| Literature DB >> 32007448 |
Andreas Hahn1, Andreas Podbielski1, Thomas Meyer2, Andreas Erich Zautner3, Ulrike Loderstädt4, Norbert Georg Schwarz4, Andreas Krüger5, Daniel Cadar4, Hagen Frickmann6.
Abstract
Diagnostic testing in the infectious disease laboratory facilitates decision-making by physicians at the bedside as well as epidemiological assessments and surveillance at study level. Problems may arise if test results are uncritically considered as being the same as the unknown true value. To allow a better understanding, the influence of external factors on the interpretation of test results is introduced with the example of prevalence, followed by the presentation of strengths and weaknesses of important techniques in the infectious disease laboratory like microscopy, cultural diagnostics, serology, mass spectrometry, nucleic acid amplification and hypothesis-free metagenomic sequencing with focus on basic, high-technology and potential future approaches. Special problems like multiplex testing as well as uncertainty of test evaluations, if no gold standard is available, are also stressed with a final glimpse on emerging future technologies for the infectious disease laboratory. In the conclusions, suitability for point-of-care-testing and field laboratory applications is summarized. The aim is to illustrate the limitations of diagnostic accuracy to both clinicians and study planners and to stress the importance of close cooperation with experts in laboratory disciplines so as to avoid potentially critical misunderstandings due to inappropriate interpretation of diagnostic test results.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnostic testing; Infectious disease laboratory testing; Limitations; Test accuracy; Test characteristics
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32007448 DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105377
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Trop ISSN: 0001-706X Impact factor: 3.112