| Literature DB >> 34200107 |
Vito Crincoli1, Angela Pia Cazzolla2, Mariasevera Di Comite1, Lorenzo Lo Muzio2, Domenico Ciavarella2, Mario Dioguardi2, Maria Eleonora Bizzoca2, Giuseppe Palmieri3, Antonietta Fontana4, Arcangela Giustino5, Michele Di Cosola2, Brescia Vincenzo4, Roberto Lovero4, Francesca Di Serio4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of vitamin D (25OHD) and other bone biomarkers in patients with third molar impaction (TMI). Thirty males and 30 females with unilateral or bilateral impacted mandibular third molar, and 15 males and 15 females as a control group (CG) were recruited. Rx-OPT was used to evaluate dental position and Pederson index to measure the difficulty of the intervention. Bone biomarkers were measured through blood venous sample in TMI group and CG. Mann-Whitney test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, linear regression model were used to compare the different parameters in the two groups. 25OHD showed lower values in TMI group than in CG (p < 0.05) with values significantly lower in bilateral impaction (p < 0.05). Pearson's coefficient for 25OHD presented a negative correlation with the Pederson index (ρ = -0.75). Bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) showed significantly lower dosage in TMI group than CG (p = 0.02), Pearson's coefficient for BALP presented a negative correlation with the Pederson index. Serum calcium, serum phosphorus, ionized calcium levels in TMI and CG groups were similar and Mann-Whitney test did not significantly differ between TMI and CG. TMI could be a sign of vitamin D deficiency and of low BALP levels that should be investigated.Entities:
Keywords: ALPL protein; alkaline phosphatase; human; impacted; mandible/growth and development; molar; third; tooth; tooth eruption; vitamin D; vitamin D deficiency
Year: 2021 PMID: 34200107 PMCID: PMC8228145 DOI: 10.3390/nu13061938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
a. Demographic characteristics of the Third Molar Impaction (TMI) group and controls b. Type of third molar impaction in the TMI group and male/female subgroups.
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Age | 29 ± 9 | 28± 8 | |
| Men age | 29 ± 11 | 28 ± 11 | |
| Female age | 27 ± 6 | 28 ± 9 | |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Unilateral | 46 (77%) | 22 (73%) | 24 (80%) |
| Bilateral | 14 (23%) | 8 (27%) | 6 (20%) |
a. Winter classification, b. Pell and Gregory’s classification, and c. Pederson index: difficulty score is the sum of the score relating to Winter’s and Pell and Gregory’s classifications.
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Mesioangular | Long axis of the 3rd molar inclined in mesial direction parallel to the 2nd molar. | 1 |
| Horizontal | Long axis of the 3rd molar perpendicular to the 2nd molar. | 2 |
| Vertical | Long axis of the 3rd molar parallel to 2nd molar. | 3 |
| Distoangular | Long axis of the 3rd molar inclined in distal direction to 2nd molar. | 4 |
| Inverted | Crown of the 3rd molar directed to basilar of the mandible. | 5 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Class I | There is sufficient space between the ramus and the distal part of the 2nd molar for the accommodation of the mesiodistal diameter of the 3rd molar. | 1 |
| Class II | The space between the 2nd molar and the mandible ramus is less than the mesiodistal diameter of the 3rd molar. | 2 |
| Class III | All or most of the 3rd molar is in the ramus of the mandible. | 3 |
| Position A | The occlusal plane of the impacted tooth is the same level as the occlusal plane of the 2nd molar. | 1 |
| Position B | The occlusal plane of the impacted tooth is between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the 2nd molar. | 2 |
| Position C | The impacted tooth is below the cervical line of the 2nd molar. | 3 |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
| 1. easy | 3–4 | |
| 2. moderate | 5–6 | |
| 3. difficult | 7–10 | |
Figure 1(a–c) Median with interquartile range of serum Vitamin D dosage (ng/mL) in TMI vs. CG (a), in U-TMI vs. B-TMI (b) and male vs. female TMI patients (c); (d–f) median with interquartile range of ionized calcium dosage (μg/L) in TMI vs. CG (d), in U-TMI vs. B-TMI (e) and M-TMI vs. F-TMI patients (f); (g–i) median with interquartile range of serum calcium dosage (mg/dL) in TMI vs. CG (g), in U-TMI vs. B-TMI (h) and male and female TMI patients (i); (j–l) median with interquartile range of ionized calcium dosage (mg/dL) in TMI vs. CG (j), in U-TMI vs. B-TMI (k) and male and female TMI patients (l); (m–o) median with interquartile range of ionized calcium dosage (mg/dL) in TMI vs. CG (m), in U-TMI vs. B-TMI (n) and M-TMI vs. F-TMI patients (o). Abbreviations CG control group, U-TMI unilateral third molar impaction, B-TMI bilateral third molar impaction, M-TMI third molar impaction for males, F-TMI third molar impaction for females; * denotes a significant statistically differences.
Figure 2Evaluation of the correlation coefficients of the parameters taken into consideration.
Guide to interpretation of the correlation coefficient.
| Correlation Coefficient | Medicine (Chan YH) |
|---|---|
| +1 −1 | Perfect |
| +0.9 −0.9 | Very Strong |
| +0.8 −0.8 | Very Strong |
| +0.7 −0.7 | Moderate |
| +0.6 −0.6 | Moderate |
| +0.5 −0.5 | Fair |
| +0.4 −0.4 | Fair |
| +0.3 −0.3 | Fair |
| +0.2 −0.2 | Poor |
| +0.1 −0.1 | Poor |
| 0 0 | None |
Figure 3(a) Regression line score vs. vitamin D; (b) verification of hypotheses of linearity by studying the residuals with respect to the theoretical values of the model. The graph shows a slight asymmetry around 0, which could be considered acceptable in view of the number of samples; (c) verification of the residues’ normality, comparing those utilized in the model to a standard normal distribution. The hypothesis is fully respected and verified by the Shapiro-Wilk test (p-value = 0.83); (d) verification of homoskedasticity, comparing the square root of the standard residuals to the model’s values. Although the graph does not show an ideal situation, homoskedasticity was verified by the Breusch-Pagan test (p-value observed > 0.05).