| Literature DB >> 34201173 |
Viktoriya Rumyantceva1, Valeriya Rumyantceva1, Yulia Andreeva1, Sofia Tsvetikova1, Anton Radaev2, Maria Vishnevskaya2, Vladimir Vinogradov1, Andrey S Drozdov1,3, Elena Koshel1.
Abstract
Biofilms are the reason for a vast majority of chronic inflammation cases and most acute inflammation. The treatment of biofilms still is a complicated task due to the low efficiency of drug delivery and high resistivity of the involved bacteria to harmful factors. Here we describe a magnetically controlled nanocomposite with a stimuli-responsive release profile based on calcium carbonate and magnetite with an encapsulated antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) that can be used to solve this problem. The material magnetic properties allowed targeted delivery, accumulation, and penetration of the composite in the biofilm, as well as the rapid triggered release of the entrapped antibiotic. Under the influence of an RF magnetic field with a frequency of 210 kHz, the composite underwent a phase transition from vaterite into calcite and promoted the release of ciprofloxacin. The effectiveness of the composite was tested against formed biofilms of E. coli and S. aureus and showed a 71% reduction in E. coli biofilm biomass and an 85% reduction in S. aureus biofilms. The efficiency of the composite with entrapped ciprofloxacin was higher than for the free antibiotic in the same concentration, up to 72%. The developed composite is a promising material for the treatment of biofilm-associated inflammations.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic; antimicrobial effect; biofilm; magnetite; nanocomposite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34201173 PMCID: PMC8229197 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22126187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Characterization of the MNPs. (a) SEM image of MNPs; (b) TEM image of MNPs; (c) XRD pattern of MNPs compared to JCPDS file No. 19–0629; (d) Raman spectra of MNPs collected at various laser beam intensity; (e) DLS analysis of MNPs.
Figure 2(a) SEM image of the magnetic composite particle; (b) the size distribution of hydrodynamic diameters in water solution; (c) XRD pattern of the composite particles; (d) STEM image of magnetic composite particles; (e) STEM image of the magnetic composite particles, in which the developed microstructure can be seen.
Figure 3(a–c) Phase change of vaterite particles into calcite phase monitored by SEM; (d) TEM image of vaterite particle with even distribution of MNPs; (e) TEM image of calcite particle, MNPs are excluded to the surface; (f) release kinetics of ciprofloxacin compared to recrystallization dynamics.
Figure 4(a–c) Under the influence of the RF field, vaterite underwent blast-like destruction with a subsequent crystallization into the calcite phase; (d) under RF irradiation, burst release of ciprofloxacin occurred with (e) a subsequent slow release of the drug.
Efficacy of nanocomposite against the formed biofilms of E. coli and S. aureus.
| Compound | Biofilm Mass after Treatment (М ± SD) | The Efficiency of CF in NC Compared To the Original Form of CF, % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CF 1 in Its Original Form (Free) | CF in NC 2 | ||
|
| |||
| Without compound | 0.951 ± 0.07 | - | |
| NC | 0.516 ± 0.05 | - | |
| NC with 0.15 µg/mL CF | 0.443 ± 0.02 | 0.275 ± 0.02 | 38 |
|
| |||
| Without compound | 1.575 ± 0.08 | - | |
| NC | 0.370 ± 0.02 | - | |
| NC with 2.5 µg/mL CF | 0.853 ± 0.06 | 0.239 ± 0.01 | 72 |
1 Ciprofloxacin. 2 Nanocomposite.
Figure 5Efficacy of nanocomposite against the formed biofilms of (a) E. coli and (b) S. aureus. NC-treatment with a nanocomposite without antibiotic; Cf-treatment with ciprofloxacin; Cf-NC-treatment with ciprofloxacin immobilized in a nanocomposite.
Figure 6Efficacy of magnetite NPs against the formed biofilms: E. coli and S. aureus.
Figure 7LIVE/DEAD staining of E. coli biofilms after treatment with ciprofloxacin 0.15 µg/mL: (a) in its original form; (b) immobilized into a nanocomposite. Confocal microscopy. Pseudocolors: red-dead cells and green-living cells.