Literature DB >> 31710100

Severe inbreeding depression is predicted by the "rare allele load" in Mimulus guttatus.

Keely E Brown1, John K Kelly1.   

Abstract

Most flowering plants are hermaphroditic and experience strong pressures to evolve self-pollination (automatic selection and reproductive assurance). Inbreeding depression (ID) can oppose selection for selfing, but it remains unclear if ID is typically strong enough to maintain outcrossing. To measure the full cost of sustained inbreeding on fitness, and its genomic basis, we planted highly homozygous, fully genome-sequenced inbred lines of yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) in the field next to outbred plants from crosses between the same lines. The cost of full homozygosity is severe: 65% for survival and 86% for lifetime seed production. Accounting for the unmeasured effect of lethal and sterile mutations, we estimate that the average fitness of fully inbred genotypes is only 3-4% that of outbred competitors. The genome sequence data provide no indication of simple overdominance, but the number of rare alleles carried by a line, especially within rare allele clusters nonrandomly distributed across the genome, is a significant negative predictor of fitness measurements. These findings are consistent with a deleterious allele model for ID. High variance in rare allele load among lines and the genomic distribution of rare alleles both suggest that migration might be an important source of deleterious alleles to local populations.
© 2019 The Authors. Evolution © 2019 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Field fitness; inbreeding depression; monkeyflower; rare alleles

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31710100     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  5 in total

1.  Assessing ex situ genetic and ecogeographic conservation in a threatened but widespread oak after range-wide collecting effort.

Authors:  Bethany A Zumwalde; Bailie Fredlock; Emily Beckman Bruns; Drew Duckett; Ross A McCauley; Emma Suzuki Spence; Sean Hoban
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 2.  Review: evolutionary drivers of agricultural adaptation in Lolium spp.

Authors:  Maor Matzrafi; Christopher Preston; Caio Augusto Brunharo
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.845

3.  Slow Recovery from Inbreeding Depression Generated by the Complex Genetic Architecture of Segregating Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Paula E Adams; Anna B Crist; Ellen M Young; John H Willis; Patrick C Phillips; Janna L Fierst
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 8.800

4.  Domestication reshaped the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in a maize landrace compared to its wild relative, teosinte.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Samayoa; Bode A Olukolu; Chin Jian Yang; Qiuyue Chen; Markus G Stetter; Alessandra M York; Jose de Jesus Sanchez-Gonzalez; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Peter J Bradbury; Maria Cinta Romay; Qi Sun; Jinliang Yang; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Edward S Buckler; John F Doebley; James B Holland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Stresses affect inbreeding depression in complex ways: disentangling stress-specific genetic effects from effects of initial size in plants.

Authors:  Tobias M Sandner; Diethart Matthies; Donald M Waller
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.