Literature DB >> 1587190

Prolonged intraesophageal pH monitoring with 16-hr overnight recording. Comparison with "24-hr" analysis.

R Dobhan1, D O Castell.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: From studies in 43 patients (17 male, 26 female, mean age 51 years), we compared the analysis of the routine complete "24-hr" ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring study to that of the 16-hr overnight interval (4:00 PM to 8:00 AM). The latter included a major meal with an upright postprandial period and a recumbent period. All patients were monitored for at least 20 hr (median = 22.6 hr). The percent distal esophageal pH less than 4.0 and number of reflux episodes were measured for the total, upright, and recumbent periods of both the 16-hr and "24-hr" monitoring times. Significant (P less than 0.001) positive correlations were found for all comparisons between the two monitoring periods including percent time of pH less than 4.0 (total: r = 0.98; upright: r = 0.96) and number of episodes (totals r = 0.97; upright: r = 0.93). Patients were separated into normal and abnormal refluxers based on results of "24-hr" monitoring (pH below 4.0 greater than 4.2% total time; greater than 6.0% upright; greater than 1.2% recumbent). Based on this, sensitivity and specificity for 16-hr monitoring were as follows: total study: 86% and 95%; upright: 80% and 91%; recumbent: 100% for both.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) a 16-hr overnight pH monitoring period can provide a reliable representation of "24-hr" distal esophageal acid exposure, (2) this shorter monitoring may improve patient acceptability and compliance, and (3) the symptom index was changed in 26.3% of patients using the 16-hr evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1587190     DOI: 10.1007/bf01300383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  27 in total

1.  Postprandial gastro-oesophageal reflux in healthy people.

Authors:  M D Kaye
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Comparison of three methods of intraesophageal pH recordings in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  G Bianchi Porro; F Pace
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Physiological gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motor activity studied with a new system for 24-hour recording and automated analysis.

Authors:  A J Smout; M Breedijk; C van der Zouw; L M Akkermans
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Prolonged pH recording in the study of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  J Spencer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Is 24 h ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring useful in a district general hospital?

Authors:  I P Donald; G A Ford; S P Wilkinson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J E Richter; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux in health and disease.

Authors:  T R Demeester; L F Johnson; G J Joseph; M S Toscano; A W Hall; D B Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Daytime gastro-oesophageal reflux is important in oesophagitis.

Authors:  J S de Caestecker; J N Blackwell; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Utility of inpatient 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  A Pujol; L Grande; E Ros; C Pera
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  The symptom sensitivity index: a valuable additional parameter in 24-hour esophageal pH recording.

Authors:  R Breumelhof; A J Smout
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ingestion of acidic foods mimics gastroesophageal reflux during pH monitoring.

Authors:  Amit Agrawal; Radu Tutuian; Amine Hila; Janice Freeman; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  BSPGHAN Motility Working Group position statement: paediatric multichannel intraluminal pH impedance monitoring-indications, methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Mohamed Mutalib; David Rawat; Keith Lindley; Osvaldo Borrelli; Steve Perring; Marcus K H Auth; Nikhil Thapar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-15

3.  Streamlining 24-hour pH study for GERD: Use of a 3-hour postprandial test.

Authors:  Amindra S Arora; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Equine model of inducing ulceration in alimentary squamous epithelial mucosa.

Authors:  M J Murray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Reflux monitoring: current status.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06

6.  Manometric Subtypes of Ineffective Esophageal Motility.

Authors:  Mirjam Hiestand; Ala' Abdel Jalil; Donald O Castell
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.488

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.