| Literature DB >> 34201107 |
Tarek Numair1,2, Daniel Toshio Harrell2,3, Nguyen Tien Huy4, Futoshi Nishimoto4, Yvonne Muthiani5,6, Samson Muuo Nzou5,7, Angkhana Lasaphonh8, Khomsonerasinh Palama8, Tiengkham Pongvongsa8, Kazuhiko Moji4, Kenji Hirayama9, Satoshi Kaneko1,2,5.
Abstract
Digitalization of health information can assist patient information management and improve health services even in low middle-income countries. We have implemented a mother and child health registration system in the study areas of Kenya and Lao PDR to evaluate barriers to digitalization. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 healthcare workers (HCWs) who used the system and analyzed it qualitatively with thematic framework analysis. Quantitatively, we analyzed the quality of recorded data according to missing information by the logistic regression analysis. The qualitative analysis identified six themes related to digitalization: satisfaction with the system, mothers' resistance, need for training, double work, working environment, and other resources. The quantitative analysis showed that data entry errors improved around 10% to 80% based on odds ratios in subsequent quarters compared to first quarter periods. The number of registration numbers was not significantly related to the data quality, but the motivation, including financial incentives among HCWs, was related to the registration behavior. Considering both analysis results, workload and motivation to maintain high performance were significant obstacles to implementing a digital health system. We recommend enhancing the scope and focus on human needs and satisfaction as a significant factor for digital system durability and sustainability.Entities:
Keywords: antenatal care; cloud-based system; health record digitalization; mother and child health; postnatal care
Year: 2021 PMID: 34201107 PMCID: PMC8228682 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Study sites and health facility locations: (a) Kwale county in Kenya: Kwale District Hospital, Kinango Hospital, Diani Health Clinic, Mwaluphamba Dispensary, Mwachinga Dispensary, and Vyongwani Dispensary; (b) Savannakhet province in Lao PDR: Songhkone District Hospital, Lahanam Health Center, Xepon District Hospital, Dongsavanh Health Center, Manchy Health Center.
Job titles of healthcare workers interviewed after working in the WIRE system.
| Job Titles | Kenya | Lao PDR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nurses | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| Midwife | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Doctors | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Community health worker | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Medical assistant in primary healthcare | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Operator (recruited for the study) | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Summary of comments for themes and sub-themes.
| Themes/Sub-Themes | Number of Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lao PDR | Kenya | ||
| Theme 1: Satisfaction with the system * | 15 | 8 | |
| Theme 2: Mother’s resistance | 3 | 6 | |
| Theme 3: Need for training on the system | 11 | 1 | |
| Theme 4: Double work perception * | 20 | 15 | |
| Theme 5: Need for a better working environment * | Theme 5a: Internet | 18 | 4 |
| Theme 5b: Hardware | 1 | 9 | |
| Theme 5c: Desk and space | -- | 4 | |
| Theme 5d: Power supply | -- | 2 | |
| Theme 6: Need for resources | 5 | 6 | |
| Total comments | 73 | 55 | |
*: Most frequent themes resulted from in-depth interviews.
Figure 2Numbers of registration at antenatal care (ANC) visits and postnatal care (PNC) visits per quarter in two study areas. In Lao PDR, there were delayed financial incentives in Q5 and Q7 (*). In Kenya, there was no registration process during Q4–Q8 because of the national nurses’ strike. Quarters in Kenya: from April 2017 (Q1) until April 2020 (Q13); those in Lao PDR: from August 2017 (Q1) until January 2020 (Q10).
Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis to percentile intervals in monthly registration numbers and number of visits analyses * to evaluate data entry quality in both study areas, Lao PDR, and Kenya.
| Lao PDR | Kenya | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | ANC a ( | Demographics b ( | PNC c ( | ANC a ( | Demographics b ( | PNC c ( | ||||||
| OR d | 95% CI e | OR d | 95% CI e | OR d | 95% CI e | OR d | 95% CI e | OR d | 95% CI e | OR d |
| |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
|
| 0.73 | 0.66–0.81 | 0.56 | 0.37–0.86 | 1.07 | 0.61–1.88 | 0.89 | 0.76–1.03 | 0.39 | 0.31–0.49 | 1.31 | 1.08–1.57 |
|
| 0.76 | 0.68–0.84 | 0.66 | 0.43–1.02 | 0.57 | 0.35–0.92 | 1.37 | 1.18–1.6 | 0.24 | 0.19–0.29 | 1.27 | 1.05–1.53 |
|
| 1.69 | 1.51–1.89 | 1.02 | 0.62–1.65 | 0.86 | 0.52–1.44 | 1.97 | 1.73–2.25 | 0.22 | 0.18–0.27 | 1.34 | 1.12–1.59 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Reference | NA g | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
|
| 0.73 | 0.54–0.98 | 0.13 | 0.06–0.28 | 0.98 | 0.61–1.59 | NA f | 0.26 | 0.18–0.37 | |||
|
| 0.31 | 0.07–1.4 | 0.14 | 0.02–1.27 | 1.14 | 0.42–3.07 | 0.11 | 0.03–0.39 | ||||
|
| 0.42 | 0.16–1.11 | No visits | 2.05 | 0.65–6.48 | No visits | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||||||
|
| 0.91 | 0.77–1.07 | 1.09 | 0.52–2.29 | 0.89 | 0.37–2.16 | 0.33 | 0.28–0.38 | 1.77 | 1.49–2.1 | 1.05 | 0.76–1.45 |
|
| 0.52 | 0.4–0.62 | 1.04 | 0.47–2.29 | 0.76 | 0.31–1.91 | 16.1 | 3.92–65.79 | 7.99 | 1.96–32.55 | 3.33 | 0.81–13.72 |
|
| 0.56 | 0.47–0.67 | 0.71 | 0.36–1.41 | 0.58 | 0.25–1.37 | NA f | |||||
|
| 0.71 | 0.58–0.87 | 0.85 | 0.38–1.88 | 2.15 | 0.58–8.03 | ||||||
|
| 0.56 | 0.47–0.67 | 0.64 | 0.34–1.18 | 1.65 | 0.65–4.22 | ||||||
|
| 0.48 | 0.4–0.57 | 0.31 | 0.17–0.54 | 1.08 | 0.44–2.64 | ||||||
|
| 0.43 | 0.36–0.51 | 0.23 | 0.13–0.39 | 1.22 | 0.48–3.1 | ||||||
|
| 0.55 | 0.46–0.66 | 0.59 | 0.29–1.17 | 0.86 | 0.38–1.96 | 0.31 | 0.24–0.39 | 0.96 | 0.82–1.13 | 0.47 | 0.34–0.67 |
|
| 0.19 | 0.17–0.23 | 1.71 | 0.63–4.57 | 0.44 | 0.21–0.92 | 0.21 | 0.17–0.25 | 2.34 | 1.95–2.83 | 0.47 | 0.35–0.63 |
|
| NA f | 0.13 | 0.11–0.16 | 5.03 | 3.8–6.66 | 0.55 | 0.41–0.73 | |||||
|
| 0.16 | 0.13–0.19 | 9.1 | 5.78–14.32 | 1.16 | 0.85–1.58 | ||||||
|
| 0.18 | 0.11–0.27 | 8.42 | 2.67–26.48 | 3.67 | 1.82–7.42 | ||||||
*: We summed up the presence or absence of the required items listed below for each dataset and created outcome variables as dichotomous variables according to whether they were higher (=1) or lower (=0) than the mean value.; a: for the antenatal care (ANC), essential variables were medical staff conducting visit, gestation week, type of service, weight, blood pressure, fundal height, fetus head position, fetus position, fetal heart rate, fetal movement, urine analysis result, paleness, mother condition, fetal condition, and fetal abnormal-maturity; b: for the demographics, those were birthdate, date of registration, address, health facility, and sex for infants; c: for postnatal care, those were medical staff conducting visits, age of the infant, temperature, weight, height, type of investigations, and abnormal condition comments.; d: odds ratio; e: 95% confidence interval; f: Monthly registration number: categorical variable based on the 25% percentile interval; h: The number of visits’ record: categorical variable based on the total number of visits for each client; g: not applicable.