| Literature DB >> 34164868 |
Lei-Lei Yuan1,2, Chang-Mi Deng2, Wen-Qiong Xue2, Yong-Qiao He2, Tong-Min Wang2, Jiang-Bo Zhang2, Da-Wei Yang1,2, Ting Zhou2, Zi-Yi Wu2, Ying Liao2, Mei-Qi Zheng2, Dan-Hua Li2, Lian-Jing Cao2, Yi-Jing Jia1,2, Wen-Li Zhang2, Ruo-Wen Xiao2, Lu-Ting Luo1,2, Xia-Ting Tong1,2, Yan-Xia Wu2, Jing-Wen Huang1,2, Wei-Hua Jia1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated cancer, exhibits an extremely high incidence in southern Chinese. Given that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) plays critical roles in antigen presentation and relates to NPC susceptibility, it is speculated that certain HLA variants may affect EBV reactivation, which is a key pathogenic factor of NPC. Therefore, we attempted to identify HLA alleles associated with the indicator of EBV reactivation, Zta-IgA, in healthy males from NPC endemic area.Entities:
Keywords: Epstein-Barr virus; Zta-IgA; human leukocyte antigen; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; smoking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34164868 PMCID: PMC8596395 DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Gene Med ISSN: 1099-498X Impact factor: 4.565
Characteristics of 1078 healthy males in an NPC endemic area
| Variables | All, | EBV Zta‐IgA seropositive, | EBV Zta‐IgA seronegative, |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1,078 | 166 (15.4) | 912 (84.6) | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 49.79 ± 10.91 | 52.79 ± 10.57 | 49.24 ± 10.89 | < 0.001 |
| Education level | 0.092 | |||
| Primary school or less | 137 (12.8) | 27 (16.5) | 110 (12.1) | |
| High school | 608 (56.6) | 97 (59.1) | 511 (56.2) | |
| University or more | 329 (30.6) | 40 (24.4) | 289 (31.8) | |
| Smoking status | 0.017 | |||
| never | 328 (30.4) | 37 (22.3) | 291 (31.9) | |
| ever | 750 (69.6) | 129 (77.7) | 621 (68.1) | |
| Alcohol consumption | 0.436 | |||
| never | 464 (43.0) | 77 (46.4) | 387 (42.4) | |
| <1 drink per week | 395 (36.6) | 61 (36.7) | 334 (36.6) | |
| ≥1 drink per week | 219 (20.3) | 28 (16.9) | 191 (20.9) | |
| Family history of NPC | 0.448 | |||
| no | 992 (95.8) | 153 (94.4) | 839 (96.1) | |
| yes | 43 (4.2) | 9 (5.6) | 34 (3.9) | |
| Family history of cancer | 0.656 | |||
| no | 759 (73.3) | 116 (71.6) | 643 (73.7) | |
| yes | 276 (26.7) | 46 (28.4) | 230 (26.3) | |
A t test and chi‐squared test were used to compare the mean of continuous factors and proportions of categorical factors between the EBV Zta‐IgA seronegative group and the EBV Zta‐IgA seropositive group.
Association between HLA alleles and EBV Zta‐IgA serological status
| HLA alleles | Allele frequencies | OR (95% CI) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total ( | Zta‐IgA seropositive ( | Zta‐IgA seronegative ( | |||
| HLA‐A | |||||
| 26:01 | 0.019 | 0.030 | 0.018 | 1.85 (0.88–3.88) | 0.104 |
| HLA‐B | |||||
| 13:01 | 0.079 | 0.066 | 0.076 | 0.88 (0.54–1.43) | 0.610 |
| 58:01 | 0.079 | 0.054 | 0.081 | 0.68 (0.41–1.13) | 0.134 |
| 07:05 | 0.022 | 0.012 | 0.026 | 0.48 (0.17–1.34) | 0.158 |
| 13:02 | 0.021 | 0.009 | 0.025 | 0.38 (0.11–1.23) | 0.106 |
| HLA‐C | |||||
| 07:02 | 0.228 | 0.259 | 0.226 | 1.16 (0.88–1.54) | 0.290 |
| 08:01 | 0.115 | 0.090 | 0.113 | 0.81 (0.54–1.22) | 0.309 |
| 03:02 | 0.068 | 0.054 | 0.069 | 0.79 (0.48–1.31) | 0.365 |
| 15:02 | 0.035 | 0.027 | 0.033 | 0.75 (0.36–1.53) | 0.422 |
| 04:03 | 0.022 | 0.015 | 0.026 | 0.60 (0.23–1.55) | 0.292 |
| HLA‐DPA1 | |||||
| 02:01 | 0.077 | 0.051 | 0.081 | 0.67 (0.40–1.11) | 0.116 |
| HLA‐DPB1 | |||||
| 21:01 | 0.053 | 0.021 | 0.054 | 0.38 (0.17–0.82) | 0.014 |
| HLA‐DQA1 | |||||
| 06:01 | 0.134 | 0.142 | 0.130 | 1.11 (0.78–1.56) | 0.568 |
| 01:04 | 0.086 | 0.066 | 0.088 | 0.74 (0.47–1.18) | 0.205 |
| 05:01 | 0.064 | 0.057 | 0.067 | 0.84 (0.51–1.39) | 0.492 |
| HLA‐DQB1 | |||||
| 05:02 | 0.180 | 0.178 | 0.173 | 1.00 (0.74–1.36) | 0.986 |
| 06:01 | 0.121 | 0.090 | 0.130 | 0.66 (0.44–1.00) | 0.048 |
| 02:01 | 0.065 | 0.060 | 0.068 | 0.88 (0.54–1.43) | 0.599 |
| 03:02 | 0.059 | 0.066 | 0.058 | 1.13 (0.70–1.81) | 0.620 |
| 05:03 | 0.054 | 0.036 | 0.056 | 0.62 (0.34–1.14) | 0.122 |
| 05:01 | 0.033 | 0.027 | 0.036 | 0.76 (0.37–1.53) | 0.437 |
| 06:09 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.96 (0.33–2.84) | 0.947 |
| HLA‐DRB1 | |||||
| 09:01 | 0.131 | 0.202 | 0.125 | 1.80 (1.32–2.45) |
|
| 12:02 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.127 | 1.03 (0.72–1.48) | 0.869 |
| 13:02 | 0.019 | 0.018 | 0.020 | 1.00 (0.41–2.42) | 0.996 |
Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of HLA dosage alleles were calculated using logistic regression adjusting for two covariates (age, smoking status) under additive assumption.
Bold indicates significant p values after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (0.05/25 = 2.00 × 10−3).
FIGURE 1The effect of smoking and HLA‐DRB1*09:01 on EBV Zta‐IgA serological status. We divided smoking categories by cumulative amount (never, < 20, ≥ 20 pack‐years) for the analysis. Never smokers without HLA‐DRB1*09:01 were defined as the reference group. Odds ratios (ORs) for the Zta‐IgA seropositive group (Zta‐IgA+) versus Zta‐IgA seronegative group (Zta‐IgA‐) among different carrier status of HLA‐DRB1*09:01 and smoking status were calculated using logistic regression models. Test was adjusted for age. The test was two‐sided and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significanr. Squares indicate study‐specific odds ratios; horizontal lines indicate study‐specific confidence intervals (CIs); the solid vertical line indicates an odds ratio of 1.0
The EBV Zta‐peptides with predicted strong binding affinities for the HLA‐DRB1 alleles
| HLA allele | Pos | Zta‐peptide | Zta‐peptide Core | Score _EL | %rank _EL | Bind Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 197 | LQH | YREVAAAKS | 0.78 | 0.29 | Strong | |
| 196 | LLQH | YREVAAAKS | 0.73 | 0.47 | Strong | |
| 198 | QH | YREVAAAKS | 0.70 | 0.60 | Strong | |
| 83 | ENA | YQAYAAPQL | 0.67 | 0.77 | Strong | |
| 82 | PENA | YQAYAAPQL | 0.67 | 0.78 | Strong | |
| 60 | QLTA | YHVSTAPTG | 0.67 | 0.80 | Strong | |
| 61 | LTA | YHVSTAPTG | 0.66 | 0.84 | Strong | |
| 59 | GQLTA | YHVSTAPTG | 0.66 | 0.87 | Strong | |
| 195 | QLLQH | YREVAAAKS | 0.61 | 1.19 | Strong | |
| 62 | TA | YHVSTAPTG | 0.55 | 1.67 | Strong | |
| 81 | APENA | YQAYAAPQL | 0.54 | 1.80 | Strong | |
| 84 | NA | YQAYAAPQL | 0.53 | 1.86 | Strong | |
|
| ||||||
| 174 | ELE | IKRYKNRVA | 0.36 | 1.40 | Strong | |
| 190 | RAK | FKQLLQHYR | 0.35 | 1.48 | Strong | |
| 189 | CRAK | FKQLLQHYR | 0.32 | 1.98 | Strong | |
|
| ||||||
| 174 | ELE | IKRYKNRVA | 0.49 | 1.17 | Strong | |
Pos, peptide position (starting from 0).
Score_EL, raw eluted ligand likelihood prediction score.
%Rank EL, rank of the predicted eluted ligand likelihood score compared to a set of random natural peptides.
Binding level: Strong = strong binding. The threshold for strong binding peptides (%Rank_EL) is 2%. Peptides with %Rank_EL > 2% are not shown.
Bold indicates the 9‐mer core of EBV Zta‐peptide showing strong binding affinity for the corresponding HLA‐DRB1 allele.