Literature DB >> 32310110

Ergonomics assessment of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in an automotive assembly plant.

Sofía Iranzo1, Alicia Piedrabuena2, Daniel Iordanov2, Ursula Martinez-Iranzo2, Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois3.   

Abstract

Over the years, the industry's interest in using external support devices, such as exoskeletons, is increasing. They are introduced as a new technique for improving the conditions of workers and for reducing the risk of musculoskeletal injuries. An investigation of muscle activity, Jonsson's (Jonsson, 1982) ergonomic acceptance ranges, and shoulder range of motion was conducted with a sample of 12 workers using an upper extremity exoskeleton in an automotive assembly line. The operators performed continuous cycles of dynamic overhead work consisting of the assembly of the car body at the underside of the car making use of pneumatic screwdrivers. The EMGs (anterior part of deltoid, trapezius, latissimus dorsi and erector spinae) were measured for the muscle activity analysis on the one hand, and for the ergonomics study on the other hand. The latter consisted of an approach based on Jonsson's work, that establishes acceptance thresholds of cumulative percentage of maximum voluntary contraction of muscle activity (%MVC) in a work cycle. The joint angles motion capture was carried out by measuring the angles of the neck, back, and arms joints. All measurements were performed during experimental sessions with and without an exoskeleton. The key findings show reductions of 34% and 18% of the deltoid and the trapezius muscular activities, respectively, which in turn could lead to a reduction of discomfort and fatigue. The erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscles were not significantly affected by exoskeleton. The values of muscular activity were also represented over Jonsson's acceptance areas. Referring to the posture, some differences were found in the range of movement of back, neck, and arms owing to the use of the exoskeleton; however, the differences were smaller than 5% in all cases.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automotive; EMG; Exoskeleton; Industry conditions; Motion-tracking; Upper-limb

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32310110     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review on Evaluation Strategies for Field Assessment of Upper-Body Industrial Exoskeletons: Current Practices and Future Trends.

Authors:  Pranav Madhav Kuber; Masoud Abdollahi; Mohammad Mehdi Alemi; Ehsan Rashedi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  Effects of Upper-Limb Exoskeletons Designed for Use in the Working Environment-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Tobias Moeller; Janina Krell-Roesch; Alexander Woll; Thorsten Stein
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Assessment of a Passive Lumbar Exoskeleton in Material Manual Handling Tasks under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Sofía Iranzo; Alicia Piedrabuena; Fernando García-Torres; Jose Luis Martinez-de-Juan; Gema Prats-Boluda; Mercedes Sanchis; Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  EMG Characterization and Processing in Production Engineering.

Authors:  Manuel Del Olmo; Rosario Domingo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Industrial Exoskeletons for Injury Prevention: Efficacy Evaluation Metrics, Target Tasks, and Supported Body Postures.

Authors:  Ali Golabchi; Andrew Chao; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Ergonomic Assessment of a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton through Electromyography and Anybody Modeling System.

Authors:  Yong-Ku Kong; Kyeong-Hee Choi; Min-Uk Cho; Seoung-Yoen Kim; Min-Jung Kim; Jin-Woo Shim; Sang-Soo Park; Kyung-Ran Kim; Min-Tae Seo; Hye-Seon Chae; Hyun-Ho Shim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Evaluation of two upper-limb exoskeletons during overhead work: influence of exoskeleton design and load on muscular adaptations and balance regulation.

Authors:  K Desbrosses; M Schwartz; J Theurel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Guidelines for Working Heights of the Lower-Limb Exoskeleton (CEX) Based on Ergonomic Evaluations.

Authors:  Yong-Ku Kong; Chae-Won Park; Min-Uk Cho; Seoung-Yeon Kim; Min-Jung Kim; Dong Jin Hyun; Kihyeon Bae; Jong Kyu Choi; Sang Min Ko; Kyeong-Hee Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Wearables for Biomechanical Performance Optimization and Risk Assessment in Industrial and Sports Applications.

Authors:  Sam McDevitt; Haley Hernandez; Jamison Hicks; Russell Lowell; Hamza Bentahaikt; Reuben Burch; John Ball; Harish Chander; Charles Freeman; Courtney Taylor; Brock Anderson
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.