Literature DB >> 29367324

Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices.

Iain Chalmers1,2, Andrew D Oxman1, Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren1, Selena Ryan-Vig3, Sarah Pannell4, Nelson Sewankambo1,5, Daniel Semakula1,5, Allen Nsangi1,5, Loai Albarqouni6, Paul Glasziou6, Kamal Mahtani4, David Nunan4, Carl Heneghan4, Douglas Badenoch2.   

Abstract

Many claims about the effects of treatments, though well intentioned, are wrong. Indeed, they are sometimes deliberately misleading to serve interests other than the well-being of patients and the public. People need to know how to spot unreliable treatment claims so that they can protect themselves and others from harm. The ability to assess the trustworthiness of treatment claims is often lacking. Acquiring this ability depends on being familiar with, and correctly applying, some key concepts, for example, that' association is not the same as causation.' The Informed Health Choices (IHC) Project has identified 36 such concepts and shown that people can be taught to use them in decision making. A randomised trial in Uganda, for example, showed that primary school children with poor reading skills could be taught to apply 12 of the IHC Key Concepts. The list of IHC Key Concepts has proven to be effective in providing a framework for developing and evaluating IHC resources to help children to think critically about treatment claims. The list also provides a framework for retrieving, coding and organising other teaching and learning materials for learners of any age. It should help teachers, researchers, clinicians, and patients to structure critical thinking about the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inferences; concepts; critical appraisal; critical thinking; epistemology; treatment claims

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29367324     DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med        ISSN: 2515-446X


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Laura Martínez García
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-03-05

2.  Quality of information in news media reports about the effects of health interventions: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Matt Oxman; Lillebeth Larun; Giordano Pérez Gaxiola; Dima Alsaid; Anila Qasim; Christopher James Rose; Karin Bischoff; Andrew David Oxman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-06-01

3. 

Authors:  Viola Antao; Roland Grad; Guylène Thériault; James A Dickinson; Olga Szafran; Harminder Singh; Raphael Rezkallah; Earle Waugh; Neil R Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.025

4.  Going against the status quo in screening: Call to action to improve teaching in preventive health care.

Authors:  Viola Antao; Roland Grad; Guylène Thériault; James A Dickinson; Olga Szafran; Harminder Singh; Raphael Rezkallah; Earle Waugh; Neil R Bell
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.025

5.  Battling the COVID-19 infodemic in an Irish context: the role of iHealthFacts.

Authors:  Marina Zaki; Declan Devane; Thomas Conway; Sandra Galvin; Nikita Burke; Elaine Finucane
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2020-11-09

6.  Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices.

Authors:  Andrew David Oxman; Iain Chalmers; Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-11-12

7.  The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Patricia Atkinson; Douglas Badenoch; Paul Glasziou; Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Andy Oxman; Mike Clarke
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  Who can you trust? A review of free online sources of "trustworthy" information about treatment effects for patients and the public.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Elizabeth J Paulsen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  The systematic use of evidence-based methodologies and technologies enhances shared decision-making in the 2018 International Consensus Conference on Patient Blood Management.

Authors:  Hans Van Remoortel; Kari Aranko; Markus M Mueller; Emmy De Buck; Dana Devine; Gilles Folléa; Patrick Meybohm; Pierre Tiberghien; Erica M Wood; Philippe Vandekerckhove; Erhard Seifried
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.144

10.  Ethical considerations in the care of encephalopathic neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Authors:  Monica E Lemmon; Courtney J Wusthoff; Renee D Boss; Lisa Anne Rasmussen
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.726

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.