Literature DB >> 30529886

Dietary sugars and non-caloric sweeteners elicit different homeostatic and hedonic responses in the brain.

A M van Opstal1, I Kaal2, A A van den Berg-Huysmans2, M Hoeksma3, C Blonk3, H Pijl4, S A R B Rombouts5, J van der Grond2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The brain is essential in regulating intake of food and beverages by balancing energy homeostasis, which is regulated by the hypothalamus, with reward perception, which is regulated by the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ingestion of glucose, fructose, sucrose, and sucralose (a non-caloric artificial sweetener) on the magnitude and trajectory of the hypothalamic and the VTA blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses.
METHOD: In five visits, 16 healthy men between 18 to 25 y of age with a body mass index between 20 and 23 kg/m2 drank five interventions in a randomized order while a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan was taken. The interventions consisted of 50 g of glucose, fructose, or sucrose, or 0.33 g of sucralose dissolved in 300 mL tap water. The control condition consisted of 300 mL of plain tap water. BOLD signals were determined in the hypothalamus and the VTA within a manually drawn region of interest. Differences in changes in BOLD signal between stimuli were analyzed using mixed models.
RESULTS: Compared with the control condition, a decrease in BOLD signal in the hypothalamus was found after ingestion of glucose (P = 0.0003), and a lesser but delayed BOLD response was found after ingestion of sucrose (P = 0.006) and fructose (P = 0.003). Sucralose led to a smaller and transient response from the hypothalamus (P = 0.026). In the VTA, sucralose led to a very similar response to the water control condition, leading to an increase in VTA BOLD activity that continued over the measured time period. The natural sugars appeared to only lead to a transient increase in VTA activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Glucose induces a deactivation in the hypothalamus immediately after ingestion and continued over the next 12 min, which is correlated with satiety signaling by the brain. Fructose and sucrose are both associated with a delayed and lesser response from the hypothalamus, likely because the sugars first have to be metabolized by the body. Sucralose leads to the smallest and most transient decrease in BOLD in the hypothalamus and leads to a similar response as plain water in the VTA, which indicates that sucralose might not have a similar satiating effect on the brain as the natural sugars.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary sugar; Dietary sweeteners; Functional brain responses; Homeostasis; Hypothalamus; Reward system; Ventral tegmental area

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30529886     DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrition        ISSN: 0899-9007            Impact factor:   4.008


  13 in total

Review 1.  Dissecting ultra-processed foods and drinks: Do they have a potential to impact the brain?

Authors:  Oren Contreras-Rodriguez; Montserrat Solanas; Rosa M Escorihuela
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Excessive Fructose Intake Impairs Baroreflex Sensitivity and Led to Elevated Blood Pressure in Rats.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Chen; Chih-Hsun Chu; Shu-Wei Wen; Chi-Cheng Lai; Pei-Wen Cheng; Ching-Jiunn Tseng
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Effects of the Daily Consumption of Stevia on Glucose Homeostasis, Body Weight, and Energy Intake: A Randomised Open-Label 12-Week Trial in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Nikoleta S Stamataki; Benjamin Crooks; Abubaker Ahmed; John T McLaughlin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  The Impact of Artificial Sweeteners on Body Weight Control and Glucose Homeostasis.

Authors:  Michelle D Pang; Gijs H Goossens; Ellen E Blaak
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 5.  Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Nutritional Status: A Literature Review with Focus on Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Tsutomu Inoue; Eito Kozawa; Masahiro Ishikawa; Hirokazu Okada
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Effect of flavor on neuronal responses of the hypothalamus and ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  A M van Opstal; A A van den Berg-Huysmans; M Hoeksma; C Blonk; H Pijl; S A R B Rombouts; J van der Grond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Impacts of Acute Sucralose and Glucose on Brain Activity during Food Decisions in Humans.

Authors:  Xiaobei Zhang; Shan Luo; Sabrina Jones; Eustace Hsu; Kathleen A Page; John R Monterosso
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  How Does Our Brain Process Sugars and Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Differently: A Systematic Review on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Andy Wai Kan Yeung; Natalie Sui Miu Wong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  The Gut-Brain Axis and Its Role in Controlling Eating Behavior in Intestinal Inflammation.

Authors:  Gordon William Moran; Gita Thapaliya
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Obesity and Sex-Related Associations With Differential Effects of Sucralose vs Sucrose on Appetite and Reward Processing: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Alexandra G Yunker; Jasmin M Alves; Shan Luo; Brendan Angelo; Alexis DeFendis; Trevor A Pickering; John R Monterosso; Kathleen A Page
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.