| Literature DB >> 34176075 |
Claudio Imperatori1, Angelo Panno1, Giuseppe Alessio Carbone1, Ornella Corazza2,3, Ines Taddei4, Laura Bernabei4,5, Chiara Massullo1, Elisabeth Prevete4, Lorenzo Tarsitani4, Massimo Pasquini4, Benedetto Farina1, Massimo Biondi4, Francesco Saverio Bersani6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although the association between problematic use of the internet and eating disorders (EDs) in young adults has been previously established, its underlying mechanisms have not been completely clarified. It has been suggested that exposure to idealized very thin and toned body images (e.g., "thinspiration" and "fitspiration" trends) on social media might lead to increased feelings of body dissatisfaction which, in turn, can represent a trigger for EDs. We have tested this hypothesis in a sample (N = 721) of young adults (504 females, mean age: 24.13 ± 3.70 years; range 18-34).Entities:
Keywords: Eating disorders; Muscle dysmorphia; Psychopathology; Social media addiction; Substances use
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34176075 PMCID: PMC8235906 DOI: 10.1007/s40519-021-01232-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eat Weight Disord ISSN: 1124-4909 Impact factor: 4.652
Descriptive statistics for the sample (N = 721)
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Age, M ± SD | 24.13 ± 3.70 |
| Females, | 504 (69.9) |
| Occupation | |
| Employed, | 195 (27.1) |
| Unemployed, | 47 (6.5) |
| Students, | 479 (66.4) |
| Married or living with partner, | 84 (11.7) |
| Educational level > 13 years, | 316 (43.8) |
| Tobacco use in the last 12 months, | 311 (43.1) |
| Substance use in the last 12 months*, | 161 (22.3) |
| CAGE total score, M ± SD | 0.45 ± 0.86 |
| CAGE ≥ 2, | 94 (13.0) |
| Self-reported BMI, M ± SD | 22.10 ± 3.28 |
| BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, | 77 (10.7) |
| BMI between 18.50 and 24.99 kg/m2, | 534 (74.1) |
| BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2, | 95 (13.2) |
| BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, | 15 (2.1) |
| BSMAS total score, M ± SD | 14.21 ± 5.47 |
| BSMAS ≥ 19, | 154 (21.4) |
| EAT-26 total score, M ± SD | 10.08 ± 12.93 |
| EAT-26 ≥ 20, | 120 (16.6) |
| MDDI total score, M ± SD | 23.33 ± 7.65 |
| MDDI > 39, | 26 (3.6) |
| BSI-GSI, M ± SD | 0.97 ± 0.70 |
| BSI cut-off**, | 170 (23.6) |
M mean, SD standard deviation, CAGE Cut-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye (CAGE) questionnaire, BMI body mass index, BSMAS Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, MDDI Muscle Dysmorphic Disorder Inventory, EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test-26, BSI-GSI Brief Symptom Inventory-Global severity Index
*Number of individual who reported that the most relevantly use psychoactive substance in the previous years was one of the following: cannabis, cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens, amphetamines, tranquillizers, other substances different from alcohol, nicotine and caffeine
**63 T score on the GSI or in two primary BSI dimensions
Values of Spearman’s ρ correlation coefficient among variables in all samples (N = 721)
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. BSMAS total score | – | ||||||
| 2. MDDI total score | 0.138*** | – | |||||
| 3. EAT-26 total score | 0.179*** | 0.459*** | – | ||||
| 4. BSI-GSI | 0.430*** | 0.354*** | 0.382*** | – | |||
| 5. CAGE total score | 0.105** | 0.220*** | 0.180*** | 0.205*** | – | ||
| 6. Age | − 0.163*** | − 0.068 | − 0.090* | − 0.145*** | − 0.023 | – | |
| 7. Self-reported BMI | − 0.164*** | 0.048 | − 0.011 | − 0.116** | 0.028 | 0.165*** | – |
Significant correlations are indicated by asterisk (*)
BSMAS Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, MDDI Muscle Dysmorphic Disorder Inventory, EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test-26, BSI-GSI Brief Symptom Inventory-Global severity Index, BMI body mass index, CAGE Cut-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye (CAGE) questionnaire
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Differences between participants with and without problematic social media use according BSMAS ≥ 19
| Variables | PSMU− | PSMU+ | Test | Effect size, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younger (18–24) young adults, | 335 (59.1%) | 106 (68.8%) | 0.082 | ||
| Age, M ± SD | 24.33 ± 3.75 | 23.40 ± 3.42 | 0.104 | ||
| Females, | 382 (67.4%) | 122 (79.2%) | 0.106 | ||
| Students, | 365 (64.4%) | 114 (74.0%) | 0.084 | ||
| Employed, | 166 (29.3%) | 29 (18.8%) | 0.096 | ||
| Educational level > 13 years, | 261 (46.0%) | 55 (35.7%) | 0.085 | ||
| BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, | 53 (9.3%) | 24 (15.6%) | 0.070 | 0.172 | |
| BMI between 18.50 and 24.99 kg/m2, | 422 (74.4%) | 112 (72.7%) | |||
| BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2, | 78 (13.8%) | 17 (11.0%) | |||
| BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, | 14 (2.5%) | 1 (0.6%) | |||
| BMI, M ± SD | 22.30 ± 3.30 | 21.39 ± 3.13 | < | 0.121 | |
| Married or living with partner, | 71 (12.5%) | 13 (8.4%) | 0.162 | 0.052 | |
| Tobacco use (last 12 months), | 253 (44.6%) | 58 (37.7%) | 0.122 | 0.058 | |
| Substances use (last 12 months), | 135 (22.8%) | 26 (16.9%) | 0.067 | 0.068 | |
| CAGE ≥ 2, | 70 (12.3%) | 24 (15.6%) | 0.290 | 0.039 | |
| CAGE total, M ± SD | 0.42 ± 0.82 | 0.58 ± 0.99 | 0.053 | 0.056 | |
| EAT-26 ≥ 20, | 81 (14.3%) | 39 (25.3%) | 0.121 | ||
| EAT-26 total score, M ± SD | 9.15 ± 12.23 | 13.49 ± 14.77 | 0.114 | ||
| MDDI > 39, | 18 (3.2%) | 8 (5.2%) | 0.233 | 0.044 | |
| MDDI total score, M ± SD | 22.92 ± 7.47 | 24.84 ± 8.13 | 0.098 | ||
| BSI cut-off, | 99 (17.5%) | 71 (46.1%) | < | 0.277 | |
| BSI-GSI, M ± SD | 0.84 ± 0.63 | 1.45 ± 0.71 | < | 0.354 |
Bold values represent p < 0.05
Original, BSMAS Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, PSMU problematic social media use, CAGE Cut-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye (CAGE) questionnaire, MDDI Muscle Dysmorphic Disorder Inventory, EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test-26, BSI-GSI Brief Symptom Inventory-Global severity Index
Results of the mediation models
| Muscle dysmorphia severity | Eating disorder-related symptoms | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 (path | Model 2 (path | Model 3 (path | |||||||
| SE | 95% CI | SE | 95% CI | SE | 95% CI | ||||
| BSMAS total score | 0.052 | [0.033; 0.239] | 0.130 | 0.088 | [− 0.042; 0.301] | 0.093 | [0.031; 0.395] | ||
| MDDI total score | – | – | – | 0.063 | [0.488; 0.733] | – | – | – | |
| Age | − 0.025 | 0.099 | [− 0.219; 0.169] | − 0.056 | 0.164 | [− 0.379; 0.266] | − 0.072 | 0.175 | [− 0.415; 0.271] |
| Gender | 0.612 | [− 5.354; − 2.950] | 1.050 | [1.926; 6.049] | 1.453 | 1.083 | [− 0.674; 3.579] | ||
| Student | 1.620 | 1.100 | [− 0.539; 3.778] | − 0.664 | 1.831 | [− 4.258; 2.930] | 0.325 | 1.946 | [− 3.496; 4.145] |
| Employed | 0.852 | 1.162 | [− 1.429; 3.132] | − 0.918 | 1.931 | [− 4.710; 2.874] | − 0.398 | 2.055 | [− 4.434; 3.637] |
| Educational level > 13 years | 1.102 | 0.604 | [− 0.084; 2.288] | 0.051 | 1.006 | [− 1.924; 2.027] | 0.724 | 1.069 | [− 1.374; 2.823] |
| Marital status | − 0.528 | 0.851 | [− 2.198; 1.143] | 0.385 | 1.414 | [− 2.391; 3.162] | 0.063 | 1.505 | [− 2.892; 3.019] |
| Self-reported BMI | − 0.010 | 0.084 | [− 0.176; 0.155] | 0.076 | 0.140 | [− 0.199; 0.352] | 0.070 | 0.149 | [− 0.223; 0.363] |
| Tobacco use | 0.387 | 0.539 | [− 0.671; 1.444] | 0.187 | 0.896 | [− 1.571; 1.945] | 0.423 | 0.953 | [− 1.448; 2.294] |
| CAGE ≥ 2 | 0.800 | [0.945; 4.085] | 1.495 | 1.339 | [− 1.133; 4.123] | 1.415 | [0.252; 5.809] | ||
| Substances use | 0.683 | [0.885; 3.568] | 0.454 | 1.144 | [− 1.792; 2.700] | 1.813 | 1.209 | [− 0.561; 4.187] | |
| BSI cut-off | 0.664 | [3.720; 6.328] | 1.148 | [1.869; 6.375] | 1.175 | [4.882; 9.497] | |||
| Compilation modality | − 0.209 | 0.619 | [− 1.425; 1.006] | 1.456 | 1.029 | [− 0.565; 3.476] | 1.328 | 1.096 | [− 0.823; 3.479] |
Coding systems: gender: 1 = male 2 = female. Student: 0 = no 1 = yes. Employed: 0 = no 1 = yes. Educational level > 13 years: 0 = no 1 = yes. Marital status: 1 = unmarried 2 = married or living with partner. Tobacco use = 0 = no 1 = yes. CAGE ≥ 2: 0 = no 1 = yes. Illicit drug use: 0 = no 1 = yes. BSI cut-off: 0 = no 1 = yes. Compilation modality: 1 = paper/pencil questionnaires 2 = online questionnaires
Bold values represent p < 0.05
Original, BSMAS Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, MDDI Muscle Dysmorphic Disorder Inventory, BMI body mass index, CAGE Cut-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye (CAGE) questionnaire, BSI Brief Symptom Inventory
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Fig. 1Graphical representation of the results from the mediation model. The reported estimates were obtained controlling for potentially competing factors (i.e., compilation modality, socio-demographic variables, tobacco use, problematic alcohol use, substances use, self-reported body mass index, and clinically relevant psychopathological distress). BSMAS The Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test, MDDI Muscle Dysmorphia Disorder Inventory