Literature DB >> 16077737

Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments.

P Armbruster1, D H Reed.   

Abstract

Understanding the consequences of inbreeding has important implications for a wide variety of topics in population biology. Although it is often stated in the literature that the deleterious effects of inbreeding (inbreeding depression) are expected to be more pronounced under stressful than benign conditions, this issue remains unresolved and controversial. We review the current literature on the relationship between the magnitude of inbreeding depression and environmental stress and calculate haploid lethal equivalents expressed under relatively benign and stressful conditions based on data from 34 studies. Inbreeding depression increases under stress in 76% of cases, although this increase is only significant in 48% of the studies considered. Estimates of lethal equivalents are significantly greater under stressful (mean = 1.45, median = 1.02) than relatively benign (mean = 0.85, median = 0.61) conditions. This amounts to an approximately 69% increase in inbreeding depression in a stressful vs a benign environment. However, we find strong lineage effects to be ubiquitous among studies that examine inbreeding depression in multiple environments, and a prevalence of conditionally expressed deleterious effects within lineages that are uncorrelated across environments. These results have important implications for both evolutionary and conservation biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16077737     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  140 in total

1.  New perspectives on the evolution of plant mating systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karron; Christopher T Ivey; Randall J Mitchell; Michael R Whitehead; Rod Peakall; Andrea L Case
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Mating system shifts on the trailing edge.

Authors:  Donald A Levin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Reproductive isolation during domestication.

Authors:  Hannes Dempewolf; Kathryn A Hodgins; Sonja E Rummell; Norman C Ellstrand; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion.

Authors:  Deepa Agashe; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Reduction in the cumulative effect of stress-induced inbreeding depression due to intragenerational purging in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L S Enders; L Nunney
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Genetic rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant.

Authors:  Yvonne Willi; Mark van Kleunen; Stefan Dietrich; Markus Fischer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten N Kristensen; J Stuart F Barker; Kamilla S Pedersen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Maternal sex effects and inbreeding depression under varied environmental conditions in gynodioecious Fragaria vesca subsp. bracteata.

Authors:  Rebecca M Dalton; Matthew H Koski; Tia-Lynn Ashman
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Determinants of extinction in fragmented plant populations: Crepis sancta (Asteraceae) in urban environments.

Authors:  Antoine Dornier; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Genetic variation, inbreeding and chemical exposure--combined effects in wildlife and critical considerations for ecotoxicology.

Authors:  A Ross Brown; David J Hosken; François Balloux; Lisa K Bickley; Gareth LePage; Stewart F Owen; Malcolm J Hetheridge; Charles R Tyler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.