Literature DB >> 34188195

Stresses affect inbreeding depression in complex ways: disentangling stress-specific genetic effects from effects of initial size in plants.

Tobias M Sandner1, Diethart Matthies2, Donald M Waller3.   

Abstract

The magnitude of inbreeding depression (ID) varies unpredictably among environments. ID often increases in stressful environments suggesting that these expose more deleterious alleles to selection or increase their effects. More simply, ID could increase under conditions that amplify phenotypic variation (CV²), e.g., by accentuating size hierarchies among plants. These mechanisms are difficult to distinguish when stress increases both ID and phenotypic variation. We grew in- and outbred progeny of Mimulus guttatus under six abiotic stress treatments (control, waterlogging, drought, nutrient deficiency, copper addition, and clipping) with and without competition by the grass Poa palustris. ID differed greatly among stress treatments with δ varying from 7% (control) to 61% (waterlogging) but did not consistently increase with stress intensity. Poa competition increased ID under nutrient deficiency but not other stresses. Analyzing effects of initial size on performance of outbred plants suggests that under some conditions (low N, clipping) competition increased ID by amplifying initial size differences. In other cases (e.g., high ID under waterlogging), particular environments amplified the deleterious genetic effects of inbreeding suggesting differential gene expression. Interestingly, conditions that increased the phenotypic variability of inbred progeny regularly increased ID whereas variability among outbred progeny showed no relationship to ID. Our study reconciles the stress- and phenotypic variability hypotheses by demonstrating how specific conditions (rather than stress per se) act to increase ID. Analyzing CV² separately in inbred and outbred progeny while including effects of initial plant size improve our ability to predict how ID and gene expression vary across environments.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34188195     DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00454-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  28 in total

1.  An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck.

Authors:  N Bierne; A Tsitrone; P David
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man.

Authors:  J F CROW
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1958-02       Impact factor: 0.553

3.  Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments.

Authors:  P Armbruster; D H Reed
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Inbreeding depression under intraspecific competition in a highly outcrossing population of Crepis sancta (Asteraceae): evidence for frequency-dependent variation.

Authors:  P O Cheptou; J Lepart; J Escarré
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Mutational load, inbreeding depression and heterosis in subdivided populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Plant mating systems affect adaptive plasticity in response to herbivory.

Authors:  Stuart A Campbell; Rayko Halitschke; Jennifer S Thaler; André Kessler
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.417

8.  Severe inbreeding depression is predicted by the "rare allele load" in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Keely E Brown; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Relatively weak inbreeding depression in selfing but also in outcrossing populations of North American Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  S Carleial; M van Kleunen; M Stift
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Habitat effects on reproductive phenotype, pollinator behavior, fecundity, and mating outcomes of a bumble bee-pollinated herb.

Authors:  Hao Tian; Lawrence D Harder; Ai-Ying Wang; Da-Yong Zhang; Wan-Jin Liao
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.325

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.