Literature DB >> 8425433

Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring systems in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

L Grande1, P Culell, E Ros, G Lacima, A Pujol, J C García-Valdecasas, J Fuster, J Visa, C Pera.   

Abstract

Twenty-four-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring is presently considered the most reliable diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux. Prolonged esophageal pH measurements can be obtained in hospitalized patients with a stationary technique and in ambulant outpatients by means of a portable device; however, there have been no studies that have examined whether the two approaches provide a similar diagnostic accuracy. We performed a prospective study to compare stationary and ambulatory pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Seventy-seven control subjects and 178 patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized to either ambulant or static pH-metry, which was performed with standard pH electrodes, sensors, and recorders. Reflux events (intraesophageal pH < 4.0) analyzed were: number of episodes; total, upright, and supine reflux time; number of episodes lasting > 5 min; and duration of the longest episode. A composite score of all reflux events according to DeMeester was also calculated. The limits of normality were defined as the 95th percentiles of the control groups. Both controls and patients assigned to either pH monitoring method were comparable. Of 255 studies attempted, 243 (95%) were completed successfully. The results showed similar median values of reflux events for the two control groups and for the two patients groups. Percent total reflux time provided a good separation between normal and abnormal reflux, with a sensitivity of 0.92 for static pH-metry and 0.68 for the ambulant procedure (respective 95th percentiles, 3.4 and 4.6).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8425433     DOI: 10.1007/bf01307537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  16 in total

1.  The evaluation of objective measurements of gastroesophageal reflux and their contribution to patient management.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L F Johnson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Validation of an ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring system.

Authors:  M L Allen; W C Orr; D M Woodruff; M G Robinson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring recording systems.

Authors:  J L Herrera; J K Simpson; C L Maydonovitch; R K Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis.

Authors:  A J Smout; M Breedijk; C van der Zouw; L M Akkermans
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R Demeester
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations.

Authors:  C Emde; A Garner; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH-monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Johnsson; B Joelsson; P E Isberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Dysphagia and esophageal motor dysfunction in gastroesophageal reflux are corrected by fundoplication.

Authors:  L Grande; G Lacima; E Ros; A Pujol; J C Garcia-Valdecasas; J Fuster; J Visa; C Pera
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.062

9.  Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Utility of inpatient 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  A Pujol; L Grande; E Ros; C Pera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities.

Authors:  R Fass; R Hell; R E Sampliner; G Pulliam; E Graver; V Hartz; C Johnson; P Jaffe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Long-term control of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms after laparoscopic Nissen-Rosetti fundoplication.

Authors:  Oscar Vidal; Antonio Maria Lacy; Manuel Pera; Mauro Valentini; Jesus Bollo; Gloria Lacima; Luis Grande
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Chest pain at rest in patients with coronary artery disease. Myocardial ischemia, esophageal dysfunction, or panic disorder?

Authors:  E Ros; X Armengol; L Grande; V Toledo-Pimentel; G Lacima; G Sanz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  High amplitude contractions in the middle third of the oesophagus: a manometric marker of chronic alcoholism?

Authors:  L Grande; R Monforte; E Ros; V Toledo-Pimentel; R Estruch; G Lacima; A Urbano-Marquez; C Pera
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six year follow up of 107 patients.

Authors:  E Kuster; E Ros; V Toledo-Pimentel; A Pujol; J M Bordas; L Grande; C Pera
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Utility of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH and motility monitoring in noncardiac chest pain: report of 90 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Gloria Lacima; Luis Grande; Manuel Pera; Antonio Francino; Emilio Ros
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.