Literature DB >> 3418084

Intraesophageal pH monitoring after breakfast + lunch in gastroesophageal reflux.

L Grande1, A Pujol, E Ros, J C Garcia-Valdecasas, J Fuster, J Visa, C Pera.   

Abstract

To evaluate intraesophageal pH monitoring during two consecutive 3-h postprandial periods (breakfast + lunch) in the diagnosis of pathological gastroesophageal reflux, we studied 40 patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux and 15 healthy controls. Reflux events were analyzed in the two separate postprandial periods, their sum (double postprandial pHmetry), and a standard 24-h period. Data from all pH-recording periods were compared and correlation coefficients were obtained between postprandial and 24-h reflux events. While pH recordings from the two separate postprandial periods provided good separation between patients and controls, double postprandial pHmetry was most accurate in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. In the latter procedure, mean percent reflux time was 2.5 +/- 1.8% in controls and 19.4% +/- 10.3% in patients (p less than 0.001), with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 97%. A high degree of correlation existed for all reflux events between postprandial and 24-h pHmetries. We believe that double postprandial intraesophageal pH monitoring accurately distinguishes between normal persons and patients with pathological reflux. The technique considerably shortens the examination time in relation to 24-h pH monitoring and may prove the esophageal test of choice for objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3418084     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-198808000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  8 in total

1.  Ingestion of acidic foods mimics gastroesophageal reflux during pH monitoring.

Authors:  Amit Agrawal; Radu Tutuian; Amine Hila; Janice Freeman; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Prolonged intraesophageal pH monitoring with 16-hr overnight recording. Comparison with "24-hr" analysis.

Authors:  R Dobhan; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Lack of effect of metoclopramide and domperidone on esophageal peristalsis and esophageal acid clearance in reflux esophagitis. A randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  L Grande; G Lacima; E Ros; J C García-Valdecasas; J Fuster; J Visa; C Pera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Inclusion of supine period in short-duration pH monitoring is essential in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R K Dhiman; V A Saraswat; A Mishra; S R Naik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: technique, interpretations, and clinical indications.

Authors:  Radha K Dhiman; Vivek A Saraswat; Subhash R Naik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Exclusion of meal periods from ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring may improve diagnosis of esophageal acid reflux.

Authors:  J M Wo; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring systems in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Grande; P Culell; E Ros; G Lacima; A Pujol; J C García-Valdecasas; J Fuster; J Visa; C Pera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Reflux patterns and related oesophageal motor activity in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  S Kruse-Andersen; L Wallin; T Madsen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 23.059

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.