J Thannesberger1, N Rascovan2, A Eisenmann1, I Klymiuk3, C Zittra4, H P Fuehrer4, T Scantlebury-Manning5, M Gittens-St Hilaire6, S Austin7, R C Landis8, C Steininger9. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria. 2. Department of Genomes & Genetics, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. 3. Department of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. 4. Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria. 5. Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Bridgetown, Barbados. 6. Leptospirosis Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Bridgetown, Barbados. 7. Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Cave Hill, Barbados. 8. Edmund Cohen Laboratory for Vascular Research, George Alleyne Chronic Disease Research Centre, The University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados. 9. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria. christoph.steininger@meduniwien.ac.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic of 2015/2016 spread throughout numerous countries. It emerged in mainland Latin America and spread to neighboring islands, including the Caribbean island of Barbados. Recent studies have indicated that the virus must have already been circulating in local mosquito populations in Brazil for almost 2 years before it was identified by the World Health Organization in 2015. Metagenomic detection assays have the potential to detect emerging pathogens without prior knowledge of their genomic nucleic acid sequence. Yet their applicability as vector surveillance tools has been widely limited by the complexity of DNA populations from field-collected mosquito preparations. The aim of this study was to investigate local vector biology and characterize metagenomic arbovirus diversity in Aedes mosquitoes during the ongoing 2015/2016 ZIKV epidemic. METHODS: We performed a short-term vector screening study on the island of Barbados during the ongoing 2015/2016 ZIKV epidemic, where we sampled local Aedes mosquitoes. We reanalyzed mosquito viral microbiome data derived from standard Illumina MiSeq sequencing to detect arbovirus sequences. Additionally, we employed deep sequencing techniques (Illumina HiSeq) and designed a novel bait capture enrichment assay to increase sequencing efficiency for arbovirus sequences from complex DNA samples. RESULTS: We found that Aedes aegypti seemed to be the most likely vector of ZIKV, although it prevailed at a low density during the observed time period. The number of detected viruses increased with sequencing depth. Arbovirus sequence enrichment of metagenomic DNA preparations allowed the detection of arbovirus sequences of two different ZIKV genotypes, including a novel one. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the S3116W mutation in the NS5 gene region of ZIKV polyprotein. CONCLUSIONS: The metagenomic arbovirus detection approach presented here may serve as a useful tool for the identification of epidemic-causing arboviruses with the additional benefit of enabling the collection of phylogenetic information on the source. Apart from detecting more than 88 viruses using this approach, we also found evidence of novel ZIKV variants circulating in the local mosquito population during the observed time period.
BACKGROUND: The Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic of 2015/2016 spread throughout numerous countries. It emerged in mainland Latin America and spread to neighboring islands, including the Caribbean island of Barbados. Recent studies have indicated that the virus must have already been circulating in local mosquito populations in Brazil for almost 2 years before it was identified by the World Health Organization in 2015. Metagenomic detection assays have the potential to detect emerging pathogens without prior knowledge of their genomic nucleic acid sequence. Yet their applicability as vector surveillance tools has been widely limited by the complexity of DNA populations from field-collected mosquito preparations. The aim of this study was to investigate local vector biology and characterize metagenomic arbovirus diversity in Aedes mosquitoes during the ongoing 2015/2016 ZIKV epidemic. METHODS: We performed a short-term vector screening study on the island of Barbados during the ongoing 2015/2016 ZIKV epidemic, where we sampled local Aedes mosquitoes. We reanalyzed mosquito viral microbiome data derived from standard Illumina MiSeq sequencing to detect arbovirus sequences. Additionally, we employed deep sequencing techniques (Illumina HiSeq) and designed a novel bait capture enrichment assay to increase sequencing efficiency for arbovirus sequences from complex DNA samples. RESULTS: We found that Aedes aegypti seemed to be the most likely vector of ZIKV, although it prevailed at a low density during the observed time period. The number of detected viruses increased with sequencing depth. Arbovirus sequence enrichment of metagenomic DNA preparations allowed the detection of arbovirus sequences of two different ZIKV genotypes, including a novel one. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the S3116W mutation in the NS5 gene region of ZIKV polyprotein. CONCLUSIONS: The metagenomic arbovirus detection approach presented here may serve as a useful tool for the identification of epidemic-causing arboviruses with the additional benefit of enabling the collection of phylogenetic information on the source. Apart from detecting more than 88 viruses using this approach, we also found evidence of novel ZIKV variants circulating in the local mosquito population during the observed time period.
Authors: Erin H Graf; Keith E Simmon; Keith D Tardif; Weston Hymas; Steven Flygare; Karen Eilbeck; Mark Yandell; Robert Schlaberg Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Michael R Wilson; Samia N Naccache; Erik Samayoa; Mark Biagtan; Hiba Bashir; Guixia Yu; Shahriar M Salamat; Sneha Somasekar; Scot Federman; Steve Miller; Robert Sokolic; Elizabeth Garabedian; Fabio Candotti; Rebecca H Buckley; Kurt D Reed; Teresa L Meyer; Christine M Seroogy; Renee Galloway; Sheryl L Henderson; James E Gern; Joseph L DeRisi; Charles Y Chiu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yanjiao Zhou; Kristine M Wylie; Rana E El Feghaly; Kathie A Mihindukulasuriya; Alexis Elward; David B Haslam; Gregory A Storch; George M Weinstock Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Mary Kay Kindhauser; Tomas Allen; Veronika Frank; Ravi Shankar Santhana; Christopher Dye Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Nuno Rodrigues Faria; Raimunda do Socorro da Silva Azevedo; Oliver G Pybus; Marcio R T Nunes; Pedro F C Vasconcelos; Moritz U G Kraemer; Renato Souza; Mariana Sequetin Cunha; Sarah C Hill; Julien Thézé; Michael B Bonsall; Thomas A Bowden; Ilona Rissanen; Iray Maria Rocco; Juliana Silva Nogueira; Adriana Yurika Maeda; Fernanda Giseli da Silva Vasami; Fernando Luiz de Lima Macedo; Akemi Suzuki; Sueli Guerreiro Rodrigues; Ana Cecilia Ribeiro Cruz; Bruno Tardeli Nunes; Daniele Barbosa de Almeida Medeiros; Daniela Sueli Guerreiro Rodrigues; Alice Louize Nunes Queiroz; Eliana Vieira Pinto da Silva; Daniele Freitas Henriques; Elisabeth Salbe Travassos da Rosa; Consuelo Silva de Oliveira; Livia Caricio Martins; Helena Baldez Vasconcelos; Livia Medeiros Neves Casseb; Darlene de Brito Simith; Jane P Messina; Leandro Abade; José Lourenço; Luiz Carlos Junior Alcantara; Maricélia Maia de Lima; Marta Giovanetti; Simon I Hay; Rodrigo Santos de Oliveira; Poliana da Silva Lemos; Layanna Freitas de Oliveira; Clayton Pereira Silva de Lima; Sandro Patroca da Silva; Janaina Mota de Vasconcelos; Luciano Franco; Jedson Ferreira Cardoso; João Lídio da Silva Gonçalves Vianez-Júnior; Daiana Mir; Gonzalo Bello; Edson Delatorre; Kamran Khan; Marisa Creatore; Giovanini Evelim Coelho; Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira; Robert Tesh Journal: Science Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sadie J Ryan; Catherine A Lippi; Colin J Carlson; Anna M Stewart-Ibarra; Mercy J Borbor-Cordova; Moory Romero; Shelly-Ann Cox; Roché Mahon; Adrian Trotman; Leslie Rollock; Marquita Gittens-St Hilaire; Desmond King; Steven Daniel Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Christina Yek; Andrea R Pacheco; Manu Vanaerschot; Jennifer A Bohl; Elizabeth Fahsbender; Andrés Aranda-Díaz; Sreyngim Lay; Sophana Chea; Meng Heng Oum; Chanthap Lon; Cristina M Tato; Jessica E Manning Journal: Front Epidemiol Date: 2022-08-15
Authors: Oscar D Kirstein; Guadalupe Ayora Talavera; Zhuoran Wei; Karina J Ciau-Carrilo; Edgar Koyoc-Cardeña; Henry Puerta-Guardo; Ester Rodríguez-Martín; Anuar Medina-Barreiro; Azael Che Mendoza; Anne L Piantadosi; Pablo Manrique-Saide; Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Sofia G Seabra; Pieter J K Libin; Kristof Theys; Anna Zhukova; Barney I Potter; Hanna Nebenzahl-Guimaraes; Alexander E Gorbalenya; Igor A Sidorov; Victor Pimentel; Marta Pingarilho; Ana T R de Vasconcelos; Simon Dellicour; Ricardo Khouri; Olivier Gascuel; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Guy Baele; Lize Cuypers; Ana B Abecasis Journal: Virus Evol Date: 2022-03-29
Authors: Konstantinos Konstantinidis; Maria Bampali; Michael de Courcy Williams; Nikolas Dovrolis; Elisavet Gatzidou; Pavlos Papazilakis; Andreas Nearchou; Stavroula Veletza; Ioannis Karakasiliotis Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 5.640