| Literature DB >> 34176501 |
Zhennan Jiang1, Zhiyong Cui1, Ziwei Zhu1, Yinghang Liu1, Ya-Jie Tang1, Jin Hou2, Qingsheng Qi3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Succinic acid (SA) is a crucial metabolic intermediate and platform chemical. Development of biobased processes to achieve sustainable SA production has attracted more and more attention in biotechnology industry. Yarrowia lipolytica has a strong tricarboxylic acid cycle and tolerates low pH conditions, thus making it a potential platform for SA production. However, its SA titers in glucose media remain low.Entities:
Keywords: Glucose fermentation; Succinic acid; Transporter engineering; Yarrowia lipolytica
Year: 2021 PMID: 34176501 PMCID: PMC8237505 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-01996-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the SA biosynthetic pathways and its export route in Y. lipolytica. There are three major metabolic pathways involve in the SA biosynthesis of Y. lipolytica: (1) reductive branch of the TCA cycle (red line); (2) oxidative TCA cycle (green line); (3) glyoxylate bypass (blue line). Dotted lines indicated the deleted genes for SA accumulation. Pck phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, Scs2 succinyl-CoA synthase β subunit, Frd fumarate reductase, Mls malate synthase, Icl isocitrate lyase, Yhm2 mitochondrial citrate transporter
Expression of the mitochondrial carboxylic acid transporters in Y. lipolytica
| RefSeq | Putative coding product | Strain name | DCW (g/L) | SA titer (g/L) | SA yield (g/g glucose) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YALI0F26323g | Mitochondrial citrate transporter | PGC62-YlCtp1 | 9.5 ± 0.16 | 20.8 ± 0.15 | 0.57 ± 0.04 |
| YALI0F20966g | Mitochondrial tricarboxylate transporter | PGC62-YlCtp2 | 9.8 ± 0.61 | 20.5 ± 0.25 | 0.53 ± 0.01 |
| YALI0B03344g | Mitochondrial dicarboxylate transporter | PGC62-YlDic | 9.0 ± 0.04 | 23.6 ± 3.50 | 0.62 ± 0.12 |
| YALI0D02629g | Mitochondrial 2-oxodicarboxylate carrier | PGC62-YlOdc | 9.4 ± 0.21 | 21.9 ± 2.05 | 0.52 ± 0.05 |
| YALI0E34672g | Mitochondrial succinate-fumarate transporter | PGC62-YlAcr | 8.3 ± 1.35 | 22.2 ± 0.6 | 0.59 ± 0.01 |
| N/A | N/A | PGC62 | 8.3 ± 0.02 | 18.3 ± 0.39 | 0.57 ± 0.03 |
Fig. 2Effect of overexpression and suppression of YlDic1 gene on the cell growth and SA production of Y. lipolytica PGC62 strain. PGC62-YlDic was derived from PGC62 strain with overexpressed YlDic1 gene. PGC62-YlDici was derived from PGC62 strain with down-regulated YlDic1 gene through CRISPRi method. Error bars show the SDs of 3 biological replicates
Fig. 3Overexpression of C4-dicarboxylic acid transporters from different species to improve the SA production of Y. lipolytica. a Nine potential C4-dicarboxylic acid transporters were selected according to the phylogenetic tree; b effect of the different C4-dicarboxylic acid transporters on the SA production of Y. lipolytica. Error bars show the SDs of 3 biological replicates
Fig. 4Construction of the Y. lipolytica chassis cell through optimizing SA biosynthetic pathways. a Effect of the different genetic modifications on SA production of Y. lipolytica. To enhance the metabolic flux of reductive TCA, oxidative TCA and glyoxylate pathway, the expression cassettes of TbFrd, YlScs2 and YlYhm2-YlMls-YlIcl were overexpressed in PGC62 strain, respectively; b fermentation profile of the engineered strain PGC62-SYF with optimized SA biosynthetic pathway in shaking flasks. Error bars show the SDs of 3 biological replicates
Fig. 5Comparison of the fermentation profiles between different SA producing Y. lipolytica strains. a Differences in SA production performance of different engineered strains. b Differences in the cell growth of different engineered strains. Error bars show the SDs of 3 biological replicates
Fig. 6Optimization of culture conditions for SA over-production in 1 L bioreactor. a Comparison of the SA production performance between different Y. lipolytica engineered strains; b growth curves of different Y. lipolytica engineered strains; c effect of the pH values on the SA production of PGC62-SYF-Mae strain; d effect of the air flows and stirring rates on the SA production of PGC62-SYF-Mae strain. Error bars show the SDs of 3 technical replicates
Fig. 7Kinetics of cell growth, glucose consumption and SA production during fed-batch culture of Y. lipolytica engineered strain PGC62-SYF-Mae in bioreactor. Error bars show the SDs of 3 biological replicates
Comparison of SA production by yeasts with glucose as sole carbon source
| Strain | Fermentation condition | SA titer (g/L) | SA yield (g/g glucose) | SA productivity (g/L/h) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dual phase fed-batch, synthetic medium, pH 5.0 to pH 3.0 | 43.0 | N/A | 0.45 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, synthetic medium, pH 3.8 | 12.97 | 0.14 | 0.11 | [ | |
| Batch, synthetic medium, pH 3.0 | 48.2 | 0.45 | 0.97 | [ | |
| Batch, YPD medium, pH 5.0 | 7.7 | 0.08 | N/A | [ | |
| Batch, synthetic medium, neutralization by CaCO3 | 11.6 | 0.12 | 0.11 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, synthetic medium, without pH control | 50.2 | 0.43 | 0.93 | [ | |
| Repeated-batch, synthetic medium, without pH control | 55.3 | 0.34 | 1.15 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, YPD medium, pH 6.0 | 65.7 | 0.50 | 0.68 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, YPD medium, without pH control | 76.8 | 0.20 | 0.24 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, YPD medium, without pH control | 71.6 | N/A | 0.4 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, YPD medium, without pH control | 53.6 | 0.61 | 0.49 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, YPD medium, pH 5.0 | 35.3 | 0.26 | 0.61 | [ | |
| Feb-batch, YPD medium, pH 5.5 | 101.4 | 0.37 | 0.70 | This study |