| Literature DB >> 34164177 |
Kun Liu1,2, Wentao Feng3, Xianda Yang3, Jinglun Shen1,2, Haibo Zhang1,2, Yubo Fan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Porcine valves are used for mitral valve replacement, but the limited long-term durability has restricted the application in younger patients. Degenerated porcine mitral valves were explanted to analyze the failure modes and damage characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Porcine mitral valve; commissural dehiscence; cusp tears; explant analysis; structural valve deterioration
Year: 2021 PMID: 34164177 PMCID: PMC8182507 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895
Figure 1The different types of cusp tears. type I (longitudinal tear involving the free edges of the cusps), type II (along and parallel to the sewing ring), type III (large, round, or oval perforations at the center of the leaflets), type IV (several pinholes at the center of the leaflets).
Patient basic characteristics
| Demographics and Characteristics | Porcine valves |
|---|---|
| N | 12 |
| Female, n (%) | 9 (75.00) |
| Age (year) | 55±19.64 |
| Height (cm) | 165.58±5.4 |
| Weight (kg) | 62.42±9.3 |
| First surgery age (year) | 45.58±20.59 |
| Implant duration (year) | 9.39±4.14 |
| First surgery reason, n (%) | |
| Rheumatic heart disease | 8 (66.67) |
| Infective endocarditis | 2 (16.67) |
| Degenerative valvular disease | 1 (8.33) |
| Congenital heart disease | 1 (8.33) |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 5 (41.67) |
| Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 4 (33.33) |
| Coronary Heart Disease, n (%) | 2 (16.67) |
| Valve size, n (%) | |
| 25 mm | 3 (25.00) |
| 27 mm | 6 (50.00) |
| 29 mm | 3 (25.00) |
Values are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD.
Pathologic findings of 12 porcine mitral valves
| NO. | Trade mark | Implant duration (years) | Sex | Cusp tear (type) | Commissural dehiscence | Ca (type) | Pannus (type) | Dysfunction reason | TTE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CE-SAV | 6 | M | I | No | 0 | III | Tears | MI |
| 2 | CE-SAV | 7.08 | F | 0 | Yes | 0 | I | Commissural Dehiscence | MI |
| 3 | CE-SAV | 11.33 | F | 0 | Yes | III | 0 | Commissural Dehiscence | MI |
| 4 | CE-SAV | 12 | F | I | No | IV | IV | Ca | MS |
| 5 | CE-SAV | 6.75 | F | 0 | Yes | 0 | II | Commissural Dehiscence | MI |
| 6 | CE-SAV | 18.75 | F | I | No | 0 | III | Tears | MI |
| 7 | CE-SAV | 12 | F | 0 | Yes | I | II | Commissural Dehiscence | MI |
| 8 | Hancock II | 6.08 | M | 0 | Yes | 0 | III | Commissural Dehiscence | MI |
| 9 | Hancock II | 12 | F | I | No | II | I | Tears | MI |
| 10 | Hancock II | 5.67 | F | I | No | IV | II | Ca | MS MI |
| 11 | Hancock II | 4.25 | M | 0 | No | II | IV | Pannus | MI |
| 12 | Hancock II | 10.75 | F | I | No | IV | III | Ca | MI |
Ca, calcification; M, male; F, female; MI, mitral regurgitation; MS, mitral stenosis; TTE, transthoracic echocardiogram.
Figure 2Leaflet deterioration near the stent posts (Type I tears and Commissural dehiscence). (A) Type I tear at the edge of valve leaflet (arrow); Pannus around the valve ring and stent (+); (B) Commissural dehiscence at the apex of the valve stent (#).
Figure 3Calcification in the Hancock II porcine valve. (A) Calcification in valve leaflets with valve tears (*), indicating cusp tears (arrow); Pannus around the valve ring (+); (B) Microcomputed tomography scanning, three-dimensional reconstruction; red part indicates calcification in valve leaflets.
Figure 4Pathological staining of the valve leaflet. The black parts represent calcified tissue, type IV (*), pannus covering the surface of the leaflet (+). F, Inflow; L, valve leaflet (original magnification, ×1.5; hematoxylin and eosin).