K Desbrosses1, M Schwartz1, J Theurel2. 1. Working Life Department, French National Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), 1 rue du Morvan, 54500, Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France. 2. Working Life Department, French National Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), 1 rue du Morvan, 54500, Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France. jean.theurel@inrs.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Overhead works (OHW) are identified as a major risk factor for shoulder musculoskeletal disorders. The use of upper-limb exoskeletons (EXOUL) is emerging to address these challenges. This research tested the influence of EXOUL design and load on the upper-limb and postural muscles activity, and on the balance control, during OHW. METHODS: This study compared two passive EXOUL, notably differing by the level of assistive torque delivered. Both EXOUL was examined in two load conditions (2 vs. 8 kg). Twenty-nine volunteers performed a static OHW for each condition. RESULTS: Both EXOUL led to similar reductions in shoulder flexor muscle activity (12.3 ± 7.8% of RMSREF), compared to without equipment (29.0 ± 14.2% RMSREF). Both EXOUL resulted in a reduction in the activity of shoulder (3.6 ± 3.2% RMSREF) and wrist (2.4 ± 1.7% RMSREF) extensor muscles (4.9 ± 3.9 and 5.9 ± 6.1% RMSREF, respectively). The use of EXOUL led to reductions in back muscle activity, depending on the exoskeleton design (in % RMSREF, 12.9 ± 9.4 for EXO1, 22.8 ± 12.6 for EXO2 and 32.0 ± 18.4 without equipment). Wearing EXOUL induced changes in balance regulation, depending on both exoskeleton design and load condition. CONCLUSION: The increase of assistive torque was not associated with an increase in EXOUL performance. However, the exoskeleton design (mass, balance, and assistive torque) has to be suitable for the load handled during static OHW to optimize the effects of using an EXOUL on the postural muscles.
PURPOSE: Overhead works (OHW) are identified as a major risk factor for shoulder musculoskeletal disorders. The use of upper-limb exoskeletons (EXOUL) is emerging to address these challenges. This research tested the influence of EXOUL design and load on the upper-limb and postural muscles activity, and on the balance control, during OHW. METHODS: This study compared two passive EXOUL, notably differing by the level of assistive torque delivered. Both EXOUL was examined in two load conditions (2 vs. 8 kg). Twenty-nine volunteers performed a static OHW for each condition. RESULTS: Both EXOUL led to similar reductions in shoulder flexor muscle activity (12.3 ± 7.8% of RMSREF), compared to without equipment (29.0 ± 14.2% RMSREF). Both EXOUL resulted in a reduction in the activity of shoulder (3.6 ± 3.2% RMSREF) and wrist (2.4 ± 1.7% RMSREF) extensor muscles (4.9 ± 3.9 and 5.9 ± 6.1% RMSREF, respectively). The use of EXOUL led to reductions in back muscle activity, depending on the exoskeleton design (in % RMSREF, 12.9 ± 9.4 for EXO1, 22.8 ± 12.6 for EXO2 and 32.0 ± 18.4 without equipment). Wearing EXOUL induced changes in balance regulation, depending on both exoskeleton design and load condition. CONCLUSION: The increase of assistive torque was not associated with an increase in EXOUL performance. However, the exoskeleton design (mass, balance, and assistive torque) has to be suitable for the load handled during static OHW to optimize the effects of using an EXOUL on the postural muscles.
Authors: Kirsten Huysamen; Tim Bosch; Michiel de Looze; Konrad S Stadler; Eveline Graf; Leonard W O'Sullivan Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Sunwook Kim; Maury A Nussbaum; Mohammad Iman Mokhlespour Esfahani; Mohammad Mehdi Alemi; Saad Alabdulkarim; Ehsan Rashedi Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Sunwook Kim; Maury A Nussbaum; Mohammad Iman Mokhlespour Esfahani; Mohammad Mehdi Alemi; Bochen Jia; Ehsan Rashedi Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Helena Miranda; Eira Viikari-Juntura; Sami Heistaro; Markku Heliövaara; Hilkka Riihimäki Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897