Literature DB >> 34197145

Application of the truth and reconciliation model to meaningfully engage deaf sign language users in the research process.

Melissa L Anderson1, Timothy Riker1, Alexander M Wilkins1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: One of the most underrepresented public health populations is the U.S. Deaf community-a minority group of 500,000 + individuals who communicate using American Sign Language (ASL). Research on Deaf health outcomes is significantly lacking due to inaccessible research procedures and mistrust of researchers that stems from historical mistreatment of Deaf people (i.e., Audism).
METHODS: Following the Truth and Reconciliation Model, we hosted three Deaf community forums between October and November 2016 across New England. We invited attendees to share their experiences in the research world and make recommendations about how researchers can better include Deaf people in their studies. A select group of hearing researchers served as representatives of the research community and to issue a formal apology on behalf of this community.
RESULTS: Forum attendees (n = 22; 5% racial/ethnic minority; 59% female) emphasized the following themes: Research conducted within general population samples is not an activity in which Deaf people can or will be included; a general mistrust of hearing people, including hearing researchers; researchers' frequent failure to communicate study results back to the Deaf community or the community-at-large; and a tendency of researchers to directly benefit from data provided by Deaf participants, without making any subsequent efforts to return to the community to give back or provide useful intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Many injustices and forms of mistreatment are still ongoing; therefore, we recognize that our team's efforts to foster an open dialogue between the research community and the Deaf community must be an ongoing, iterative practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34197145      PMCID: PMC8720115          DOI: 10.1037/cdp0000445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol        ISSN: 1077-341X


  20 in total

1.  Cross-cultural ethics in the conduct of deafness research.

Authors:  Robert Q Pollard
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Community based participatory research: a promising approach for increasing epidemiology's relevance in the 21st century.

Authors:  Margaret W Leung; Irene H Yen; Meredith Minkler
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Community participatory research with deaf sign language users to identify health inequities.

Authors:  Steven Barnett; Jonathan D Klein; Robert Q Pollard; Vincent Samar; Deirdre Schlehofer; Matthew Starr; Erika Sutter; Hongmei Yang; Thomas A Pearson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Bringing translation out of the shadows: translation as an issue of methodological significance in cross-cultural qualitative research.

Authors:  Josephine Pui-Hing Wong; Maurice Kwong-Lai Poon
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.959

5.  Deaf poets' society: subverting the hearing paradigm.

Authors:  S Burch
Journal:  Lit Med       Date:  1997

6.  Addressing the Challenges of Research With Small Populations.

Authors:  Diane M Korngiebel; Maile Taualii; Ralph Forquera; Raymond Harris; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Toward ethical research practice with deaf participants.

Authors:  Jenny L Singleton; Gabrielle Jones; Shilpa Hanumantha
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 8.  Language deprivation syndrome: a possible neurodevelopmental disorder with sociocultural origins.

Authors:  Wyatte C Hall; Leonard L Levin; Melissa L Anderson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  Deaf Qualitative Health Research: Leveraging Technology to Conduct Linguistically and Sociopolitically Appropriate Methods of Inquiry.

Authors:  Melissa L Anderson; Timothy Riker; Kurt Gagne; Stephanie Hakulin; Todd Higgins; Jonah Meehan; Elizabeth Stout; Emma Pici-D'Ottavio; Kelsey Cappetta; Kelly S Wolf Craig
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2018-06-11

Review 10.  Barriers and Facilitators of Health Literacy among D/deaf Individuals: A Review Article.

Authors:  Tahereh Naseribooriabadi; Farahnaz Sadoughi; Abbas Sheikhtaheri
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.