| Literature DB >> 34165728 |
Ramón Iglesias-Rey1, Andres da Silva-Candal2, Manuel Rodríguez-Yáñez3, Ana Estany-Gestal4, Uxía Regueiro2, Elena Maqueda2, Paulo Ávila-Gómez2, José Manuel Pumar5, José Castillo2, Tomás Sobrino2, Francisco Campos2, Pablo Hervella6.
Abstract
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is commonly used to evaluate stroke neurological deficits and to predict the patient's outcome. Neurological instability (NI), defined as the variation of the NIHSS in the first 48 h, is a simple clinical metric that reflects dynamic changes in the area of the brain affected by the ischemia. We hypothesize that NI may represent areas of cerebral instability known as penumbra, which could expand or reduce brain injury and its associated neurological sequels. In this work, our aim was to analyze the association of NI with the functional outcome at 3 months and to study clinical biomarkers associated to NI as surrogate biomarkers of ischemic and inflammatory penumbrae in ischemic stroke (IS) patients. We included 663 IS patients in a retrospective observational study. Neutral NI was defined as a variation in the NI scale between - 5 and 5% (37.1%). Positive NI is attributed to patients with an improvement of > 5% NI after 48 h (48.9%), while negative NI is assigned to patients values lower than - 5% (14.0%). Poor outcome was assigned to patients with mRS ≥ 3 at 3 months. We observed an inverse association of poor outcome with positive NI (OR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.18-0.67; p = 0.002) and a direct association with negative NI (OR, 6.30; 95%CI, 2.12-18.65; p = 0.001). Negative NI showed a higher association with poor outcome than most clinical markers. Regarding good functional outcome, positive NI was the marker with the higher association (19.31; CI 95%, 9.03-41.28; p < 0.0001) and with the highest percentage of identified patients with good functional outcome (17.6%). Patients with negative NI have higher glutamate levels compared with patients with neutral and positive NI (p < 0.0001). IL6 levels are significantly lower in patients with positive NI compared with neutral NI (p < 0.0001), while patients with negative NI showed the highest IL6 values (p < 0.0001). High glutamate levels were associated with negative NI at short latency times, decreasing at higher latency times. An opposite trend was observed for inflammation, and IL6 levels were similar in patients with positive and negative NI in the first 6 h and then higher in patients with negative NI. These results support NI as a prognosis factor in IS and the hypothesis of the existence of a delayed inflammatory penumbra, opening up the possibility of extending the therapeutic window for IS.Entities:
Keywords: Glutamate; Interleukin; Latency time; Neurological instability; Stroke
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34165728 PMCID: PMC8918467 DOI: 10.1007/s12975-021-00924-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Stroke Res ISSN: 1868-4483 Impact factor: 6.829
Fig. 1Three-month functional outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS]) of ischemic stroke patients with neutral, positive, or negative neurological instability (NI)
Logistic regression model for factors related with poor outcome at 3 months
| OR | CI 95% | OR* | CI 95% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurological instability | ||||||
| Neutral | Ref | - | - | Ref | - | - |
| Positive | 0.21 | 0.18–0.54 | 0.001 | 0.35 | 0.18–0.67 | 0.002 |
| Negative | 14.26 | 6.62–30.74 | < 0.0001 | 6.30 | 2.12–18.65 | 0.001 |
| Latency time | 1.00 | 1.00–1.00 | < 0.0001 | 1.00 | 1.00–1.00 | 0.001 |
| Any reperfusion treatment | 0.28 | 0.19–0.40 | < 0.0001 | 0.21 | 0.11–0.41 | < 0.0001 |
| Glutamate at admission (uM) | 1.01 | 1.00–1.01 | < 0.0001 | 1.01 | 1.00–1.01 | 0.005 |
| IL6 at admission (pg/mL) | 0.998 | 0.98–1.02 | 0.841 | 0.93 | 0.89–0.96 | < 0.0001 |
*Adjusted by age, sex, latency time, previous mRS, atrial fibrillation, temperature, NIHSS at admission, C-reactive protein, infarct growth, any reperfusion treatment, glutamate at admission and IL6 at admission, and neurological instability
Fig. 2Percentages of patients with neutral, positive, and negative neurological instability (NI) in regard their latency time
Logistic regression model for factors related with negative neurological improvement
| OR | CI 95% | OR* | CI 95% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latency time | ||||||
| Q1: 0–164 min | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Q2: 164–210 min | 5.86 | 1.27–26.97 | 0.023 | 1.93 | 0.34–10.95 | 0.459 |
| Q3: 210–329 min | 15.51 | 3.60–66.80 | < 0.0001 | 6.39 | 1.34–30.43 | 0.02 |
| Q4: 329–360 min | 22.75 | 5.34–96.85 | < 0.0001 | 15.34 | 3.35–70.18 | < 0.0001 |
| Q5: > 360 min | 11.33 | 2.58–49.73 | 0.001 | 3.71 | 0.72–19.19 | 0.117 |
| Any reperfusion treatment | 0.42 | 0.24–0.76 | 0.004 | 0.41 | 0.17–0.96 | 0.04 |
*Adjusted by previous mRS, arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation, time since last TIA less than 1 day, axillary temperature ≥ 37.5, and C-reactive protein
Fig. 3a Glutamate levels in ischemic stroke patients with neutral, positive, and negative neurological instability in regard the latency time. ANOVA tests were performed to evaluate differences in every latency time quintile. b IL6 levels in IS patients in with neutral, positive, and negative neurological instability in regard the latency time. ANOVA test was performed to evaluate differences in every latency time quintile