples from pregnant Madagascan women were assessed. The nucleic acid extractions were subjected to in-house real-time PCRs specifically targeting S. mansoni complex, S. haematobium complex, and African Schistosoma spp. on genus level, while the EDTA plasma samples were analyzed using Schistosoma-specific IgG and IgM commercial ELISA and immunofluorescence assays. The analyses indicated an overall prevalence of schistosomiasis in Madagascan pregnant women of 40.4%, with only minor regional differences and differences between serology- and blood PCR-based surveillance. The S. mansoni specific real-time PCR showed superior sensitivity of 74% (specificity 80%) compared with the genus-specific real-time PCR (sensitivity 13%, specificity 100%) in blood. The laborious immunofluorescence (sensitivity IgM 49%, IgG 87%, specificity IgM 85%, IgG 96%) scored only slightly better than the automatable ELISA (sensitivity IgM 38%, IgG 88%, specificity IgM 78%, IgG 91%). Infections with S. mansoni were detected only. The high prevalence of schistosomiasis recorded here among pregnant women in Madagascar calls for actions in order to reduce the disease burden.Entities:
Keywords: Madagascar; blood samples; epidemiology; pregnancy; schistosomiasis; test comparison
Year: 2021 PMID: 34201231 PMCID: PMC8229283 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10060722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Figure 1Map of Madagascar showing the 6 study locations and their altitude. The purple square is the capital Antananarivo; the dark lines represent main roads. The study found no signs of S. haematobium but demonstrated a presence of S. mansoni in all 6 locations [29].
Test results for serological tests searching for IgG and IgM antibodies against Schistosoma spp. and results of 3 different PCR approaches searching species-overarching for Schistosoma spp. in general, and species-specific for S. haematobium and S. mansoni in 6 different locations at Madagascar.
| Immunofluorescence Assays, % Positives * | ELISA, % Positives * | PCRs, % Positives | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Altitude | N | IgM | IgG | IgM | IgG |
|
| |
| Littoral | 187 | 37.4% | 48.7% | 29.4% | 37.4% | 7.5% | 0 | 32.6% |
| Littoral | 231 | 12.6% | 8.2% | 19.9% | 10.8% | 0 | 0 | 24.2% |
| 466 m | 174 | 29.9% | 30.5% | 42.5% | 37.4% | 5.2% | 0 | 41.4% |
| 920 m | 166 | 27.7% | 24.7% | 21.1% | 38.6% | 5.4% | 0 | 36.7% |
| 860 m | 202 | 37.1% | 51.0% | 32.2% | 54.0% | 1.5% | 0 | 50.0% |
| 1280 m | 194 | 29.4% | 63.4% | 29.4% | 71.1% | 14.4% | 0 | 69.1% |
| All sites | 1154 | 28.5% | 37.3% | 28.8% | 40.8% | 5.5% | - | 42.0% |
| Point biserial correlationcoefficient | 1154 | 0.0672 | 0.2360 | 0.0270 | 0.3330 | 0.1183 | 0.2614 | |
* Serological marginals in line the manufacturer’s instructions were not counted as positives. 1 Species-overarching PCR for Schistosoma spp. targeting the ITS-2 region of African Schistosoma spp. 2 S. haematobium PCR targeting the highly repetitive Dra1 region of S. haematobium complex. 3 S. mansoni PCR targeting the highly repetitive Sm1-7 region of S. mansoni complex.
Comparison of test results between serological methods for the detection of schistosomiasis (immunofluorescence assay vs. ELISA, n = 1154).
| % Positive | % Concordant Positive | % Concordant Negative | % Discordant | Kappa (SE) | Kappa Interpretation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IF IgG | Positive | 37.3% | 31.2% | 53.1% | 15.7% | 67.1% (2.9%) | Substantial |
| ELISA IgG | 40.8% | ||||||
| IF IgG | Positive and borderline | 44.5% | 38.0% | 47.0% | 15.1% | 69.6% (2.9%) | Substantial |
| ELISA IgG | 46.5% | ||||||
| IF IgM | Positive | 28.5% | 19.8% | 62.5% | 17.8% | 56.5% (2.9%) | Moderate |
| ELISA IgM | 28.8% | ||||||
| IF IgM | Positive and borderline | 36.1% | 24.4% | 55.2% | 20.4% | 55.1% (2.9%) | Moderate |
| ELISA IgM | 33.2% |
S.E. = standard error.
Comparison of test results between serological methods for the detection of IgM antibodies and PCR methods (immunofluorescence assay vs. ELISA, n = 1154).
| % Positive | % Concordantly Positive | % Concordantly Negative | % Discordant | Kappa (SE) | Kappa Interpretation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IF IgM * | 28.5% | 19.8% | 62.5% | 17.8% | 56.5% (2.9%) | Moderate |
| ELISA IgM * | 28.8% | |||||
| 42.3% | 4.9% | 57.5% | 37.6% | 12.3% (1.5%) | Slight | |
| 5.5% | ||||||
| IF IgM * | 28.5% | 15.9% | 45.3% | 38.8% | 16.6% (2.8%) | Slight |
| 42.3% | ||||||
| IF IgM * | 28.5% | 2.5% | 68.5% | 28.9% | 6.2% (2.0%) | Slight |
| 5.5% | ||||||
| ELISA IgM * | 28.8% | 13.3% | 42.5% | 44.3% | 5.0% (2.8%) | Slight |
| 42.3% | ||||||
| ELISA IgM * | 28.8% | 0.9% | 66.6% | 32.5% | −4.5% (2.0%) | Poor |
| 5.5% |
S.E. = standard error. * Borderlines were not included as positives in the analysis. 1 Species-overarching PCR for Schistosoma spp. targeting the ITS-2 region of African Schistosoma spp. 2 S. mansoni PCR targeting the highly repetitive Sm1-7 region of S. mansoni complex.
Figure 2Comparison of cycle threshold values for the species-overarching PCR for Schistosoma spp. and the S. mansoni-specific PCR for all concordantly positive results.
Test characteristics as calculated based on latent class assessment and the resulting diagnostic accuracy adjusted overall prevalence rate.
| Immunofluorescence Assays | ELISA of | PCR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 1154 | IgM | IgG | IgM | IgG |
|
| |
| Sensitivity | 0.4913 | 0.8696 | 0.3829 | 0.8759 | 0.1349 | - | 0.7406 |
| Specificity | 0.8549 | 0.9647 | 0.7769 | 0.9093 | 0.9999 | - | 0.7971 |
| Prevalence rate (0.95 CI) | 40.4% (36.8%, 44.1%) | ||||||
Phi coefficients to assess potential cross-reactions between anti-malarial and anti-Schistosoma-antibodies as well as comparison with malaria and schistosomiasis PCR. Data for the malaria assessments were taken from a previous publication [29].
| Immunofluorescence | ELISA | PCR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 1154 | IgM | IgG | IgM | IgG |
|
| |
| Phi coefficient * | 0.0372 | 0.1150 | 0.0297 | 0.1417 | 0.1231 | - | 0.1006 |
* for concordance between malaria serology and Schistosoma spp. diagnostics.