Literature DB >> 34173196

Challenges and Opportunities in Engaging Primary Care Providers in BRCA Testing: Results from the BFOR Study.

Lydia E Pace1,2, Nadine Tung3, Yeonsoo S Lee4, Jada G Hamilton5, Camila Gabriel6, Anna Revette6, Sahitya Raja7, Colby Jenkins6, Anthony Braswell8, Kelly Morgan5, Jeffrey Levin5, Jeremy Block5, Susan M Domchek9, Katherine Nathanson9, Heather Symecko9, Kelsey Spielman9, Beth Karlan8, Daniella Kamara8, Jenny Lester8, Kenneth Offit5, Judy E Garber6, Nancy L Keating10,11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Engaging primary care providers (PCPs) in BRCA1/2 testing and results disclosure would increase testing access. The BRCA Founder OutReach (BFOR) study is a prospective study of BRCA1/2 founder mutation screening among individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent that sought to involve participants' PCPs in results disclosure. We used quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate PCPs' perspectives, knowledge, and experience disclosing results in BFOR.
METHODS: Among PCPs nominated by BFOR participants to disclose BRCA1/2 results, we assessed the proportion agreeing to disclose. To examine PCP's perspectives, knowledge, and willingness to disclose results, we surveyed 501 nominated PCPs. To examine PCPs' experiences disclosing results in BFOR, we surveyed 101 PCPs and conducted 10 semi-structured interviews.
RESULTS: In the BFOR study overall, PCPs agreed to disclose their patient's results 40.5% of the time. Two hundred thirty-four PCPs (46.7%) responded to the initial survey. Responding PCPs were more likely to agree to disclose patients' results than non-responders (57.3% vs. 28.6%, p<0.001). Among all respondents, most felt very (19.7%) or somewhat (39.1%) qualified to share results. Among PCPs declining to disclose, insufficient knowledge was the most common reason. In multivariable logistic regression, feeling qualified was the only variable significantly associated with agreeing to disclose results (OR 6.53, 95% CI 3.31, 12.88). In post-disclosure surveys (response rate=55%), PCPs reported largely positive experiences. Interview findings suggested that although PCPs valued the study-provided educational materials, they desired better integration of results and decision support into workflows.
CONCLUSION: Barriers exist to incorporating BRCA1/2 testing into primary care. Most PCPs declined to disclose their patients' BFOR results, although survey respondents were motivated and had positive disclosure experiences. PCP training and integrated decision support could be beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03351803), November 24, 2017.
© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34173196      PMCID: PMC9198181          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06970-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  20 in total

1.  Physician use of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Louise Wideroff; Andrew N Freedman; Lorayn Olson; Carrie N Klabunde; William Davis; Kadaba P Srinath; Robert T Croyle; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Douglas K Owens; Karina W Davidson; Alex H Krist; Michael J Barry; Michael Cabana; Aaron B Caughey; Chyke A Doubeni; John W Epling; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Lori Pbert; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Cathelijne H van der Wouden; Deanna Alexis Carere; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee; Mack T Ruffin; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Amnon Lahad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.

Authors:  L Wideroff; S T Vadaparampil; M H Greene; S Taplin; L Olson; A N Freedman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  US physicians' attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  A N Freedman; L Wideroff; L Olson; W Davis; C Klabunde; K P Srinath; B B Reeve; R T Croyle; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based series of breast cancer cases. Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  BRCA Genetic Testing and Receipt of Preventive Interventions Among Women Aged 18-64 Years with Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Areas - United States, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Katherine Kolor; Zhuo Chen; Scott D Grosse; Juan L Rodriguez; Ridgely Fisk Green; W David Dotson; M Scott Bowen; Julie A Lynch; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2017-09-08

10.  Comparison of up-front cash cards and checks as incentives for participation in a clinician survey: a study within a trial.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Yeonsoo S Lee; Nadine Tung; Jada G Hamilton; Camila Gabriel; Sahitya C Raja; Colby Jenkins; Anthony Braswell; Susan M Domchek; Heather Symecko; Kelsey Spielman; Beth Y Karlan; Jenny Lester; Daniella Kamara; Jeffrey Levin; Kelly Morgan; Kenneth Offit; Judy Garber; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

1.  Targeted BRCA1/2 population screening among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals using a web-enabled medical model: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Kelly M Morgan; Jada G Hamilton; Heather Symecko; Daniella Kamara; Colby Jenkins; Jenny Lester; Kelsey Spielman; Lydia E Pace; Camila Gabriel; Jeffrey D Levin; Prince Rainier Tejada; Anthony Braswell; Vanessa Marcell; Temima Wildman; Bryan Devolder; Robin Camhi Baum; Jeremy N Block; Yuri Fesko; Kylin Boehler; Victoria Howell; Jacob Heitler; Mark E Robson; Katherine L Nathanson; Nadine Tung; Beth Y Karlan; Susan M Domchek; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.864

2.  Residential Locale Is Associated with Disparities in Genetic Testing-Related Outcomes Among BRCA1/2-Positive Women.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-02-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.