| Literature DB >> 34198682 |
Tsutomu Inoue1, Eito Kozawa2, Masahiro Ishikawa3, Hirokazu Okada1.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indispensable in clinical medicine for the morphological and tomographic evaluation of many parenchymal organs. With varied imaging methods, diverse biological information, such as the perfusion volume and measurements of metabolic products, can be obtained. In addition to conventional MRI for morphological assessment, diffusion-weighted MRI/diffusion tensor imaging is used to evaluate white matter structures in the brain; arterial spin labeling is used for cerebral blood flow evaluation; magnetic resonance elastography for fatty liver and cirrhosis evaluation; magnetic resonance spectroscopy for evaluation of metabolites in specific regions of the brain; and blood oxygenation level-dependent imaging for neurological exploration of eating behavior, obesity, and food perception. This range of applications will continue to expand in the future. Nutritional science is a multidisciplinary and all-inclusive field of research; therefore, there are many different applications of MRI. We present a literature review of MRI techniques that can be used to evaluate the nutritional status, particularly in patients on dialysis. We used MEDLINE as the information source, conducted a keyword search in PubMed, and found that, as a nutritional evaluation method, MRI has been used frequently to comprehensively and quantitatively evaluate muscle mass for the determination of body composition.Entities:
Keywords: arterial spin labeling; blood oxygenation level-dependent; dialysis patients; diffusion tensor imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; nutritional status
Year: 2021 PMID: 34198682 PMCID: PMC8232261 DOI: 10.3390/nu13062037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
A summary of the various MRI methods used in nutrition-related clinical studies reviewed in this article.
| Imaging Procedure | Primary Evaluation Objective | Example of Use | Nutrition-Related Clinical Study Included |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional MRI | Structural Evaluation based on proton distribution. |
Measurement of the location and volume of adipose tissue and muscle tissue. Assessment of the volume of the brain and other parenchymal organs. | Addeman, B.T. et al. [ |
| Diffusion Tensor | Evaluation of microstructure in the tissue based on the anisotropy of thermal diffusion of protons. |
Assessment of the degree of degeneration and development of cerebral white matter based on nerve fiber structure. | Drew, D.A. et al. [ |
| Arterial Spin | Evaluation of tissue perfusion using magnetically labeled protons as an endogenous tracer |
Assessment of the changes in regional blood flow in the brain | de Rooij, S.R. et al. [ |
| Magnetic Resonance | Evaluation of organ elasticity based on strain when the organ is vibrated. |
Evaluation of progression of liver diseases, such as cirrhosis, fatty liver, etc. It mainly evaluates changes due to fibrosis of organs. | Furlan, A. et al. [ |
| Magnetic Resonance | Evaluation of the amount and spatial distribution of various molecular compounds, based on the principles of NMR. |
Evaluation of various metabolites in the brain, including N-acetyl aspartate, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamine, and lactate, by 1H-MRS. | Artzi, M. et al. [ |
| Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent-MRI | Assessment of brain activation sites via increased regional cerebral blood flow from changes in deoxyhemoglobin concentration. |
Identification of changes in activity and functional areas of the brain associated with appetite, nutritional intake, and eating behavior. | Belaich, R. et al. [ |
Figure 1Separated fat (A) and water (B) MRI of an obese individual. Panel (C) depicts the fat overlayed in color on the water grayscale image. From Seabolt et al. (2015), with permission.
Figure 2Cross-sectional area of epidural fat (EF) * and the spinal canal **. From Ishihara et al. (2019), with permission.
Association of metabolic syndrome with SEL.
| Prevalence of SEL | Odds Ratio * | 95% CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolic syndrome | No ( | 7.1% ( | <0.01 | Ref. |
| |
| Yes ( | 19.3% ( | 3.9 | 1.5–9.8 |
CI, confidence interval; SEL, spinal epidural lipomatosis; Ref., reference value. * Adjusted for age, gender, smoking habit, and drinking history. From Ishihara et al. (2019), with permission.